Literature DB >> 33516239

The impact of age and receipt antihypertensives to systolic blood pressure and shock index at injury scene and in the emergency department to predict massive transfusion in trauma patients.

Se Jin Park1, Mi Jin Lee2, Changho Kim1, Haewon Jung1, Seong Hun Kim3, Wooyoung Nho3, Kang Suk Seo1, Jungbae Park1, Hyun Wook Ryoo1, Jae Yun Ahn1, Sungbae Moon1, Jae Wan Cho1, Shin-Ah Son4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and shock index (SI) are accurate indicators of hemodynamic instability and the need for transfusion in trauma patients. We aimed to determine whether the utility and cutoff point for SBP and SI are affected by age and antihypertensives.
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of a level 1 trauma center between January 2017 and December 2018. We analyzed the utility and cutoff points of SBP and SI for predicting massive transfusion (MT) and 30-day mortality according to patients' age and whether they were taking antihypertensives. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association of age and antihypertensives on primary and secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: We analyzed 4681 trauma cases. There were 1949 patients aged 65 years or older (41.6%), and 1375 hypertensive patients (29.4%). MT was given to 137 patients (2.9%). The 30-day mortality rate was 6.3% (n = 294). In geriatric trauma patients taking antihypertensives, a prehospital SBP less than 110 mmHg was the cutoff value for predicting MT in multivariate logistic regression analyses; packed red blood cell transfusion volume decreased abruptly based on prehospital SBP of 110 mmHg. Emergency Department SI greater than 1.0 was the cutoff value for predicting MT in patients who were older than 65 years and were not taking antihypertensives.
CONCLUSIONS: The triage of trauma patients is based on the identification of clinical features readily identifiable by first responders. However, age and medications may also affect the accurate evaluation. In initial trauma management, we must apply SBP and SI differently depending on age, whether a patient is taking antihypertensives, and the time at which the indicators are measured.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antihypertensives; Emergency medical services; Geriatrics; Massive transfusion; Shock index; Systolic blood pressure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33516239      PMCID: PMC7847168          DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00840-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med        ISSN: 1757-7241            Impact factor:   2.953


  30 in total

1.  Early predictors for massive transfusion in older adult severe trauma patients.

Authors:  Takao Ohmori; Taisuke Kitamura; Junko Ishihara; Hirokazu Onishi; Tsuyoshi Nojima; Kotaro Yamamoto; Ryu Tamura; Kentaro Muranishi; Toshiyuki Matsumoto; Takamitsu Tokioka
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.

Authors:  Scott M Sasser; Richard C Hunt; Mark Faul; David Sugerman; William S Pearson; Theresa Dulski; Marlena M Wald; Gregory J Jurkovich; Craig D Newgard; E Brooke Lerner
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2012-01-13

3.  'Normal' vital signs belie occult hypoperfusion in geriatric trauma patients.

Authors:  Jeremiah T Martin; Fuad Alkhoury; Judith A O'Connor; Tassos C Kyriakides; John A Bonadies
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Prognostic value of cardiac troponin I assay in hospitalized elderly patients.

Authors:  Francesca Attanasio; Pamela Carrer; Anna Zurlo; Anna Rossi; Luciano Babuin; Monica Maria Mion; Martina Zaninotto; Mario Plebani; Sabino Iliceto; Enzo Manzato; Valter Giantin
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  The value of the difference between ED and prehospital vital signs in predicting outcome in trauma.

Authors:  Stevan R Bruijns; Henry R Guly; Omar Bouamra; Fiona Lecky; Lee A Wallis
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Predicting hospital discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients: is frailty the answer?

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; Viraj Pandit; Peter Rhee; Hassan Aziz; Moutamn Sadoun; Julie Wynne; Andrew Tang; Narong Kulvatunyou; Terence O'Keeffe; Mindy J Fain; Randall S Friese
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  M Y Rady; P Nightingale; R A Little; J D Edwards
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1992 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Spencer C H Kuo; Kuo Pao-Jen; Hsu Shiun-Yuan; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh; Hang-Tsung Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Shock index increase from the field to the emergency room is associated with higher odds of massive transfusion in trauma patients with stable blood pressure: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Chun Wu; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Spencer C H Kuo; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients: In conjunction with the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  C Eric McCoy; Bharath Chakravarthy; Shahram Lotfipour
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Premorbid Clinical Frailty Score and 30-day mortality among older adults in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ji Young Huh; Yoshinori Matsuoka; Hiroki Kinoshita; Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue; Yosuke Yamamoto; Koichi Ariyoshi
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.