Literature DB >> 18467823

Cytogenetic screening of livestock populations in Europe: an overview.

A Ducos1, T Revay, A Kovacs, A Hidas, A Pinton, A Bonnet-Garnier, L Molteni, E Slota, M Switonski, M V Arruga, W A van Haeringen, I Nicolae, R Chaves, H Guedes-Pinto, M Andersson, L Iannuzzi.   

Abstract

Clinical animal cytogenetics development began in the 1960's, almost at the same time as human cytogenetics. However, the development of the two disciplines has been very different during the last four decades. Clinical animal cytogenetics reached its 'Golden Age' at the end of the 1980's. The majority of the laboratories, as well as the main screening programs in farm animal species, presented in this review, were implemented during that period, under the guidance of some historical leaders, the first of whom was Ingemar Gustavsson. Over the past 40 years, hundreds of scientific publications reporting original chromosomal abnormalities generally associated with clinical disorders (mainly fertility impairment) have been published. Since the 1980's, the number of scientists involved in clinical animal cytogenetics has drastically decreased for different reasons and the activities in that field are now concentrated in only a few laboratories (10 to 15, mainly in Europe), some of which have become highly specialized. Currently between 8,000 and 10,000 chromosomal analyses are carried out each year worldwide, mainly in cattle, pigs, and horses. About half of these analyses are performed in one French laboratory. Accurate estimates of the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in some populations are now available. For instance, one phenotypically normal pig in 200 controlled in France carries a structural chromosomal rearrangement. The frequency of the widespread 1;29 Robertsonian translocation in cattle has greatly decreased in most countries, but remains rather high in certain breeds (up to 20-25% in large beef cattle populations, even higher in some local breeds). The continuation, and in some instances the development of the chromosomal screening programs in farm animal populations allowed the implementation of new and original scientific projects, aimed at exploring some basic questions in the fields of chromosome and/or cell biology, thanks to easier access to interesting biological materials (germ cells, gametes, embryos ...). Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18467823     DOI: 10.1159/000118738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  29 in total

1.  Genomic analysis of cattle rob(1;29).

Authors:  Lisa De Lorenzi; Viviana Genualdo; Stefania Gimelli; Elena Rossi; Angela Perucatti; Alessandra Iannuzzi; Michele Zannotti; Luca Malagutti; Luciano Molteni; Leopoldo Iannuzzi; Pietro Parma
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  A novel mutation in the maternally imprinted PEG3 domain results in a loss of MIMT1 expression and causes abortions and stillbirths in cattle (Bos taurus).

Authors:  Krzysztof Flisikowski; Heli Venhoranta; Joanna Nowacka-Woszuk; Stephanie D McKay; Antti Flyckt; Juhani Taponen; Robert Schnabel; Hermann Schwarzenbacher; Izabela Szczerbal; Hannes Lohi; Ruedi Fries; Jeremy F Taylor; Marek Switonski; Magnus Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development and application of camelid molecular cytogenetic tools.

Authors:  Felipe Avila; Pranab J Das; Michelle Kutzler; Elaine Owens; Polina Perelman; Jiri Rubes; Miroslav Hornak; Warren E Johnson; Terje Raudsepp
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  Development of a sequential multicolor-FISH approach with 13 chromosome-specific painting probes for the rapid identification of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis, 2n = 50) chromosomes.

Authors:  Alfredo Pauciullo; Angela Perucatti; Alessandra Iannuzzi; Domenico Incarnato; Viviana Genualdo; Dino Di Berardino; Leopoldo Iannuzzi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Classical, Molecular, and Genomic Cytogenetics of the Pig, a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Brendan Donaldson; Daniel A F Villagomez; W Allan King
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Copy number variations in high and low fertility breeding boars.

Authors:  Tamas Revay; Anh T Quach; Laurence Maignel; Brian Sullivan; W Allan King
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Sperm nuclear architecture is locally modified in presence of a Robertsonian translocation t(13;17).

Authors:  Hervé Acloque; Amélie Bonnet-Garnier; Florence Mompart; Alain Pinton; Martine Yerle-Bouissou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Analysis of the Robertsonian (1;29) fusion in Bovinae reveals a common mechanism: insights into its clinical occurrence and chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  A Escudeiro; F Adega; T J Robinson; J S Heslop-Harrison; R Chaves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Meiotic recombination analyses of individual chromosomes in male domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Nicolas Mary; Harmonie Barasc; Stéphane Ferchaud; Yvon Billon; Frédéric Meslier; David Robelin; Anne Calgaro; Anne-Marie Loustau-Dudez; Nathalie Bonnet; Martine Yerle; Hervé Acloque; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Meiotic Recombination Analyses in Pigs Carrying Different Balanced Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  Nicolas Mary; Harmonie Barasc; Stéphane Ferchaud; Aurélia Priet; Anne Calgaro; Anne-Marie Loustau-Dudez; Nathalie Bonnet; Martine Yerle; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.