Literature DB >> 33525372

Rapid Multi-Hybridisation FISH Screening for Balanced Porcine Reciprocal Translocations Suggests a Much Higher Abnormality Rate Than Previously Appreciated.

Rebecca E O'Connor1, Lucas G Kiazim1, Claudia C Rathje1, Rebecca L Jennings1, Darren K Griffin1.   

Abstract

With demand rising, pigs are the world's leading source of meat protein; however significant economic loss and environmental damage can be incurred if boars used for artificial insemination (AI) are hypoprolific (sub-fertile). Growing evidence suggests that semen analysis is an unreliable tool for diagnosing hypoprolificacy, with litter size and farrowing rate being more applicable. Once such data are available, however, any affected boar will have been in service for some time, with significant financial and environmental losses incurred. Reciprocal translocations (RTs) are the leading cause of porcine hypoprolificacy, reportedly present in 0.47% of AI boars. Traditional standard karyotyping, however, relies on animal specific expertise and does not detect more subtle (cryptic) translocations. Previously, we reported development of a multiple hybridisation fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) strategy; here, we report on its use in 1641 AI boars. A total of 15 different RTs were identified in 69 boars, with four further animals XX/XY chimeric. Therefore, 4.5% had a chromosome abnormality (4.2% with an RT), a 0.88% incidence. Revisiting cases with both karyotype and FISH information, we reanalysed captured images, asking whether the translocation was detectable by karyotyping alone. The results suggest that chromosome translocations in boars may be significantly under-reported, thereby highlighting the need for pre-emptive screening by this method before a boar enters a breeding programme.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FISH; artificial insemination; fertility; hypoprolificacy; pig; reciprocal translocation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33525372      PMCID: PMC7911255          DOI: 10.3390/cells10020250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells        ISSN: 2073-4409            Impact factor:   6.600


  12 in total

1.  Chromosomal abnormalities in hypoprolific boars.

Authors:  A Pinton; A Ducos; H Berland; A Seguela; C Brun-Baronnat; A Darré; R Darré; A Schmitz; M Yerle
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility.

Authors:  M L W J Broekhuijse; E Šoštarić; H Feitsma; B M Gadella
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Breeding soundness evaluation and semen analysis for predicting bull fertility.

Authors:  J P Kastelic; J C Thundathil
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.005

4.  Machine learning to further improve the decision which boar ejaculates to process into artificial insemination doses.

Authors:  Claudia Kamphuis; Pascal Duenk; Roel Franciscus Veerkamp; Bram Visser; Gurnoor Singh; Annette Nigsch; Rudi Maria De Mol; Marleen Leonarda Wilhelmina Johanna Broekhuijse
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Artificial insemination in pigs today.

Authors:  R V Knox
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Cytogenetic screening of livestock populations in Europe: an overview.

Authors:  A Ducos; T Revay; A Kovacs; A Hidas; A Pinton; A Bonnet-Garnier; L Molteni; E Slota; M Switonski; M V Arruga; W A van Haeringen; I Nicolae; R Chaves; H Guedes-Pinto; M Andersson; L Iannuzzi
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Standard karyotype of the domestic pig. Committee for the Standardized Karyotype of the Domestic Pig.

Authors:  I Gustavsson
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Isolation of subtelomeric sequences of porcine chromosomes for translocation screening reveals errors in the pig genome assembly.

Authors:  R E O'Connor; G Fonseka; R Frodsham; A L Archibald; M Lawrie; G A Walling; D K Griffin
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Chromosomal imbalance in pigs showing a syndromic form of cleft palate.

Authors:  Alexander Grahofer; Anna Letko; Irene Monika Häfliger; Vidhya Jagannathan; Alain Ducos; Olivia Richard; Vanessa Peter; Heiko Nathues; Cord Drögemüller
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Chromosomal control of pig populations in France: 2002-2006 survey.

Authors:  Alain Ducos; Hélène-Marie Berland; Nathalie Bonnet; Anne Calgaro; Sébastien Billoux; Nicolas Mary; Amélie Garnier-Bonnet; Roland Darré; Alain Pinton
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Economic Burden of Chromosome Translocations and the Benefits of Enhanced Screening for Cattle Breeding.

Authors:  Nicole M Lewis; Carla Canedo-Ribeiro; Claudia C Rathje; Rebecca L Jennings; Maxim Danihel; Lisa M Bosman; Giuseppe Silvestri; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  Clinical Cytogenetics of the Dog: A Review.

Authors:  Izabela Szczerbal; Marek Switonski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.