Literature DB >> 33520797

Design and psychometric evaluation of self-care behavior assessment tool in diabetic patients.

Davood RobatSarpooshi1, Ali Taghipour2,3, Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh4, Saki Azadeh3,5, Jafari AliReza6, Nooshin Peyman3,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE S: Diabetes is the most common metabolic disease with an increasing prevalence throughout the world due to the changes in lifestyle. Appropriate self-care promotes the life condition of people with chronic illnesses and reduces the side effects of such diseases, so this study was designed to develop a scale for evaluating self-care in middle-aged patients diabetes.
METHODS: In this methodological study, the following 4 steps were conducted for design and psychometric measurement of the questionnaire: 1) Data collection was carried out during a supplementary cross-sectional survey of the qualitative study; 2) determining the face validity (the assessment of facility, difficulty, and ambiguity of the items and their importance for patients) and content validity of the questionnaire (the assessment of appropriateness and necessity of items by experts opinions and measuring CVR and CVI; 3) the internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the Cranach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.85), and 4) test-retest of the scale with a 2-weeks interval confirmed appropriate stability for the scale (ICC = 0.81). The normality of data was also evaluated using skewness and kurtosis. CFA was performed using AMOS version 24 software.
RESULTS: The first version of this questionnaire was produced with 71 items, of which 27 items were deleted during the process of validity and reliability confirmation. The final version of the questionnaire was provided with 44 items. For this study, 460 samples were used to examine the psychometric properties of the self-care scale.The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit to the data. Before the performing CFA, KMO and Bartlett's test of sphericity were evaluated and the results indicated an adequate sample (KMO = 0.956 and Bartlett's test: χ2 = 14,288.048, df = 946, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the designed questionnaire could assess self-care in patients with diabetes. This is a short, easy-to-use questionnaire that helps you understand what the patient needs to perform self-care behaviors. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment tool; Diabetes; Self-care

Year:  2020        PMID: 33520797      PMCID: PMC7843767          DOI: 10.1007/s40200-020-00549-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord        ISSN: 2251-6581


  12 in total

1.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Trends in the prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in association with obesity in Iran: 2005-2011.

Authors:  Alireza Esteghamati; Koorosh Etemad; Jalil Koohpayehzadeh; Mehrshad Abbasi; Alipasha Meysamie; Sina Noshad; Fereshteh Asgari; Mostafa Mousavizadeh; Ali Rafei; Elias Khajeh; Mohamadreza Neishaboury; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Manouchehr Nakhjavani
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Knowledge of diabetes mellitus among diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Klinik Kesihatan Seremban.

Authors:  C H Ding; C L Teng; C N Koh
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2006-10

4.  Obstacles which patients with type 2 diabetes meet while adhering to the therapeutic regimen in everyday life: qualitative study.

Authors:  Nevenka Vinter-Repalust; Goranka Petricek; Milica Katić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  The influence of treatment modality and ethnicity on attitudes in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J T Fitzgerald; L D Gruppen; R M Anderson; M M Funnell; S J Jacober; G Grunberger; L C Aman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Self-management support in "real-world" settings: an empowerment-based intervention.

Authors:  Tricia S Tang; Martha M Funnell; Morton B Brown; Jacob E Kurlander
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-11-03

7.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.

Authors:  Sarah Wild; Gojka Roglic; Anders Green; Richard Sicree; Hilary King
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Khalida Ismail; Kirsty Winkley; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  "They care but don't understand": family support of African American women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lori Carter-Edwards; Anne H Skelly; Carolyn Spence Cagle; Susan J Appel
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shanghai, China: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dongbo Fu; Hua Fu; Patrick McGowan; Yi-e Shen; Lizhen Zhu; Huiqin Yang; Jianguo Mao; Shitai Zhu; Yongming Ding; Zhihua Wei
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 9.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.