Literature DB >> 33516947

Prognosis of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction after transvenous lead extraction and the need for additional hemodynamic support in the perioperative period.

Nobuhiro Nishii1, Takashi Nishimoto2, Tomofumi Mizuno2, Takuro Masuda2, Saori Asada2, Masakazu Miyamoto2, Satoshi Kawada2, Koji Nakagawa2, Kazufumi Nakamura2, Hiroshi Morita3, Hiroshi Morimatsu4, Shingo Kasahara5, Hiroshi Ito2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is necessary because of system infection, lead malfunction, or system upgrade. Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (SLVD) undergoing TLE may be at a higher risk because hemodynamic parameters may change unfavorably during or after TLE; however, this has not yet been clarified.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether patients with SLVD undergoing TLE have higher mortality.
METHODS: All patients who underwent TLE were stratified as follows: patients with ejection fraction ≤ 35% (SLVD group) and those with ejection fraction > 35% (non-SLVD group).
RESULTS: We assessed the data of 200 patients [SLVD group, 36 (18%); non-SLVD group, 164 (82%)]). Brain natriuretic peptide level and cardiac resynchronization therapy rate were higher in the SLVD group than in the non-SLVD group. There were no significant between-group differences in major complications and clinical success rates. Patients with SLVD were more likely to require additional hemodynamic support, such as catecholamine infusion, temporary atrium-ventricle sequential pacing, and temporary cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing (27.8% vs 1.2%; P < .001). The survival rate was not significantly different between the groups at 30 days and 1 year after TLE (SLVD vs non-SLVD: 30 days: 97.2% vs 99.4%; P = .215; 1 year: 80.6% vs 91.5%; P = .053). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed log brain natriuretic peptide and serum hemoglobin levels as predictors for 1-year mortality.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis after TLE was comparable between patients with and without SLVD. However, additional hemodynamic support was often necessary for patients with SLVD.
Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additional hemodynamic support; Lead extraction; Severe left ventricular dysfunction; Temporary atrium-ventricle sequential pacing; Temporary cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33516947     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  2 in total

1.  Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?

Authors:  Paweł Stefańczyk; Dorota Nowosielecka; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Wojciech Jacheć; Ewa Lewicka; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Assessing long-term survival and hospitalization following transvenous lead extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Vishal S Mehta; Hugh O'Brien; Mark K Elliott; Baldeep S Sidhu; Justin Gould; Anoop K Shetty; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-10-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.