| Literature DB >> 33527584 |
Junichiro Hayano1, Norihiro Ueda1, Masaya Kisohara1, Emi Yuda2, Eiichi Watanabe3, Robert M Carney4, James A Blumenthal5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blunted cyclic variation of heart rate (CVHR), measured as a decrease in CVHR amplitude (Acv), predicts mortality risk after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, Acv also can be reduced in mild sleep apnea with mild O2 desaturation. We investigated whether Acv's predictive power for post-AMI mortality could be improved by considering the effect of sleep apnea severity.Entities:
Keywords: ALLSTAR; cyclic variation of heart rate; heart rate variability; mortality; myocardial infarction; sleep apnea
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33527584 PMCID: PMC8164146 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ISSN: 1082-720X Impact factor: 1.468
FIGURE 1Relationships between the amplitude of cyclic variation of heart rate (CVHR), O2 desaturation, apnea‐hypopnea index, and the frequency of CVHR in patients undergoing diagnostic polysomnography for suspected sleep‐disordered breathing. Acv, amplitude of CVHR; Fcv, frequency of CVHR
Characteristics of participants in ALLSTAR database (N = 194,490)
| Age, years | 68 (57–77) |
| Female | 108,926 (56.0%) |
| Heart rate, bpm | 71.7 (65.2–78.2) |
| Fcv, /h | 7.14 (3.68–12.6) |
| Acv, ln(ms) | 4.52 (4.18–4.83) |
| Percentile Acv | 50 (25–75) |
Data are median (IQR) or n (%).
Abbreviations: Acv, amplitude of cyclic variation of heart rate; Fcv, frequency of cyclic variation of heart rate.
FIGURE 2Distribution of Acv depending on the Fcv value and the percentile regression lines of Acv by Fcv in the ALLSTAR database. The percentile regression lines from 1st to 99th percentiles connect the respective Acv percentile points at the respective Fcv values
FIGURE 3Distribution of Acv depending on the Fcv value in the ENRICHD cohort. Green circles represent survivors, and purple squares represent non‐survivors. The lines from 1st to 99th percentiles are the percentile regression lines that were generated in the ALLSTAR database (Figure 2)
Characteristics of patients in ENRICHD cohort (N = 717)
|
Survivors
|
Non‐survivors
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 59 (50–67) | 65 (56–73) | .001 |
| Female | 264 (39.2%) | 20 (45.5%) | .4 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 67.6 (61.1–77.0) | 72.2 (63.3–80.4) | .05 |
| Fcv, /h | 9.00 (4.79–15.5) | 10.9 (3.63–23.1) | .4 |
| Acv, ln(ms) | 4.54 (4.08–4.86) | 3.67 (3.23–4.08) | <.0001 |
| Percentile Acv | 48 (19–75) | 7 (3–13) | <.0001 |
Data are median (IQR) or N (%).
Significance of difference by Wilcoxon two‐sample test or chi‐square test.
Abbreviations are explained in the footnote to Table 1.
Predictive power of Fcv, Acv, and percentile Acv for post‐AMI mortality in ENRICHD cohort (logistic regression analysis)
| Predictor | Concordant, % | Discordant, % | Somers’ D | c‐statistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fcv | 66.3 | 33.7 | 0.326 | 0.667 ± 0.041 |
| Acv | 81.5 | 18.5 | 0.630 | 0.817 ± 0.035 |
| Percentile Acv | 84.3 | 15.6 | 0.687 | 0.843 ± 0.030 |
All models are adjusted for the effect of age.