Literature DB >> 33523251

Developmental validation of the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit, an all-in-one multiplex system for forensic applications.

Ran Li1,2, Xuefeng Shen1,2, Hui Chen1,2, Dan Peng1,2, Riga Wu1,2, Hongyu Sun3,4.   

Abstract

Analyzing genetic markers in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes is helpful in various forensic applications, such as individual identifications and kinship analyses. However, most commercial kits detect these markers separately, which is time-consuming, laborious, and more error-prone (mislabelling, contamination, ...). The MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit (hereinafter "MGIEasy identification system"; MGI Tech, Shenzhen, China) has been designed to provide a simple, fast, and robust way to detect appropriate markers in one multiplex PCR reaction: 52 autosomal STRs, 27 X-chromosomal STRs, 48 Y-chromosomal STRs, 145 identity-informative SNPs, 53 ancestry-informative SNPs, 29 phenotype-informative SNPs, and the hypervariable regions of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Here, we validated the performance of MGIEasy identification system following the guidelines of the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM), assessing species specificity, sensitivity, mixture identification, stability under non-optimal conditions (degraded samples, inhibitor contamination, and various substrates), repeatability, and concordance. Libraries prepared using MGIEasy identification system were sequenced on a MGISEQ-2000 instrument (MGI Tech). MGIEasy-derived STR, SNP, and mtDNA genotypes were highly concordant with CE-based STR genotypes (99.79%), MiSeq FGx-based SNP genotypes (99.78%), and Sanger-based mtDNA genotypes (100%), respectively. This system was strongly human-specific, resistant to four common PCR inhibitors, and reliably amplified both low quantities of DNA (as low as 0.125 ng) and degraded DNA (~ 150 nt). Most of the unique alleles from the minor contributor were detected in 1:10 male-female and male-male mixtures; some minor Y-STR alleles were even detected in 1:1000 male-female mixtures. MGIEasy also successfully directly amplified markers from blood stains on FTA cards, filter papers, and swabs. Thus, our results demonstrated that MGIEasy identification system was suitable for use in forensic analyses due to its robust and reliable performance on samples of varying quality and quantity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autosomal DNA; MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit; Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA); Short tandem repeat (STR); Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); Validation; X-chromosomal DNA; Y-chromosomal DNA

Year:  2021        PMID: 33523251     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02507-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  48 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Analysis - Validation and Use for Forensic Casework.

Authors:  M M Holland; T J Parsons
Journal:  Forensic Sci Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs.

Authors:  António Amorim; Luísa Pereira
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Evaluation of advanced multiplex short tandem repeat systems in pairwise kinship analysis.

Authors:  Tomonori Tamura; Motoki Osawa; Eriko Ochiai; Takanori Suzuki; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 1.376

4.  Exploring the ancestry differentiation and inference capacity of the 28-plex AISNPs.

Authors:  Wei-Qi Hao; Jing Liu; Li Jiang; Jun-Ping Han; Ling Wang; Jiu-Ling Li; Quan Ma; Chao Liu; Hui-Jun Wang; Cai-Xia Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Haplotype diversity in mitochondrial DNA hypervariable region in a population of southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  C Fridman; R S Gonzalez; A C Pereira; M M S G Cardena
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 6.  A review of bioinformatic methods for forensic DNA analyses.

Authors:  Yao-Yuan Liu; SallyAnn Harbison
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 7.  Testing for parentage and kinship.

Authors:  Robert E Wenk
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.284

8.  STRs vs. SNPs: thoughts on the future of forensic DNA testing.

Authors:  John M Butler; Michael D Coble; Peter M Vallone
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.007

9.  The problem of single parent/child paternity analysis--practical results involving 336 children and 348 unrelated men.

Authors:  Micaela Poetsch; Christina Lüdcke; Antje Repenning; Lutz Fischer; Victoria Mályusz; Eva Simeoni; Eberhard Lignitz; Manfred Oehmichen; Nicole von Wurmb-Schwark
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Likelihood evaluation using 15 common short tandem repeat loci: a practical and simulated approach to establishing personal identification via sibling/parental assessments.

Authors:  Keiji Tamaki; Richard H Kaszynski; Qing-Hua Yuan; Koichi Yoshida; Tomoko Okuno; Tatsuaki Tsuruyama
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  2 in total

1.  Forensic Feature Exploration and Comprehensive Genetic Insights Into Yugu Ethnic Minority and Northern Han Population via a Novel NGS-Based Marker Set.

Authors:  Qiong Lan; Congying Zhao; Chong Chen; Hui Xu; Yating Fang; Hongbing Yao; Bofeng Zhu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Haoliang Fan; Lingxiang Wang; Changhui Liu; Xiaoyu Lu; Xuding Xu; Kai Ru; Pingming Qiu; Chao Liu; Shao-Qing Wen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.791

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.