| Literature DB >> 33518775 |
Pius T Mpiana1, Koto-Te-Nyiwa Ngbolua2,3, Damien S T Tshibangu1, Jason T Kilembe1, Benjamin Z Gbolo2,3, Domaine T Mwanangombo1, Clement L Inkoto2, Emmanuel M Lengbiye2, Clement M Mbadiko2, Aristote Matondo1, Gedeon N Bongo2, Dorothée D Tshilanda1.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is the pathogen agent of the new corona virus disease that appeared at the end of 2019 in China. There is, currently, no effective treatment against COVID-19. We report in this study a molecular docking study of ten Aloe vera molecules with the main protease (3CLpro) responsible for the replication of coronaviruses. The outcome of their molecular simulation and ADMET properties reveal three potential inhibitors of the enzyme (ligands 6, 1 and 8) with a clear preference of ligand 6 that has the highest binding energy (-7.9 kcal/mol) and fully obeys the Lipinski's rule of five.Entities:
Keywords: ADMET properties; Aloe vera; Antiviral activity; COVID-19; Molecular docking; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2020 PMID: 33518775 PMCID: PMC7833182 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Phys Lett ISSN: 0009-2614 Impact factor: 2.328
Fig. 1Complex between COVID-19 Mpro and co-crystallized inhibitor 2GTB (PDB).
Fig. 2Structures of compounds 1–10 derived from Aloe vera.
Fig. 3Active site of 2GTB.
Binding affinity (kcal/mol) of 2GTB and Ligands.
| Receptor PDB ID | Ligands | Binding Affinity (ΔG en Kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| 2GTB | Lopinavir | −8.4 |
| Nelfinavir | −8.1 | |
| 6 | −7.9 | |
| 1 | −7.7 | |
| 8 | −7.7 | |
| −7.3 | ||
| 3 | −7.1 | |
| 5 | −7.1 | |
| 9 | −7.0 | |
| 10 | −6.8 | |
| 2 | −6.7 | |
| 4 | −6.7 |
Fig. 4(a) (left). H-bonding interactions between the best ligands with COVID-19 Mpro protein target; (b) (right) All types of interactions between the best ligands with COVID-19 Mpro.
Hydrogen-bonds parameters (distances and angles) derived from docking of COVID-19 Mpro with the three best ligands.
| Ligand | AA Group | Ligand Group | δ (Å) | θ(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CYS145 | O | 2.09 | 160 |
| HIS163 | H—O | 1.89 | 163 | |
| CYS145 | H—O | 1.77 | 160 | |
| 6 | HIS163 | H—O | 2.30 | 163 |
| LEU141 | H—O | 2.29 | 135 | |
| ASN142 | H—O | 1.86 | 153 | |
| CYS145 | O | 2.24 | 158 | |
| CYS145 | H—O | 1.77 | 160 | |
| 8 | GLU166 | H—O | 2.23 | 155 |
| CYS145 | O | 2.60 | 165 | |
| GLU166 | H—O | 2.28 | 140 | |
| HIS164 | H—O | 2.43 | 155 | |
Amino acids residues involved in H-bonds in both ligands and receptors.
| Inhibitor | Amino acids with H-bonds |
|---|---|
| 2GTB (PDB) | LYS5, ALA7, THR25, HIS41, MET49, TYR54, VAL125, TYR126, GLY127, PHE140, LEU141, ASN142, GLY143, SER144, CYS145, HIS163, HIS164, MET165, GLU166, LEU167, PRO168, HIS172, ASP187, ARG188, GLN189, GLN192, ALA198, LYS236, TYR237, GLN273 |
| Lopinavir | ARG188, GLU166, GLN189 |
| Nelfinavir | GLN189, GLU166, GLN192 |
| CYS145, HIS163, CYS145 | |
| GLU166, ARG188 | |
| GLU166, SER144, LEU141, HIS164, GLN168, CYS145, ASN142 | |
| GLU166, LEU141, CYS145, ASN142, HIS41, GLN189, HIS164, | |
| THR 26, HIS164, HIS163, LEU141, THR26 | |
| HIS163, CYS145, LEU141, ASN142, CYS145 | |
| GLU166, THR190, GLN189, ASN142, PHE140 | |
| CYS145, GLU166, HIS164, GLU166 | |
| GLN189, HIS141, GLY143, | |
| ASN142, HIS41 |
Lipinski parameters for dataset from SwissADME.
| Code | Compound name | Molecular weight (Da) | Log P | HBD | HBA | Violation | yes/no | Solubility | Log S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9-dihydroxyl-2-O-(z)-cinnamoyl-7-methoxy-Aloesin | 570.54 | 2.55 | 5 | 12 | 2 | no | Moderately soluble | −4.01 | |
| Aloe-emodin | 270.40 | 1.95 | 3 | 5 | 0 | yes | Soluble | −3.43 | |
| Aloin A | 418.89 | 2.20 | 7 | 9 | 1 | yes | Soluble | −2.95 | |
| Aloin B | 418.39 | 1.40 | 7 | 9 | 1 | yes | Soluble | −2.95 | |
| Elgonica dimer A | 686.61 | 2.79 | 10 | 134 | 3 | no | Poorly soluble | −6.57 | |
| Feralolide | 344.3 | 1.80 | 4 | 7 | 0 | yes | Moderately soluble | −5.48 | |
| IsoAloeresin | 556.56 | 2.70 | 5 | 11 | 2 | no | Moderately soluble | −5.06 | |
| Aloeresin | 538.56 | 3.25 | 3 | 10 | 1 | yes | Moderately soluble | −4.30 | |
| 7-O-methylAloeresin | 554.60 | 1.40 | 4 | 11 | 2 | no | Moderately soluble | −5.59 | |
| Chrysophanol | 268.26 | 2.50 | 2 | 4 | 0 | yes | Moderately soluble | −4.11 |
Pharmacokinetics and toxicity properties of the three potential inhibitors.
| Ligand | Ames_test | Carcino_Rat | BBB permeant | hERG | P-gp S. | Inhibition Constant (nM) | 1A2 | 2C19 | 2C9 | 2D6 | 3A4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutagen | Positive | No | Low risk | No | 3.19 | No | No | No | No | No | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | No | Ambiguous | Yes | 22.53 | No | No | No | No | No | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | No | High risk | Yes | 27.80 | No | No | No | No | Yes |