| Literature DB >> 33519087 |
Jielun Hu1,2,3, Lin Zhang1,2, Winnie Lin1,2,4, Whitney Tang1,2, Francis K L Chan1,2,4, Siew C Ng1,2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 exhibit diverse clinical manifestations and severity including enteric involvement. Commensal gut bacteria can contribute to defense against potential pathogens by promoting beneficial immune interactions. Interventions targeting the gut microbiome may have systemic anti-viral effects in SARS-CoV-2 infection. SCOPE AND APPROACH: To summarise alterations of gut microbiota in patients with COVID-19 including impact of specific bacteria on disease severity, discuss current knowledge on the role of probiotics, prebiotics and dietary approaches including vitamin D in preventing and reducing disease susceptibility and review clinical studies using probiotics to target coronavirus. A literature review on SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, gut microbiome and immunity was undertaken and relevant literature was summarised and critically examined. KEY FINDINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Diet; Nutrition; Prebiotics; Probiotics; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2020 PMID: 33519087 PMCID: PMC7833886 DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0924-2244 Impact factor: 12.563
Fig. 1Possible mechanisms of dysbiosis by SAR-CoV-2 virus infection and susceptible populations.
Fig. 2Interactions between the human gut and lung and potential positive immune response triggered by probiotics and prebiotics.
Natural foods containing high content of prebiotics (such as fibers, oligosaccharides) or probiotics (such as bifidobacterial and lactobacillus).
| Food Group (and their associated nutrients) | Specific Food to Consume |
|---|---|
| Whole grains (fibers, oligosaccharides, minerals, and vitamins) | whole wheat, barley, brown rice |
| Vegetables and fruits (fibers, oligosaccharides, and vitamins A, B, C, D, E, K) | most leafy vegetables, legumes, mushrooms, and fruits |
| Plant-based protein (soluble fibers and amino acids) | beans, tofu, chickpeas, lentils, nuts |
| Fiber-fortified food (oligosaccharides) | cereals, breads, drinks, supplements |
| Fermented dairy (bifidobacterial and lactobacillus) | yogurt, kefir, sweet acidophilus milk, buttermilk; cheese: cheddar, Gouda, mozzarella, and cottage |
| Fermented beans or vegetables (lactobacillus) | miso, sauerkraut, sour pickles soybeans (tempeh) |
Fig. 3Dietary and nutritional recommendations during COVID-19.
Ongoing clinical studies of probiotic intervention in COVID-19.
| Country | ClinicalTrials.gov ID | Study type | Study subjects | Age group | Sample size | Intervention | Dose | Duration | Primary outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | Open label RCT | COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization | ≥18 years | 40 | Dietary Supplement: Probiotic vs No intervention | 1 × 10∧9 CFU/day | 30 days | Cases with discharge to ICU | |
| Spain | Double-blind RCT | Healthcare workers without COVID-19 | ≥20 years | 314 | Probiotic (Lactobacillus) vs Control (Maltodextrin) | 3 × 10∧9 CFU/day | 8 weeks | Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers | |
| Italy | Single-blind RCT | COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization | ≥18 years | 152 | Standard of care (Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) vs | 1.2 × 10∧12 CFU/day | 21 days | Delta in the number of patients requiring orotracheal intubation despite treatment | |
| Austria | Double-blind RCT | COVID-19 patients with diarrhea | ≥18 years | 108 | Synbiotic (Omnibiotic AAD: 2 Bifidobacterium strains, Enterococcus, 7 Lactobacillus strains) vs Placebo | Not mentioned | 30 days | Duration of diarrhea | |
| United States | Double-blind RCT | People with household contact of COVID-19 patient | ≥1 year | 1000 | Probiotic ( | 2 capsules per day | 28 days | Changes in Shannon bacteria diversity | |
| Canada | Double-blind RCT | Healthy subjects without COVID-19 | 19–45 years old | 84 | bacTRL-Spike (Bifidobacterium engineered to deliver plasmids encoding spike protein from SARS-CoV-2) vs Placebo | 1 × 10∧9, 3 × 10∧9 or 1 × 10∧10 | 12 months | Frequency of adverse events (specifically including incidence of gastrointestinal-associated events) | |
| Italy | Retrospective Case-Control | COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization | ≥18 years | 70 | Standard of care (Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) vs | Not mentioned | 21 days | Delta of time of disappearance of acute diarrhea | |
| Mexico | RCT | COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization | 18–60 year old | 300 | Combination of | Not mentioned | 30 days | Severity progression of COVID-19, Stay at ICU, Mortality ratio. | |
| Hong Kong | Pilot study | COVID-19 Patients requiring hospitalization | ≥18 years | 50 | Synbiotic (CUHK-Synbiotic vs Standard care) | 2 × 10∧11 CFU/day | 28 days | Composite outcome of symptom score improvement within 4 weeks. | |
| Hong Kong | A single-arm, open-labelled interventional study | Recovered/Discharged COVID-19 patients | ≥18 years | 20 | Synbiotic (CUHK-Synbiotic) | 2 × 10∧11 CFU/day | 28 days | Changes in gut microbiome (bacteria, virome and fungome) at week 5 compared to baseline. |
The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong – New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee: CUHK-NTEC CREC.