Literature DB >> 33514177

Effects of syllable stress in adaptation to altered auditory feedback in vowels.

Sarah Bakst1, Caroline A Niziolek1.   

Abstract

Unstressed syllables in English most commonly contain the vowel quality [ə] (schwa), which is cross-linguistically described as having a variable target. The present study examines whether speakers are sensitive to whether their auditory feedback matches their target when producing unstressed syllables. When speakers hear themselves producing formant-altered speech, they will change their motor plans so that their altered feedback is a better match to the target. If schwa has no target, then feedback mismatches in unstressed syllables may not drive a change in production. In this experiment, participants spoke disyllabic words with initial or final stress where the auditory feedback of F1 was raised (Experiment 1) or lowered (Experiment 2) by 100 mels. Both stressed and unstressed syllables showed adaptive changes in F1. In Experiment 1, initial-stress words showed larger adaptive decreases in F1 than final-stress words, but in Experiment 2, stressed syllables overall showed greater adaptive increases in F1 than unstressed syllables in all words, regardless of which syllable contained the primary stress. These results suggest that speakers are sensitive to feedback mismatches in both stressed and unstressed syllables, but that stress and metrical foot type may mediate the corrective response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33514177      PMCID: PMC7846293          DOI: 10.1121/10.0003052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.

Authors:  U Natke; K T Kalveram
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N Macdonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Partial compensation for altered auditory feedback: a tradeoff with somatosensory feedback?

Authors:  Shira Katseff; John Houde; Keith Johnson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Robust Sensorimotor Learning during Variable Sentence-Level Speech.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Harriet J Smith; Kate E Watkins; Douglas M Shiller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Kevin J Reilly; Erin Archibald; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1981-03

9.  Prosodic adaptations to pitch perturbation in running speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Caroline Niziolek; Kevin Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.