Literature DB >> 33526655

Network motifs involving both competition and facilitation predict biodiversity in alpine plant communities.

Gianalberto Losapio1,2, Christian Schöb1, Phillip P A Staniczenko3, Francesco Carrara4, Gian Marco Palamara5, Consuelo M De Moraes6, Mark C Mescher6, Rob W Brooker7, Bradley J Butterfield8, Ragan M Callaway9, Lohengrin A Cavieres10, Zaal Kikvidze11, Christopher J Lortie12,13, Richard Michalet14, Francisco I Pugnaire15, Jordi Bascompte16.   

Abstract

Biological diversity depends on multiple, cooccurring ecological interactions. However, most studies focus on one interaction type at a time, leaving community ecologists unsure of how positive and negative associations among species combine to influence biodiversity patterns. Using surveys of plant populations in alpine communities worldwide, we explore patterns of positive and negative associations among triads of species (modules) and their relationship to local biodiversity. Three modules, each incorporating both positive and negative associations, were overrepresented, thus acting as "network motifs." Furthermore, the overrepresentation of these network motifs is positively linked to species diversity globally. A theoretical model illustrates that these network motifs, based on competition between facilitated species or facilitation between inferior competitors, increase local persistence. Our findings suggest that the interplay of competition and facilitation is crucial for maintaining biodiversity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity change; community ecology; ecological networks; mountain ecosystems; plant interaction networks

Year:  2021        PMID: 33526655      PMCID: PMC8017722          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005759118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; R W Brooker; Philippe Choler; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Richard Michalet; Leonardo Paolini; Francisco I Pugnaire; Beth Newingham; Erik T Aschehoug; Cristina Armas; David Kikodze; Bradley J Cook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Novel competitors shape species' responses to climate change.

Authors:  Jake M Alexander; Jeffrey M Diez; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models.

Authors:  Jacopo Grilli; György Barabás; Matthew J Michalska-Smith; Stefano Allesina
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences.

Authors:  Oscar Godoy; Daniel B Stouffer; Nathan J B Kraft; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  On classifying interactions between populations.

Authors:  P A Abrams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levine; Jordi Bascompte; Peter B Adler; Stefano Allesina
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Foundation species influence trait-based community assembly.

Authors:  Christian Schöb; Bradley J Butterfield; Francisco I Pugnaire
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology.

Authors:  Leho Tedersoo; Mohammad Bahram; Martin Zobel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions.

Authors:  F Guillaume Blanchet; Kevin Cazelles; Dominique Gravel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  The structure of plant spatial association networks is linked to plant diversity in global drylands.

Authors:  Hugo Saiz; Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes; Juan Pablo Borda; Fernando T Maestre
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 6.256

View more
  4 in total

1.  Network-level containment of single-species bioengineering.

Authors:  Victor Maull; Ricard Solé
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Network ecology in dynamic landscapes.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Fortin; Mark R T Dale; Chris Brimacombe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Biodiversity and community structure.

Authors:  György Barabás
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Mycoheterotrophic plants preferentially target arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that are highly connected to autotrophic plants.

Authors:  Sofia I F Gomes; Miguel A Fortuna; Jordi Bascompte; Vincent S F T Merckx
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 10.323

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.