Rozalina G McCoy1,2,3, Holly K Van Houten2,3, Yihong Deng2,3, Pinar Karaca Mandic4,5, Joseph S Ross6,7,8,9, Victor M Montori10,11, Nilay D Shah2,3,12. 1. Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Department of Finance and Medical Industry Leadership Institute, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 5. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 6. National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 7. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 8. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. 9. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut. 10. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 11. Knowledge Evaluation Research Unit, Rochester, Minnesota. 12. OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, and postmarketing trials of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i demonstrated that these medications improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. Objective: To compare trends in initiation of treatment with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i by older adults with type 2 diabetes insured by Medicare Advantage vs commercial health plans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from a deidentified database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Adults aged 58 to 66 years with type 2 diabetes who filled any medication prescription to lower glucose levels from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were compared between groups. Exposure: Enrollment in a Medicare Advantage or commercial health insurance plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The odds of initiating GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment were examined for Medicare Advantage vs commercial insurance beneficiaries using 3 separate logistic regression models adjusted for year and demographic and clinical factors. These models were used to calculate adjusted annual rates of medication initiation by health plan. Results: A total of 382 574 adults with pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetes (52.9% men; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [2.7] years) were identified, including 172 180 Medicare Advantage and 210 394 commercial beneficiaries. From 2016 to 2019, adjusted rates of initiation of GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment increased among all beneficiaries, from 2.14% to 20.02% for GLP-1RA among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.50% to 11.44% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; from 2.74% to 18.15% for SGLT2i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.57% to 8.51% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; and from 3.30% to 11.71% for DPP-4i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 2.44% to 7.68% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Initiation rates for all 3 drug classes were consistently lower among Medicare Advantage than among commercial insurance beneficiaries. Within each calendar year, the odds of initiating GLP-1RA treatment ranged from 0.28 (95% CI, 0.26-0.29) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) for Medicare Advantage and commercial insurance beneficiaries, respectively; SGLT2i, from 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20-0.22) to 0.57 (95% CI, 0.53-0.61), respectively; and DPP-4i, from 0.37 (95% CI, 0.34-0.39) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78), respectively (P < .001 for all). The odds of starting GLP-1RA and SGLT2i increased with income; for an income of $200 000 and higher vs less than $40 000, the odds ratio for GLP-1RA was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.15-1.32) and for SGLT2i was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.24). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries may be less likely than commercially insured beneficiaries to be treated with newer medications to lower glucose levels, with greater disparities among lower-income patients. Better understanding of nonclinical factors contributing to treatment decisions and efforts to promote greater equity in diabetes management appear to be needed.
Importance: Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, and postmarketing trials of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i demonstrated that these medications improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. Objective: To compare trends in initiation of treatment with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i by older adults with type 2 diabetes insured by Medicare Advantage vs commercial health plans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from a deidentified database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Adults aged 58 to 66 years with type 2 diabetes who filled any medication prescription to lower glucose levels from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were compared between groups. Exposure: Enrollment in a Medicare Advantage or commercial health insurance plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The odds of initiating GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment were examined for Medicare Advantage vs commercial insurance beneficiaries using 3 separate logistic regression models adjusted for year and demographic and clinical factors. These models were used to calculate adjusted annual rates of medication initiation by health plan. Results: A total of 382 574 adults with pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetes (52.9% men; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [2.7] years) were identified, including 172 180 Medicare Advantage and 210 394 commercial beneficiaries. From 2016 to 2019, adjusted rates of initiation of GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment increased among all beneficiaries, from 2.14% to 20.02% for GLP-1RA among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.50% to 11.44% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; from 2.74% to 18.15% for SGLT2i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.57% to 8.51% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; and from 3.30% to 11.71% for DPP-4i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 2.44% to 7.68% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Initiation rates for all 3 drug classes were consistently lower among Medicare Advantage than among commercial insurance beneficiaries. Within each calendar year, the odds of initiating GLP-1RA treatment ranged from 0.28 (95% CI, 0.26-0.29) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) for Medicare Advantage and commercial insurance beneficiaries, respectively; SGLT2i, from 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20-0.22) to 0.57 (95% CI, 0.53-0.61), respectively; and DPP-4i, from 0.37 (95% CI, 0.34-0.39) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78), respectively (P < .001 for all). The odds of starting GLP-1RA and SGLT2i increased with income; for an income of $200 000 and higher vs less than $40 000, the odds ratio for GLP-1RA was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.15-1.32) and for SGLT2i was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.24). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries may be less likely than commercially insured beneficiaries to be treated with newer medications to lower glucose levels, with greater disparities among lower-income patients. Better understanding of nonclinical factors contributing to treatment decisions and efforts to promote greater equity in diabetes management appear to be needed.
Authors: Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Dara H Sorkin; John Billimek; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephen D Wiviott; Itamar Raz; Marc P Bonaca; Ofri Mosenzon; Eri T Kato; Avivit Cahn; Michael G Silverman; Thomas A Zelniker; Julia F Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Christian T Ruff; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Martin Fredriksson; Peter A Johansson; Anna-Maria Langkilde; Marc S Sabatine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Christoph Wanner; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Erich Bluhmki; Stefan Hantel; Michaela Mattheus; Theresa Devins; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christoph Wanner; Silvio E Inzucchi; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Maximilian von Eynatten; Michaela Mattheus; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Bernard Zinman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adrian F Hernandez; Jennifer B Green; Salim Janmohamed; Ralph B D'Agostino; Christopher B Granger; Nigel P Jones; Lawrence A Leiter; Anne E Rosenberg; Kristina N Sigmon; Matthew C Somerville; Karl M Thorpe; John J V McMurray; Stefano Del Prato Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Silvio E Inzucchi; John M Lachin; Christoph Wanner; David Fitchett; Sven Kohler; Michaela Mattheus; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Odd Erik Johansen; Gregory W Albers; Hans Christoph Diener Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Tianna Zhou; Patrick Liu; Sanket S Dhruva; Nilay D Shah; Reshma Ramachandran; Karina M Berg; Joseph S Ross Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 44.409
Authors: Rodolfo J Galindo; Mohammed K Ali; Shealeigh A Funni; Andrew B Dodge; Shaheen S Kurani; Nilay D Shah; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Rozalina G McCoy Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Chelsea E Hawley; Julie C Lauffenburger; Julie M Paik; Deborah J Wexler; Seoyoung C Kim; Elisabetta Patorno Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jing Luo; Robert Feldman; Scott Rothenberger; Mary Korytkowski; Michael A Fischer; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Jennifer L Ridgeway; Megan E Branda; Derek Gravholt; Juan P Brito; Ian G Hargraves; Sandra A Hartasanchez; Aaron L Leppin; Yvonne L Gomez; Devin M Mann; Vivek Nautiyal; Randal J Thomas; Emma M Behnken; Victor D Torres Roldan; Nilay D Shah; Charanjit S Khurana; Victor M Montori Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-04-21
Authors: Rozalina G McCoy; Rodolfo J Galindo; Kavya Sindhu Swarna; Holly K Van Houten; Patrick J O'Connor; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Nilay D Shah Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Alexander C Falkentoft; Julie Andersen; Mariam Elmegaard Malik; Christian Selmer; Peter Haulund Gæde; Peter Bisgaard Staehr; Mark A Hlatky; Emil Fosbøl; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar H Gislason; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Morten Schou; Niels E Bruun; Anne-Christine Ruwald Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: Rozalina G McCoy; Holly K Van Houten; Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Joseph S Ross; Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 17.152