Literature DB >> 33526790

Hypnotic suggestions of safety reduce neuronal signals of delay discounting.

Barbara Schmidt1, Clay B Holroyd2.   

Abstract

Waiting for delayed rewards is important to reach long-term goals, yet most people prefer immediate rewards. This tendency is called delay discounting. Evidence shows that people are more willing to wait for delayed rewards when they believe that the delayed reward is certain. We hypothesized that feeling safe makes delayed outcomes subjectively more certain, which should in turn reduce neuronal signals of delay discounting. We hypnotized 24 highly suggestible participants and gave them a suggestion to feel safe. We then used EEG to measure their brain responses to immediate and delayed rewards while they played a delayed gratification game. As compared to a control condition without hypnosis, participants that were suggested to feel safe under hypnosis reported feeling significantly safer. Further, their reward-related brain activity differentiated less between immediate and delayed rewards. We conclude that feeling safe makes delayed outcomes subjectively more certain and therefore reduces neuronal signals of delay discounting.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33526790      PMCID: PMC7851403          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81572-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  48 in total

1.  Norms on the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A.

Authors:  R E SHOR; E C ORNE
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  1963-01

2.  The role of expectancy in delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  A R MAHRER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-08

Review 3.  A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  High temporal discounters overvalue immediate rewards rather than undervalue future rewards: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Avital S Cherniawsky; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity.

Authors:  Jennifer N Bress; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Michael T Amlung; Lauren R Few; Lara A Ray; Lawrence H Sweet; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Event-related brain potentials and the study of reward processing: Methodological considerations.

Authors:  Olave E Krigolson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Olave E Krigolson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Feeling Safe With Hypnosis: Eliciting Positive Feelings During a Special State of Consciousness.

Authors:  Barbara Schmidt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.