Literature DB >> 29864516

3D breast cancer microtissue reveals the role of tumor microenvironment on the transport and efficacy of free-doxorubicin in vitro.

Virginia Brancato1, Filomena Gioiella1, Giorgia Imparato2, Daniela Guarnieri3, Francesco Urciuolo4, Paolo A Netti5.   

Abstract

The use of 3D cancer models will have both ethical and economic impact in drug screening and development, to promote the reduction of the animals employed in preclinical studies. Nevertheless, to be effective, such cancer surrogates must preserve the physiological relevance of the in vivo models in order to provide realistic information on drugs' efficacy. To figure out the role of the architecture and composition of 3D cancer models on their tumor-mimicking capability, here we studied the efficacy of doxorubicin (DOX), a well-known anticancer molecule in two different 3D cancer models: our 3D breast cancer microtissue (3D-μTP) versus the golden standard represented by spheroid model (sph). Both models were obtained by using cancer associated fibroblast (CAF) and breast cancer cells (MCF-7) as cellular component. Unlike spheroid model, 3D-μTP was engineered in order to induce the production of endogenous extracellular matrix by CAF. 3D-μTP have been compared to spheroid in mono- (MCF-7 alone) and co-culture (MCF-7/CAF), after the treatment with DOX in order to study cytotoxicity effect, diffusional transport and expression of proteins related to cancer progression. Compared to the spheroid model, 3D-μTP showed higher diffusion coefficient of DOX and lower cell viability. Also, the expression of some tumoral biomarkers related to cell junctions were different in the two models. STATEMENTS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Cancer biology has made progress in unraveling the mechanism of cancer progression, anyway the most of the results are still obtained by 2D cell cultures or animal models, that do not faithfully copycat the tumor microenvironment. The lack of correlation between preclinical models and in vivo organisms negatively influences the clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Consequently, even if a huge amount of new drugs has been developed in the last decades, still people are dying because of cancer. Pharmaceutical companies are interested in 3D tumor model as valid alternative in drug screening in preclinical studies. However, a 3D tumor model that completely mimics tumor heterogeneity is still far to achieve. In our work we compare 3D human breast cancer microtissues and spheroids in terms of response to doxorubicin and drug diffusion. We believe that our results are interesting because they highlight the potential role of the proposed tumor model in the attempts to improve efficacy tests.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D breast cancer model; Doxorubicin; Extracellular matrix; Microtissues

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29864516     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  24 in total

Review 1.  Current status and contemporary approaches to the discovery of antitumor agents from higher plants.

Authors:  Garima Agarwal; Peter J Blanco Carcache; Ermias Mekuria Addo; A Douglas Kinghorn
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 2.  Proteinaceous Hydrogels for Bioengineering Advanced 3D Tumor Models.

Authors:  Barbara Blanco-Fernandez; Vítor M Gaspar; Elisabeth Engel; João F Mano
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  Exploring Amodiaquine's Repurposing Potential in Breast Cancer Treatment-Assessment of In-Vitro Efficacy & Mechanism of Action.

Authors:  Vineela Parvathaneni; Rameswari Chilamakuri; Nishant S Kulkarni; Nabeela F Baig; Saurabh Agarwal; Vivek Gupta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Integrated Biophysical Characterization of Fibrillar Collagen-Based Hydrogels.

Authors:  Alex Avendano; Jonathan J Chang; Marcos G Cortes-Medina; Aaron J Seibel; Bitania R Admasu; Cassandra M Boutelle; Andrew R Bushman; Ayush Arpit Garg; Cameron M DeShetler; Sara L Cole; Jonathan W Song
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 5.  Breast cancer models: Engineering the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Gokhan Bahcecioglu; Gozde Basara; Bradley W Ellis; Xiang Ren; Pinar Zorlutuna
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Breast Cancer Reconstruction: Design Criteria for a Humanized Microphysiological System.

Authors:  Trivia Frazier; Christopher Williams; Michael Henderson; Tamika Duplessis; Emma Rogers; Xiying Wu; Katie Hamel; Elizabeth C Martin; Omair Mohiuddin; Shahensha Shaik; Ram Devireddy; Brian G Rowan; Daniel J Hayes; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Breast tumor-on-chip models: From disease modeling to personalized drug screening.

Authors:  Bano Subia; Ujjwal Ranjan Dahiya; Sarita Mishra; Jessica Ayache; Guilhem Velve Casquillas; David Caballero; Rui L Reis; Subhas C Kundu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 8.  In Vitro Cancer Models: A Closer Look at Limitations on Translation.

Authors:  Nina Antunes; Banani Kundu; Subhas C Kundu; Rui L Reis; Vítor Correlo
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

9.  Generation of uniform-sized multicellular tumor spheroids using hydrogel microwells for advanced drug screening.

Authors:  Jong Min Lee; Da Yeon Park; Letao Yang; Eun-Joong Kim; Christian D Ahrberg; Ki-Bum Lee; Bong Geun Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Heterogeneous microenvironmental stiffness regulates pro-metastatic functions of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Chun Liu; Miao Li; Zhao-Xia Dong; Dong Jiang; Xiaojing Li; Shuibin Lin; Demeng Chen; Xuenong Zou; Xing-Ding Zhang; Gary D Luker
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 10.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.