Literature DB >> 33528638

The effect of EML4-ALK break-apart ratio on crizotinib outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer harboring EML4-ALK rearrangement.

Burak Bilgin1, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur2, Şebnem Yücel3, Mutlu Hizal2, Gürkan Güner4, Nalan Akyürek5, Cihan Erol2, Muhammed Bülent Akıncı2, Didem Şener Dede2, Bülent Yalçın2, Sadettin Kılıçkap4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement exists in approximately 3-7% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and more than 15% split or isolated red signals among 50 tumor nuclei scored in the FISH analysis defines as ALK-positive. The previous studies showed that the high EGFR mutational load related to better outcomes in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of the ALK break-apart ratio on treatment outcome in metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC.
METHODS: The patients (pts) who ALK-positive and treated with crizotinib were retrospectively enrolled. The 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% break-apart ratios were determined as a threshold value, and each of these was evaluated separately. Based on the results of these analyses, we detected the optimal threshold value and also performed further investigations.
RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were enrolled in the study. The most significant decrease in the risk of the progression or death was detected at the 50% threshold value and it was accepted as the optimal threshold. The median PFS was 17.9 vs. 7.06 months (mo) in the pts with high ALK rearrangement than low (HR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.76, p 0.004). The median OS was also significant longer in high ALK rearrange group (44.6 mo vs. 16.8 mo; HR: 0.37, 95% Cl 0.1883-0.7315; p 0.004). The intracranial progression during crizotinib treatment was significantly frequent in the pts with high ALK rearrangement (62.5-32.5%, P 0.039) DISCUSSION: In this study, we found that the high break-apart ratio can predict the extent of benefit from targeted therapy in ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Based on the results of this study, the percentage of the ALK rearrangement can be used to predict treatment outcome and to choose the optimal targeted agent in the treatment of metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALK; Break-apart; FISH; Threshold

Year:  2021        PMID: 33528638     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03546-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  24 in total

1.  Multicenter Phase II Study of Whole-Body and Intracranial Activity With Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy and Crizotinib: Results From ASCEND-2.

Authors:  Lucio Crinò; Myung-Ju Ahn; Filippo De Marinis; Harry J M Groen; Heather Wakelee; Toyoaki Hida; Tony Mok; David Spigel; Enriqueta Felip; Makoto Nishio; Giorgio Scagliotti; Fabrice Branle; Chetachi Emeremni; Massimiliano Quadrigli; Jie Zhang; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Correlations between the percentage of tumor cells showing an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, ALK signal copy number, and response to crizotinib therapy in ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Mariana Theodoro; Delee A Maxson; Margaret Skokan; Tara O'Brien; Xian Lu; Robert C Doebele; Anna E Barón; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Factors associated with the development of brain metastases: analysis of 975 patients with early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jessica L Hubbs; Jessamy A Boyd; Donna Hollis; Junzo P Chino; Mert Saynak; Chris R Kelsey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Discrepancies between FISH and immunohistochemistry for assessment of the ALK status are associated with ALK 'borderline'-positive rearrangements or a high copy number: a potential major issue for anti-ALK therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  M I Ilie; C Bence; V Hofman; E Long-Mira; C Butori; L Bouhlel; S Lalvée; J Mouroux; M Poudenx; J Otto; C H Marquette; P Hofman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Optimizing the detection of lung cancer patients harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements potentially suitable for ALK inhibitor treatment.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Scott A Kono; Antonella Flacco; Aik-Choon Tan; Robert C Doebele; Qing Zhou; Lucio Crino; Wilbur A Franklin; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Hye Ryun Kim; Myung-Ju Ahn; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Ji-Youn Han; Jong-Seok Lee; Maximilian J Hochmair; Jacky Yu-Chung Li; Gee-Chen Chang; Ki Hyeong Lee; Cesare Gridelli; Angelo Delmonte; Rosario Garcia Campelo; Dong-Wan Kim; Alessandra Bearz; Frank Griesinger; Alessandro Morabito; Enriqueta Felip; Raffaele Califano; Sharmistha Ghosh; Alexander Spira; Scott N Gettinger; Marcello Tiseo; Neeraj Gupta; Jeff Haney; David Kerstein; Sanjay Popat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  EGFR genetic heterogeneity of nonsmall cell lung cancers contributing to acquired gefitinib resistance.

Authors:  Shi-Xu Jiang; Kazuya Yamashita; Michiko Yamamoto; Chun-Ji Piao; Atsuko Umezawa; Makoto Saegusa; Tsutomu Yoshida; Masato Katagiri; Noriyuki Masuda; Kazushige Hayakawa; Isao Okayasu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Variants and the Percentage of ALK-Positive Tumor Cells and the Efficacy of Crizotinib in Advanced NSCLC.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Lei; Jin-Ji Yang; Xu-Chao Zhang; Wen-Zhao Zhong; Qing Zhou; Hai-Yan Tu; Hong-Xia Tian; Wei-Bang Guo; Lu-Lu Yang; Hong-Hong Yan; Hua-Jun Chen; Zhi Xie; Jian Su; Jie-Fei Han; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study.

Authors:  S Novello; J Mazières; I-J Oh; J de Castro; M R Migliorino; Å Helland; R Dziadziuszko; F Griesinger; A Kotb; A Zeaiter; A Cardona; B Balas; H K Johannsdottir; A Das-Gupta; J Wolf
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.