Rozalina G McCoy1,2, Holly K Van Houten2,3, Pinar Karaca-Mandic4,5, Joseph S Ross6,7,8,9, Victor M Montori10,11, Nilay D Shah2,3. 1. Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN mccoy.rozalina@mayo.edu. 2. Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN. 3. OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, MN. 4. Department of Finance and Medical Industry Leadership Institute, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 5. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. 6. National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 7. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 8. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT. 9. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT. 10. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 11. Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are preferentially initiated among patients with cardiovascular disease, heart failure (HF), or nephropathy, where these drug classes have established benefit, compared with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), for which corresponding benefits have not been demonstrated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed claims of adults with type 2 diabetes included in OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a deidentified database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, who first started GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, or DPP-4i therapy between 2016 and 2019. Using multinomial logistic regression, we examined the relative risk ratios (RRR) of starting GLP-1RA and SGLT2i compared with DPP-4i for those with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular disease, HF, and nephropathy after adjusting for demographic and other clinical factors. RESULTS: We identified 75,395 patients who started GLP-1RA, 58,234 who started SGLT2i, and 91,884 who started DPP-4i. Patients with prior MI, cerebrovascular disease, or nephropathy were less likely to start GLP-1RA rather than DPP-4i compared with patients without these conditions (RRR 0.83 [95% CI 0.78-0.88] for MI, RRR 0.77 [0.74-0.81] for cerebrovascular disease, and RRR 0.87 [0.84-0.91] for nephropathy). Patients with HF or nephropathy were less likely to start SGLT2i (RRR 0.83 [0.80-0.87] for HF and RRR 0.57 [0.55-0.60] for nephropathy). Both medication classes were less likely to be started by non-White and older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cardiovascular disease, HF, and nephropathy, for whom evidence suggests a greater likelihood of benefiting from GLP-1RA and/or SGLT2i therapy, were less likely to start these drugs. Addressing this treatment/benefit paradox, which was most pronounced in non-White and older patients, may help reduce the morbidity associated with these conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are preferentially initiated among patients with cardiovascular disease, heart failure (HF), or nephropathy, where these drug classes have established benefit, compared with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), for which corresponding benefits have not been demonstrated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed claims of adults with type 2 diabetes included in OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a deidentified database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, who first started GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, or DPP-4i therapy between 2016 and 2019. Using multinomial logistic regression, we examined the relative risk ratios (RRR) of starting GLP-1RA and SGLT2i compared with DPP-4i for those with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular disease, HF, and nephropathy after adjusting for demographic and other clinical factors. RESULTS: We identified 75,395 patients who started GLP-1RA, 58,234 who started SGLT2i, and 91,884 who started DPP-4i. Patients with prior MI, cerebrovascular disease, or nephropathy were less likely to start GLP-1RA rather than DPP-4i compared with patients without these conditions (RRR 0.83 [95% CI 0.78-0.88] for MI, RRR 0.77 [0.74-0.81] for cerebrovascular disease, and RRR 0.87 [0.84-0.91] for nephropathy). Patients with HF or nephropathy were less likely to start SGLT2i (RRR 0.83 [0.80-0.87] for HF and RRR 0.57 [0.55-0.60] for nephropathy). Both medication classes were less likely to be started by non-White and older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cardiovascular disease, HF, and nephropathy, for whom evidence suggests a greater likelihood of benefiting from GLP-1RA and/or SGLT2i therapy, were less likely to start these drugs. Addressing this treatment/benefit paradox, which was most pronounced in non-White and older patients, may help reduce the morbidity associated with these conditions.
Authors: Alan J Garber; Martin J Abrahamson; Joshua I Barzilay; Lawrence Blonde; Zachary T Bloomgarden; Michael A Bush; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Ralph A DeFronzo; Daniel Einhorn; Vivian A Fonseca; Jeffrey R Garber; W Timothy Garvey; George Grunberger; Yehuda Handelsman; Irl B Hirsch; Paul S Jellinger; Janet B McGill; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Paul D Rosenblit; Guillermo E Umpierrez Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Kasia J Lipska; Patrick J O'Connor; Jennifer Y Liu; Howard H Moffet; Emily B Schroeder; Jean M Lawrence; Gregory A Nichols; Katherine M Newton; Ram D Pathak; Jay Desai; Beth Waitzfelder; Melissa G Butler; Abraham Thomas; John F Steiner Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Sandeep R Das; Brendan M Everett; Kim K Birtcher; Jenifer M Brown; James L Januzzi; Rita R Kalyani; Mikhail Kosiborod; Melissa Magwire; Pamela B Morris; Joshua J Neumiller; Laurence S Sperling Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Pei Gao; Nadeem Sarwar; Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai; Stephen Kaptoge; Peter H Whincup; Kenneth J Mukamal; Richard F Gillum; Ingar Holme; Inger Njølstad; Astrid Fletcher; Peter Nilsson; Sarah Lewington; Rory Collins; Vilmundur Gudnason; Simon G Thompson; Naveed Sattar; Elizabeth Selvin; Frank B Hu; John Danesh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francisco Javier Garjón; Ana Azparren; Iván Vergara; Borja Azaola; Jose Ramón Loayssa Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Hsien-Yen Chang; Jonathan P Weiner; Thomas M Richards; Sara N Bleich; Jodi B Segal Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Jong Ha Baek; Ye Seul Yang; Seung-Hyun Ko; Kyung Do Han; Jae Hyeon Kim; Min Kyong Moon; Jong Suk Park; Byung-Wan Lee; Tae Jung Oh; Suk Chon; Jong Han Choi; Kyu Yeon Hur Journal: Diabetes Metab J Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 5.893