Literature DB >> 33514266

Registered Report: Testing Ideological Asymmetries in Measurement Invariance.

Mark J Brandt1,2, Jia He2, Michael Bender2.   

Abstract

People with different ideological identities differ in their values, personality, affect, and psychological motivations. These differences are observed on measures of practical and clinical importance and these differences are the central node tying together theories about the psychology of political ideology; however, they rest on a critical untested assumption: The measures are invariant across ideological groups. Here, we test this assumption across 28 constructs in data from the United States and the Netherlands. Measures are not invariant across ideological divisions. At the same time, estimates of ideological similarities and differences are largely similar before and after correcting for measurement noninvariance. This may give us increased confidence in the results from this research area, while simultaneously highlighting that some instance of noninvariance did change conclusions and that individual items are not always comparable across political groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ideological asymmetry; ideology; invariance; measurement; personality; political psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33514266      PMCID: PMC7961747          DOI: 10.1177/1073191120983891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  38 in total

Review 1.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.

Authors:  John T Jost; Christopher M Federico; Jaime L Napier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null.

Authors:  Christopher J Ferguson; Moritz Heene
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

4.  The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study.

Authors:  Keith E Stanovich; Maggie E Toplak
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-03-13

5.  Extremists on the Left and Right Use Angry, Negative Language.

Authors:  Jeremy A Frimer; Mark J Brandt; Zachary Melton; Matt Motyl
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-12-11

6.  Equivalence of cross-cultural data: an overview of basic issues.

Authors:  Y H Poortinga
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  1989

7.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

8.  Measurement Invariance of the Five Factor Model of Personality: Facet-Level Analyses Among Euro and Asian Americans.

Authors:  P Priscilla Lui; Douglas B Samuel; David Rollock; Frederick T L Leong; Edward C Chang
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-09-19

9.  MplusAutomation: An R Package for Facilitating Large-Scale Latent Variable Analyses in Mplus.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Joshua F Wiley
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 6.125

10.  The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey: exact vs. approximate measurement invariance.

Authors:  Florian Zercher; Peter Schmidt; Jan Cieciuch; Eldad Davidov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do Cross-Group Differences in Life Satisfaction Reflect Measurement Bias or True Differences in Life Satisfaction? Evidence from a Dutch National Sample.

Authors:  Mohsen Joshanloo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.