Maia Phillips Smith1. 1. St. George's University School of Medicine, PO Box 7, True Blue, West Indies, Grenada. Maia.phillips.smith@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-perceptions of health and disease can be a major driver of health behaviors. Improving accuracy of self-ascertainment of obesity may prompt uptake of weight-control behaviors in those with obesity. METHODS: We assess performance of self-perceived body size ('too small', 'about right' or 'too large'), self-estimated BMI in kg/m2, and sociodemographics in detecting measured BMI category (under-, normal-, overweight and obese; BMI cutpoints 18.5, 25 and 30) in first bivariate and then multivariable models. RESULTS: Of 37,281 adults in the US from NHANES, 2, 34, 33 and 32% were under-, normal-, overweight and obese. Respectively 56, 73, 60 and 91% self-perceived as 'too small', 'about right', 'too large' and 'too large.' Of those who self-perceived as 'too small', 22% were underweight and 10% were overweight or obese. 99.7% of obese participants self-estimated a BMI in the overweight/obese range, including many who did not self-perceive as 'too large'. Among obese participants, self-perception as either 'about right' or 'too small' was more likely for those who were younger (OR for perception as 'too large' 1.01 per year, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.01) male (OR 0.33, (0.28-0.39)) nonwhite (ORs 0.36-0.79 for different ethnicities), low-income (ORs 0.61 and 1.8 for the lowest and highest of six categories, vs. the third) or measured recently (OR 0.98 (0.96-1.0) per year since 1999). Misperception was less common, but still existed, for participants with moderate or severe obesity (ORs 2.9 (2.3-3.5) and 7.9 (5.4-12), vs. 'mild.') (all p < 0.01.) CONCLUSIONS: A tenth of adults in the US with obesity, especially those from overweight peer groups, self-perceive as normal or underweight and thus may not be motivated to control their weight. However, virtually all self-estimate an overweight or obese BMI. If measured BMI is not available, self-estimates are sufficiently accurate that interventions may rely on it to identify obesity.
BACKGROUND: Self-perceptions of health and disease can be a major driver of health behaviors. Improving accuracy of self-ascertainment of obesity may prompt uptake of weight-control behaviors in those with obesity. METHODS: We assess performance of self-perceived body size ('too small', 'about right' or 'too large'), self-estimated BMI in kg/m2, and sociodemographics in detecting measured BMI category (under-, normal-, overweight and obese; BMI cutpoints 18.5, 25 and 30) in first bivariate and then multivariable models. RESULTS: Of 37,281 adults in the US from NHANES, 2, 34, 33 and 32% were under-, normal-, overweight and obese. Respectively 56, 73, 60 and 91% self-perceived as 'too small', 'about right', 'too large' and 'too large.' Of those who self-perceived as 'too small', 22% were underweight and 10% were overweight or obese. 99.7% of obeseparticipants self-estimated a BMI in the overweight/obese range, including many who did not self-perceive as 'too large'. Among obeseparticipants, self-perception as either 'about right' or 'too small' was more likely for those who were younger (OR for perception as 'too large' 1.01 per year, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.01) male (OR 0.33, (0.28-0.39)) nonwhite (ORs 0.36-0.79 for different ethnicities), low-income (ORs 0.61 and 1.8 for the lowest and highest of six categories, vs. the third) or measured recently (OR 0.98 (0.96-1.0) per year since 1999). Misperception was less common, but still existed, for participants with moderate or severe obesity (ORs 2.9 (2.3-3.5) and 7.9 (5.4-12), vs. 'mild.') (all p < 0.01.) CONCLUSIONS: A tenth of adults in the US with obesity, especially those from overweight peer groups, self-perceive as normal or underweight and thus may not be motivated to control their weight. However, virtually all self-estimate an overweight or obese BMI. If measured BMI is not available, self-estimates are sufficiently accurate that interventions may rely on it to identify obesity.
Authors: Siddharth Singh; Virend K Somers; Matthew M Clark; Kristin Vickers; Donald D Hensrud; Yoel Korenfeld; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Kevin R Brooks; Jonathan Mond; Deborah Mitchison; Richard J Stevenson; Kirsten L Challinor; Ian D Stephen Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Date: 2019-11-14
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Kathleen Y Wolin; Melissa Scharoun-Lee; Eric L Ding; Erica T Warner; Gary G Bennett Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Bianca Bullivant; Aaron R Denham; Clare Stephens; Rebecca E Olson; Deborah Mitchison; Timothy Gill; Sarah Maguire; Janet D Latner; Phillipa Hay; Bryan Rodgers; Richard J Stevenson; Stephen Touyz; Jonathan M Mond Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.295