Valentina Muollo1, Andrea P Rossi2, Andrea Zignoli3, Massimo Teso4, Chiara Milanese4, Valentina Cavedon4, Mauro Zamboni2, Federico Schena4,5, Carlo Capelli4, Silvia Pogliaghi6. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 2. Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Healthy Aging Center Verona, Verona, Italy. 3. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy. 4. Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 5. Sport Mountain and Health Research Center (CeRiSM), University of Verona, Rovereto, Italy. 6. Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. silvia.pogliaghi@univr.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Muscle function is a marker of current and prospective health/independence throughout life. The effects of sex and obesity (OB) on the loss of muscle function in ageing remain unresolved, with important implications for the diagnosis/monitoring of sarcopenia. To characterise in vivo knee extensors' function, we compared muscles torque and power with isometric and isokinetic tests in older men (M) and women (W), with normal range (NW) of body mass index (BMI) and OB. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: In 70 sedentary older M and W (69 ± 5 years), NW and OB (i.e. BMI < 30 kg m-2 and ≥30 kg m-2, respectively) we tested the right knee's extensor: (i) isometric torque at 30°, 60°, 75° and 90° knee angles, and (ii) isokinetic concentric torque at 60, 90, 150, 180 and 210° s-1 angular speeds. Maximal isometric T-angle, maximal isokinetic knee-extensor torque-velocity, theoretical maximal shortening velocity, maximal power, optimal torque and velocity were determined in absolute units, normalised by body mass (BM) and right leg lean mass (LLMR) and compared over sex, BMI categories and angle or angular speeds by three-way ANOVA. RESULTS: In absolute units, relative to BM and LLMR, sex differences were found in favour of M for all parameters of muscle function (main effect for sex, p < 0.05). OB did not affect either absolute or relative to LLMR isometric and isokinetic muscle function (main effect for BMI, p > 0.05); however, muscle function indices, when adjusted for BM, were lower in both M and W with OB compared to NW counterparts (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed sex differences in absolute, relative to BM and LLMR muscle function in favour of men. While overall muscle function and muscle contractile quality is conserved in individuals with class I OB, muscle function normalised for BM, which defines the ability to perform independently and safely the activities of daily living, is impaired in comparison with physiological ageing.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Muscle function is a marker of current and prospective health/independence throughout life. The effects of sex and obesity (OB) on the loss of muscle function in ageing remain unresolved, with important implications for the diagnosis/monitoring of sarcopenia. To characterise in vivo knee extensors' function, we compared muscles torque and power with isometric and isokinetic tests in older men (M) and women (W), with normal range (NW) of body mass index (BMI) and OB. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: In 70 sedentary older M and W (69 ± 5 years), NW and OB (i.e. BMI < 30 kg m-2 and ≥30 kg m-2, respectively) we tested the right knee's extensor: (i) isometric torque at 30°, 60°, 75° and 90° knee angles, and (ii) isokinetic concentric torque at 60, 90, 150, 180 and 210° s-1 angular speeds. Maximal isometric T-angle, maximal isokinetic knee-extensor torque-velocity, theoretical maximal shortening velocity, maximal power, optimal torque and velocity were determined in absolute units, normalised by body mass (BM) and right leg lean mass (LLMR) and compared over sex, BMI categories and angle or angular speeds by three-way ANOVA. RESULTS: In absolute units, relative to BM and LLMR, sex differences were found in favour of M for all parameters of muscle function (main effect for sex, p < 0.05). OB did not affect either absolute or relative to LLMR isometric and isokinetic muscle function (main effect for BMI, p > 0.05); however, muscle function indices, when adjusted for BM, were lower in both M and W with OB compared to NW counterparts (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed sex differences in absolute, relative to BM and LLMR muscle function in favour of men. While overall muscle function and muscle contractile quality is conserved in individuals with class I OB, muscle function normalised for BM, which defines the ability to perform independently and safely the activities of daily living, is impaired in comparison with physiological ageing.
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Francesco Landi; Eva Topinková; Jean-Pierre Michel Journal: Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Matthew J Delmonico; Tamara B Harris; Marjolein Visser; Seok Won Park; Molly B Conroy; Pedro Velasquez-Mieyer; Robert Boudreau; Todd M Manini; Michael Nevitt; Anne B Newman; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: C Cooper; R Fielding; M Visser; L J van Loon; Y Rolland; E Orwoll; K Reid; S Boonen; W Dere; S Epstein; B Mitlak; Y Tsouderos; A A Sayer; R Rizzoli; J Y Reginster; J A Kanis Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 4.333