Henrik Wiegelmann1, Sarah Speller2, Lisa-Marie Verhaert3, Liane Schirra-Weirich3, Karin Wolf-Ostermann2. 1. Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany. hwiegelmann@uni-bremen.de. 2. Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany. 3. Department of Social Services, Centre for Participation Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia, Robert-Schuman-Straße 25, 52066, Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of persons living with dementia have an increased risk of adverse mental health effects. It is therefore important to systematically summarize published literature in order to find out which mental health interventions generate effective support for informal caregivers of persons living with dementia. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of intervention content, effectiveness and subgroup differentiation of mental health interventions for informal caregivers of persons with dementia living at home. METHOD: We searched four electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus and CINAHL) and included only methodically high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English or German language between 2009 and 2018. The intervention programmes focused on mental health of family caregivers. A narrative synthesis of the included studies is given. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications relating to 46 intervention programmes met the inclusion criteria. Burden, depression and quality of life (QoL) are the predominant parameters that were investigated. Twenty-five of forty-six interventions (54.3%) show positive effects on at least one of the outcomes examined. Most often, positive effects are reported for the outcome subjective burden (46.2%). Only six studies explicitly target on a certain subgroup of informal dementia caregivers (13%), whereas all other interventions (87%) target the group as a whole without differentiation. CONCLUSION: The most beneficial results were found for cognitive behavioural approaches, especially concerning the reduction of depressive symptoms. Besides this, leisure and physical activity interventions show some good results in reducing subjective caregiver burden. In order to improve effectiveness, research and practice may focus on developing more targeted interventions for special dementia informal caregiver subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of persons living with dementia have an increased risk of adverse mental health effects. It is therefore important to systematically summarize published literature in order to find out which mental health interventions generate effective support for informal caregivers of persons living with dementia. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of intervention content, effectiveness and subgroup differentiation of mental health interventions for informal caregivers of persons with dementia living at home. METHOD: We searched four electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus and CINAHL) and included only methodically high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English or German language between 2009 and 2018. The intervention programmes focused on mental health of family caregivers. A narrative synthesis of the included studies is given. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications relating to 46 intervention programmes met the inclusion criteria. Burden, depression and quality of life (QoL) are the predominant parameters that were investigated. Twenty-five of forty-six interventions (54.3%) show positive effects on at least one of the outcomes examined. Most often, positive effects are reported for the outcome subjective burden (46.2%). Only six studies explicitly target on a certain subgroup of informal dementia caregivers (13%), whereas all other interventions (87%) target the group as a whole without differentiation. CONCLUSION: The most beneficial results were found for cognitive behavioural approaches, especially concerning the reduction of depressive symptoms. Besides this, leisure and physical activity interventions show some good results in reducing subjective caregiver burden. In order to improve effectiveness, research and practice may focus on developing more targeted interventions for special dementia informal caregiver subgroups.
Authors: Lisa D Van Mierlo; Franka J M Meiland; Henriëtte G Van der Roest; Rose-Marie Dröes Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Laura N Gitlin; Paul Arthur; Catherine Piersol; Virginia Hessels; Samuel S Wu; Yunfeng Dai; William C Mann Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Geoffrey Tremont; Jennifer D Davis; George D Papandonatos; Brian R Ott; Richard H Fortinsky; Pedro Gozalo; Mun Sang Yue; Kimberly Bryant; Christine Grover; Duane S Bishop Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-07-26 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Gill Livingston; Andrew Sommerlad; Vasiliki Orgeta; Sergi G Costafreda; Jonathan Huntley; David Ames; Clive Ballard; Sube Banerjee; Alistair Burns; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Claudia Cooper; Nick Fox; Laura N Gitlin; Robert Howard; Helen C Kales; Eric B Larson; Karen Ritchie; Kenneth Rockwood; Elizabeth L Sampson; Quincy Samus; Lon S Schneider; Geir Selbæk; Linda Teri; Naaheed Mukadam Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Linda Clare; Laura D Gamble; Anthony Martyr; Serena Sabatini; Sharon M Nelis; Catherine Quinn; Claire Pentecost; Christina Victor; Roy W Jones; Ian R Jones; Martin Knapp; Rachael Litherland; Robin G Morris; Jennifer M Rusted; Jeanette M Thom; Rachel Collins; Catherine Henderson; Fiona E Matthews Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 4.942
Authors: Jan Dreyer; Johannes Michael Bergmann; Kerstin Köhler; Iris Hochgraeber; Christiane Pinkert; Martina Roes; Jochen René Thyrian; Henrik Wiegelmann; Bernhard Holle Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 4.070