Freja Andresen Fabricius1, Sofie Theresa Thomsen1, Sisse Fagt2, Maarten Nauta3. 1. Division of Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. 2. Division of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. 3. Division of Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. maana@food.dtu.dk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diets consisting of high amounts of animal-based protein have been associated with adverse public health effects and are often deemed environmentally unsustainable. Therefore, replacing red meat by pulses has been proposed to reduce the adverse impact on human health and environment. However, unprocessed red meat is an important source of nutrients, such as vitamin B12, iron, zinc and selenium, and the substitution may have negative impact on nutrient adequacy. METHOD: Using a risk-benefit assessment (RBA) approach, we, therefore, estimated the health impact of substituting unprocessed red meat by pulses on the burden of non-communicable diseases in Denmark, using Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY). Furthermore, we assessed the impact of the substitution on nutrient adequacy. RESULTS: We found that 187 (95% UI: 209; 168) healthy years of life could be gained per 100,000 individuals per year by substituting 100% of unprocessed red meat by pulses in the Danish diet. We found a decrease in the intake of vitamin B12, zinc and selenium due to the substitution. An additional 10% of the Danish population will become at risk of vitamin B12 and selenium inadequacy, and an additional 20% will be at risk of zinc inadequacy due to the substitution. For iron, a small decrease in the proportion at risk of inadequacy was found. CONCLUSION: Substitution of unprocessed red meat by pulses was estimated to provide a beneficial health impact on the burden of non-communicable disease, expressed in DALY. Additionally, it was found that the complete substitution will lead to a higher risk of nutrient inadequacies.
BACKGROUND: Diets consisting of high amounts of animal-based protein have been associated with adverse public health effects and are often deemed environmentally unsustainable. Therefore, replacing red meat by pulses has been proposed to reduce the adverse impact on human health and environment. However, unprocessed red meat is an important source of nutrients, such as vitamin B12, iron, zinc and selenium, and the substitution may have negative impact on nutrient adequacy. METHOD: Using a risk-benefit assessment (RBA) approach, we, therefore, estimated the health impact of substituting unprocessed red meat by pulses on the burden of non-communicable diseases in Denmark, using Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY). Furthermore, we assessed the impact of the substitution on nutrient adequacy. RESULTS: We found that 187 (95% UI: 209; 168) healthy years of life could be gained per 100,000 individuals per year by substituting 100% of unprocessed red meat by pulses in the Danish diet. We found a decrease in the intake of vitamin B12, zinc and selenium due to the substitution. An additional 10% of the Danish population will become at risk of vitamin B12 and selenium inadequacy, and an additional 20% will be at risk of zinc inadequacy due to the substitution. For iron, a small decrease in the proportion at risk of inadequacy was found. CONCLUSION: Substitution of unprocessed red meat by pulses was estimated to provide a beneficial health impact on the burden of non-communicable disease, expressed in DALY. Additionally, it was found that the complete substitution will lead to a higher risk of nutrient inadequacies.
Authors: Jeljer Hoekstra; Andy Hart; Alan Boobis; Erika Claupein; Andrew Cockburn; Alistair Hunt; Ib Knudsen; David Richardson; Benoît Schilter; Katrin Schütte; Paul R Torgerson; Hans Verhagen; Bernhard Watzl; Alessandro Chiodini Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: An Pan; Qi Sun; Adam M Bernstein; Matthias B Schulze; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: H Verhagen; M J Tijhuis; H Gunnlaugsdóttir; N Kalogeras; O Leino; J M Luteijn; S H Magnússon; G Odekerken; M V Pohjola; J T Tuomisto; Ø Ueland; B C White; F Holm Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Marco Springmann; Michael Clark; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Keith Wiebe; Benjamin Leon Bodirsky; Luis Lassaletta; Wim de Vries; Sonja J Vermeulen; Mario Herrero; Kimberly M Carlson; Malin Jonell; Max Troell; Fabrice DeClerck; Line J Gordon; Rami Zurayk; Peter Scarborough; Mike Rayner; Brent Loken; Jess Fanzo; H Charles J Godfray; David Tilman; Johan Rockström; Walter Willett Journal: Nature Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M J Tijhuis; N de Jong; M V Pohjola; H Gunnlaugsdóttir; M Hendriksen; J Hoekstra; F Holm; N Kalogeras; O Leino; F X R van Leeuwen; J M Luteijn; S H Magnússon; G Odekerken; C Rompelberg; J T Tuomisto; Ø Ueland; B C White; H Verhagen Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Elisabeth H M Temme; Hilko van der Voet; Jac T N M Thissen; Janneke Verkaik-Kloosterman; Gerda van Donkersgoed; Sanderine Nonhebel Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Elisabeth H M Temme; Helena M E Bakker; S Marije Seves; Janneke Verkaik-Kloosterman; Arnold L Dekkers; Joop M A van Raaij; Marga C Ocké Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.022