Literature DB >> 33524670

Inhalation of two Prop 65-listed chemicals within vehicles may be associated with increased cancer risk.

Aalekhya Reddam1, David C Volz2.   

Abstract

Chemicals are listed on California's Proposition 65 (Prop 65) for their potential to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, and certain chemicals from this list are often detected within interior vehicle dust and air. Therefore, this study examined the potential risk associated with five Prop 65-listed chemicals detected within vehicle interiors: benzene, formaldehyde, di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TDCIPP). Exposure estimates based on time spent within a vehicle were derived from a meta-analysis of estimated concentrations from the literature. Regulatory levels established by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) were then used to generate percent reference doses (%RfDs) for chemical-specific daily doses as well as determine the probability of risk (exceedance probability) as a function of %RfD for each chemical-specific daily dose. Based on our meta-analysis, benzene and formaldehyde were detected in vehicle interior air whereas DEHP, DBP and TDCIPP were detected in vehicle interior dust. Benzene and formaldehyde were the only two chemicals with an estimated %RfD > 100 across any of the commute times. For commute times of 20 min or longer, the %RfD was > 100 for maximum exposures based on the "maximum allowable daily level" for benzene, and for 95th-percentile exposures based on the "no significant risk level" for benzene and formaldehyde. Furthermore, the probability of exceeding 100% RfD was highest for cancer risks associated with benzene, followed by cancer risks associated with formaldehyde and the risk of reproductive and developmental toxicity associated with benzene. Lastly, within the entire state of California, the percent of commuters with a 10% probability of exceeding cancer risk associated with benzene or formaldehyde exposure was 78% and 63%, respectively. Overall, our study raises concerns about the potential risk associated with inhalation of benzene and formaldehyde for people who spend a significant amount of time in their vehicles, an issue that is especially pertinent to traffic-congested areas where people have longer commutes.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benzene; Cancer risk; Formaldehyde; Human; Inhalation; Vehicle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33524670      PMCID: PMC7897270          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  56 in total

1.  Benzene and the dose-related incidence of hematologic neoplasms in China. Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine--National Cancer Institute Benzene Study Group.

Authors:  R B Hayes; S N Yin; M Dosemeci; G L Li; S Wacholder; L B Travis; C Y Li; N Rothman; R N Hoover; M S Linet
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Legacy and emerging organophosphοrus flame retardants in car dust from Greece: Implications for human exposure.

Authors:  Christina Christia; Giulia Poma; Athanasios Besis; Constantini Samara; Adrian Covaci
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Organophosphate flame retardants in the indoor air and dust in cars in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Tokumura; Rurika Hatayama; Kouichi Tatsu; Toshiyuki Naito; Tetsuya Takeda; Mohammad Raknuzzaman; Md Habibullah -Al-Mamun; Shigeki Masunaga
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Carcinogenesis Bioassay of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (CAS No. 117-81-7) in F344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies).

Authors: 
Journal:  Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1982-03

5.  Increased risk of lung cancer among different types of professional drivers in Denmark.

Authors:  J Hansen; O Raaschou-Nielsen; J H Olsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Phthalates: toxicology and exposure.

Authors:  Ursel Heudorf; Volker Mersch-Sundermann; Jürgen Angerer
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Sources and human exposure implications of concentrations of organophosphate flame retardants in dust from UK cars, classrooms, living rooms, and offices.

Authors:  Sandra Brommer; Stuart Harrad
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Analyses on influencing factors of airborne VOCS pollution in taxi cabins.

Authors:  Xiaokai Chen; Lili Feng; Huilong Luo; Heming Cheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Indoor Air Pollution in Cars: An Update on Novel Insights.

Authors:  Nicole Zulauf; Janis Dröge; Doris Klingelhöfer; Markus Braun; Gerhard M Oremek; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies.

Authors:  Susanna D Mitro; Robin E Dodson; Veena Singla; Gary Adamkiewicz; Angelo F Elmi; Monica K Tilly; Ami R Zota
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Scent in Motion: On the Multiple Uses of Ambient Scent in the Context of Passenger Transport.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.