Literature DB >> 33520805

Diagnostic validity of the pre-diabetes scale among at-risk rural Iranian adults for screening for pre-diabetes.

Leila Jahangiry1,2, Tahereh Shamizadeh1, Parvin Sarbakhsh3, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi4, Koen Ponnet5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An intense increase in pre-diabetes has taken place among the worldwide population each year. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic validity of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) screening questionnaire for identifying pre-diabetes in the Iranian rural population.
METHODS: This study was conducted in Ahar County, East Azarbaijan, Iran. The participants (n = 440) were randomly recruited via trained community health care workers. The ADA questionnaire including six items (age, gender, having family members with diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and physical activity) is the screening tool used to identify people at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes. The World Health Organization (WHO) forward/backward translation protocol was used for translating the assessment tool. The diagnosis of pre-diabetes was defined based on the fasting blood glucose (FBG, as a gold standard) cut-points of 100 mg/dl to 125 mg/dl. We assessed the criterion validity and diagnosis characteristics of the ADA questionnaire in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes using the measures of sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. In addition, the optimal cut-point of the ADA questionnaire for the diagnosis of pre-diabetes was computed using Youden's index.
RESULTS: A total of 440 adults ages 30-65 years (Mage = 48.8 years, SDage = 11.2 years) were included in the study. Around half of the participants were women (50%), illiterate (51.4%), and married (85.2). In the pre-diabetes diagnosis scale, the present cut-point yielded a sensitivity of 98.7 (95% CI:96.6-99.6), specificity of 53.1 (95% CI: 44.6-61.5), positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.4 (95% CI:77-85.3), positive predictive value (NPV) of 95.0 (95% CI:87.7-98.6), and accuracy of 83.9 (95% CI:81.4-89.2) with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80 - 0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: The Persian version of the ADA questionnaire had good sensitivity and fair specificity for pre-diabetes diagnosis among rural adults at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes. The study provided evidence for the ADA questionnaire as a valid and reliable tool for identifying pre-diabetes in a rural area. Identifying rural residents in the early stage of developing diabetes with a simple and accurate instrument without the need for a FBG test contributes to controlling the disease in areas with limited access to health services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is not a trial; the registration number is not applicable. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Diagnosis; Pre-diabetes; Scale

Year:  2020        PMID: 33520805      PMCID: PMC7843659          DOI: 10.1007/s40200-020-00568-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord        ISSN: 2251-6581


  29 in total

Review 1.  Screening for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M M Engelgau; K M Narayan; W H Herman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The projected health care burden of Type 2 diabetes in the UK from 2000 to 2060.

Authors:  A Bagust; P K Hopkinson; L Maslove; C J Currie
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 3.  Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Rachel Huxley; Federica Barzi; Mark Woodward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-21

4.  Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Diabetes Care in Iran: Where We Stand and Where We Are Headed.

Authors:  Sina Noshad; Mohsen Afarideh; Behnam Heidari; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Alireza Esteghamati
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.462

6.  Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus, pre-diabetes, undiagnosed and uncontrolled diabetes and its predictors in general population aged 15 to 75 years: A community-based study (KERCADRS) in southeastern Iran.

Authors:  Hamid Najafipour; Mojgan Sanjari; Mostafa Shokoohi; Ali-Akbar Haghdoost; Mehdi Afshari; Mitra Shadkam; Koorosh Etemad; Ali Mirzazade
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.006

7.  Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence.

Authors:  James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; Lawrence E Barker; David F Williamson
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-10-22

8.  Diabetes Risk Calculator: a simple tool for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes.

Authors:  Kenneth E Heikes; David M Eddy; Bhakti Arondekar; Leonard Schlessinger
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.

Authors:  Koffi Alouki; Hélène Delisle; Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; Mira Johri
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.