Literature DB >> 33514363

A novel 3D-printed locking cage for anterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion: case report and in vitro biomechanical evaluation.

Shenglin Wang1, Huijie Leng1, Yinglun Tian1, Nanfang Xu1, Zhongjun Liu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation is aimed at reduction and stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint. 3D printing refers to a process where additive manufacturing is achieved under precise computer control. Literature on its utilization in anterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion is rare. This study is the first report on a 3D-printed locking cage used in the anterior procedure for atlantoaxial dislocation.
METHODS: A middle-aged male in his 40s presented with weakness and numbness of his extremities for 3 years and could only walk slowly with assistance. Imaging studies revealed severe anterior migration of C1, irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation, and severe cervical-medullary compression. A preoperative plan consisting of trans-oral soft tissue release and fixation using tailor-designed 3D-printed cages was devised. Following fluoroscopic confirmation of reduction of the atlantoaxial joints, two customized 3D-printed cages made of titanium alloy were inserted into the bilateral facet joints, which were then locked by six screws into the lateral masses of C1 and C2. The microstructure of the inserted cages was optimized for improved biomechanical stability and enhanced osseo-integration, without the need for bone grafting. In addition, a biomechanical test was performed on seven human cadaveric specimens comparing the novel implant with the conventional C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw construct in three modes of motion (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation).
RESULTS: Improvement of neurologic function in the patient was evident immediately after surgery. He was able to walk independently 1 month post-operatively. At the 12-month follow-up, coronal reconstruction of CT demonstrated properly-positioned 3D-printed cages, evidence of osseo-integration at the bone-implant interface, and no subsidence or displacement of the implant. Eighteen months out of surgery, the mJOA score improved to 15, and lateral X-ray confirmed reduction of atlanto-axial dislocation. Additionally, the new construct provided strong fixation comparable to that conferred by conventional constructs as there was no significant difference observed between the two groups in all three directions of motion.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel implant represents a new option in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. It can provide strong anterior support for solid fixation and fusion with a low profile and a microstructure that obviates the need for bone grafting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printed implant; Irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation; Patient-specific implants; Range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33514363      PMCID: PMC7844893          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03987-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  16 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison of Modified TARP Technique Versus Modified Goel Technique for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  BaoCheng Zhang; HaiBo Liu; XianHua Cai; ZhiHua Wang; Feng Xu; XiMing Liu; HuaSong Wang; Hui Kang; Ran Ding
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate fixation for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Authors:  Qing-shui Yin; Fu-zhi Ai; Kai Zhang; Yun-bing Chang; Hong Xia; Zeng-hui Wu; Ri Quan; Xiao-hong Mai; Jing-fa Liu
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2006-02

Review 3.  Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jerry Y Du; Alexander Aichmair; Janina Kueper; Timothy Wright; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-12-05

4.  Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alessandro Sgro; Monish M Maharaj; Paul D'Urso; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 5.  3D Printing in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Hong Cai; Zhongjun Liu; Feng Wei; Miao Yu; Nanfang Xu; Zihe Li
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  In vivo study of a self-stabilizing artificial vertebral body fabricated by electron beam melting.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Hong Cai; Jia Lv; Ke Zhang; Huijie Leng; Chuiguo Sun; Zhiguo Wang; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgical strategies for the treatment of os odontoideum with atlantoaxial dislocation.

Authors:  Xinghuo Wu; Kirkham B Wood; Yong Gao; Shuai Li; Jing Wang; Ting Ge; Boming Zhao; Zengwu Shao; Shuhua Yang; Cao Yang
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-11-17

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of C1 lateral mass and C2 translaminar bicortical screws in atlantoaxial fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric study.

Authors:  Shichang Liu; Zongrang Song; Limin Liu; Xinhua Yin; Xiongke Hu; Ming Yang; Qining Wu; Yueming Song; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Biomechanical Comparison of Four Different Atlantoaxial Posterior Fixation Constructs in Adults: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Chun; Do Heum Yoon; Keung Nyun Kim; Seong Yi; Dong Ah Shin; Yoon Ha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Branko Kopjar; Aria Nouri; Paul Arnold; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Ronald Bartels; Zhou Qiang; Anoushka Singh; Mehmet Zileli; Alexander Vaccaro; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  3D printing applications in spine surgery: an evidence-based assessment toward personalized patient care.

Authors:  Ahmed Habib; Nicolina Jovanovich; Nallammai Muthiah; Ali Alattar; Nima Alan; Nitin Agarwal; Alp Ozpinar; David Kojo Hamilton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Effects of Different Parameter Settings for 3D Data Smoothing and Mesh Simplification on Near Real-Time 3D Reconstruction of High Resolution Bioceramic Bone Void Filling Medical Images.

Authors:  Daniel Jie Yuan Chin; Ahmad Sufril Azlan Mohamed; Khairul Anuar Shariff; Mohd Nadhir Ab Wahab; Kunio Ishikawa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.