Literature DB >> 33517207

Use of multilevel modeling to examine variability of distracted driving behavior in naturalistic driving studies.

Sara A Freed1, Lesley A Ross2, Alyssa A Gamaldo3, Despina Stavrinos4.   

Abstract

Current methods of analyzing data from naturalistic driving studies provide important insights into real-world safety-related driving behaviors, but are limited in the depth of information they currently offer. Driving measures are frequently collapsed to summary levels across the study period, excluding more fine-grained differences such as changes that occur from trip to trip. By retaining trip-specific data, it is possible to quantify how much a driver differs from trip to trip (within-person variability) in addition to how he or she differs from other drivers (between-person variability). To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to use multilevel modeling to quantify variability in distracted driving behavior in a naturalistic dataset of older drivers. The current study demonstrates the utility of examining within-person variability in a naturalistic driving dataset of 68 older drivers across two weeks. First, multilevel models were conducted for three distracted driving behaviors to distinguish within-person variability from between-person variability in these behaviors. A high percentage of variation in distracted driving behaviors was attributable to within-person differences, indicating that drivers' behaviors varied more across their own driving trips than from other drivers (ICCs = .93). Then, to demonstrate the utility of personal characteristics in predicting daily driving behavior, a hypothetical model is presented using simulated daily sleep duration from the previous night to predict distracted driving behavior the following day. The current study demonstrates substantial variability in driving behaviors within an older adult sample and the promise of individual characteristics to provide better prediction of driving behaviors relevant to safety, which can be applied in investigations of current naturalistic driving datasets and in designing future studies.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driver distraction; Multilevel modeling; Naturalistic driving; Older drivers; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33517207      PMCID: PMC8204745          DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  27 in total

1.  Driver sleepiness and risk of serious injury to car occupants: population based case control study.

Authors:  Jennie Connor; Robyn Norton; Shanthi Ameratunga; Elizabeth Robinson; Ian Civil; Roger Dunn; John Bailey; Rod Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-11

2.  Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition.

Authors:  Martin J Sliwinski; Joshua M Smyth; Scott M Hofer; Robert S Stawski
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-09

3.  Distracted driving in elderly and middle-aged drivers.

Authors:  Kelsey R Thompson; Amy M Johnson; Jamie L Emerson; Jeffrey D Dawson; Erwin R Boer; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-10-24

4.  Variability in self-reported normal sleep across the adult age span.

Authors:  Haley R Dillon; Kenneth L Lichstein; Natalie D Dautovich; Daniel J Taylor; Brant W Riedel; Andrew J Bush
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Using naturalistic driving data to better understand the driving exposure and patterns of older drivers.

Authors:  Lisa J Molnar; David W Eby; Scott E Bogard; David J LeBlanc; Jennifer S Zakrajsek
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.491

6.  Cognitive functioning differentially predicts different dimensions of older drivers' on-road safety.

Authors:  Nazan Aksan; Steve W Anderson; Jeffrey Dawson; Ergun Uc; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2014-12-16

7.  A multidomain approach for predicting older driver safety under in-traffic road conditions.

Authors:  Joanne M Wood; Kaarin J Anstey; Graham K Kerr; Philippe F Lacherez; Stephen Lord
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Longitudinal Research on Aging Drivers (LongROAD): study design and methods.

Authors:  Guohua Li; David W Eby; Robert Santos; Thelma J Mielenz; Lisa J Molnar; David Strogatz; Marian E Betz; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Lindsay H Ryan; Vanya Jones; Samantha I Pitts; Linda L Hill; Charles J DiMaggio; David LeBlanc; Howard F Andrews
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Visual Sensory and Visual-Cognitive Function and Rate of Crash and Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data.

Authors:  Carrie Huisingh; Emily B Levitan; Marguerite R Irvin; Paul MacLennan; Virginia Wadley; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Sleep deficiency and motor vehicle crash risk in the general population: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel J Gottlieb; Jeffrey M Ellenbogen; Matt T Bianchi; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  3 in total

1.  Neuropsychological Correlates of Changes in Driving Behavior Among Clinically Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; Samantha A Murphy; Jason M Doherty; Ann M Johnson; Sayeh Bayat; Alexis Walker; Yasmin Peña; Jason Hassenstab; John C Morris; Ganesh M Babulal
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Yellow light decision based on driving style: Day or night?

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Yan Mao; Jing Jing Xiong; Wu He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Re-Thinking the Mediating Role of Emotional Valence and Arousal between Personal Factors and Occupational Safety Attention Levels.

Authors:  Jiaming Wang; Pin-Chao Liao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.