| Literature DB >> 33526488 |
Jian Xu1, Paul J Converse1, Anna M Upton2, Khisimuzi Mdluli2, Nader Fotouhi2, Eric L Nuermberger3,4.
Abstract
Since its conditional approval in 2012, bedaquiline (BDQ) has been a valuable tool for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. More recently, a novel short-course regimen combining BDQ with pretomanid and linezolid won approval to treat highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. Clinical reports of emerging BDQ resistance have identified mutations in Rv0678 that derepress the expression of the MmpL5/MmpS5 efflux transporter as the most common cause. Because the effect of these mutations on bacterial susceptibility to BDQ is relatively small (e.g., 2 to 8× MIC shift), increasing the BDQ dose would increase antibacterial activity but also pose potential safety concerns, including QTc prolongation. Substitution of BDQ with another diarylquinoline with superior potency and/or safety has the potential to overcome these limitations. TBAJ-587 has greater in vitro potency than BDQ, including against Rv0678 mutants, and may offer a larger safety margin. Using a mouse model of tuberculosis and different doses of BDQ and TBAJ-587, we found that against wild-type M. tuberculosis H37Rv and an isogenic Rv0678 mutant, TBAJ-587 has greater efficacy against both strains than BDQ, whether alone or in combination with pretomanid and either linezolid or moxifloxacin and pyrazinamide. TBAJ-587 also reduced the emergence of resistance to diarylquinolines and pretomanid.Entities:
Keywords: drug resistance; linezolid; moxifloxacin; pretomanid; pyrazinamide
Year: 2021 PMID: 33526488 PMCID: PMC8097419 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02418-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1TBAJ-587 (S) is more active than bedaquiline (B) either alone or in combination with pretomanid and linezolid (PaL) or pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide (PaMZ) against wild-type M. tuberculosis. (A) Activity of different regimens during the first month of treatment. (B) Activity of diarylquinoline monotherapy during 2 months of treatment.
FIG 2TBAJ-587 (S) is more active than bedaquiline (B) either alone or in combination with pretomanid and linezolid (PaL) or pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide (PaMZ) against M. tuberculosis with an Rv0678 mutation. Activity of the indicated regimens at M1 (A) and M2 (B).
Proportion of mice showing resistance to BDQ and PMD after infection with wild-type M. tuberculosis and antimicrobial treatment
| Drug (dose [mg/kg]) | Proportion of mice with detectable BDQ- or PMD-resistant subpopulations (mean frequency of resistant CFU among all CFU recovered) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | |||||||
| Monotherapy | DARQ combined with PaL | DARQ combined with PaMZ | Monotherapy | DARQ combined with PaL | ||||
| BDQ resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | BDQ resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | |
| None | NT | 5/5 (8.7 × 10−5) | NT | 4/5 (4.5 × 10−3) | NT | NT | NT | NT |
| BDQ (25) | 5/5 (2.9 × 10−2) | 3/5 (8.1 × 10−3) | 0/5 | 1/5 (1.8 × 10−1) | NT | 5/5 (1.8 × 10−1) | NT | NT |
| TBAJ-587 (25) | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | NT | 1/5 (3.3 × 10−1) | NT | NT |
| TBAJ-587 (50) | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | NT | 0/5 | NT | NT |
Abbreviations: BDQ, bedaquiline; PMD and Pa, pretomanid; L, linezolid; M, moxifloxacin; Z, pyrazinamide; M1 and M2, months of treatment; NT, not tested.
Reported frequency includes only mice in which resistant subpopulations were detected.
Proportion of mice showing resistance to BDQ and PMD after infection with M. tuberculosis containing am Rv0678 mutation and antimicrobial treatment
| Drug (dose [mg/kg]) | Proportion of mice with detectable BDQ- or PMD-resistant subpopulations (mean frequency of resistant CFU among all CFU recovered) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | |||||||||
| Monotherapy | DARQ combined with PaL | DARQ combined with PaMZ | Monotherapy | DARQ combined with PaL | DARQ combined with PaMZ | |||||
| BDQ resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | BDQ resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | BDQ resistant | PMD resistant | |
| None | NT | 2/5 (1.4 × 10−6) | NT | 0/5 | NT | NT | 0/5 | 5/5 (9.0 × 10−4) | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| BDQ (12.5) | 1/3 (1.9 × 10−7) | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT |
| BDQ (25) | 0/5 | 1/5 (2.7 × 10−5) | 5/5 (1.4 × 10−4) | 0/5 | NT | NT | 0/5 | 5/5 (6.1 × 10−2) | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| BDQ (50) | 0/5 | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT |
| TBAJ-587 (25) | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | NT | NT | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| TBAJ-587 (50) | 0/5 | 0/5 | 1/5 (3.6 × 10−3) | 0/5 | NT | NT | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
Abbreviations: BDQ, bedaquiline; PMD and Pa, pretomanid; L, linezolid; M, moxifloxacin; Z, pyrazinamide; M1 and M2, months of treatment; NT, not tested.
Reported frequency includes only mice in which resistant subpopulations were detected.