Literature DB >> 33513186

Peguero-Lo Presti criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zongying Yu1, Jie Song1, Li Cheng1, Shasha Li2, Qun Lu1, Yafeng Zhang3, Xiaoci Lin4, Dadong Liu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Peguero-Lo Presti criteria are novel electrocardiographic (ECG) diagnostic criteria for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and represent the sum of the amplitude of the deepest S wave in any lead with the S wave in lead V4 (SD+SV4). The diagnostic efficacy of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria in LVH is still debatable. We aimed to test the sensitivity and specificity of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria and compared them with those of the Cornell voltage index to assess their overall performance in LVH diagnosis.
METHODS: Electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Knowledge, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception until May 18, 2020. Trials written in English that investigated the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria for detecting LVH were included. Data were independently extracted and analyzed by two investigators.
RESULTS: A total of 51 records were screened, and 6 trials comprising 13,564 patients were finally included. A bivariate analysis showed that the sensitivity of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria (0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.58) was higher than that of the Cornell voltage index (0.29, 95% CI 0.23-0.36) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (0.24, 95% CI 0.21-0.27); the diagnostic accuracy of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria (0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) was also higher than that of the Cornell voltage index (0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.71) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (0.28, 95% CI 0.25-0.32); and the specificity of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria (0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.90) was similar to that of the Cornell voltage index (0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.95) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (0.94, 95%CI 0.88-0.97). Two trials (including 12,748 patients) were discharged because they included partly healthy subjects and accounted for substantial heterogeneity. Pooled analysis of the remaining 4 trials (including 816 patients) showed that the sensitivity of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria (0.56, 95% CI 0.51-0.61) was also higher than that of the Cornell voltage index (0.36, 95% CI 0.31-0.42) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (0.24, 95% CI 0.18-0.31); the diagnostic accuracy of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria (0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.87) was also higher than that of the Cornell voltage index (0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.58) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (0.38, 95% CI 0.34-0.42); and the specificity of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria (0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.92) was similar to that of the Cornell voltage index (0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.96) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (0.97, 95% CI 0.90-0.99). Both the likelihood ratio and posttest probability of the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria and Cornell voltage index were moderate.
CONCLUSION: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Peguero-Lo Presti criteria-based ECG diagnostic method for LVH has high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy and should be applied in clinical practice settings.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33513186      PMCID: PMC7846009          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular hypertrophy: The relationship between the electrocardiogram and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ljuba Bacharova; Martin Ugander
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Revision of the Sokolow-Lyon-Rappaport and cornell voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Sérgio Lamêgo Rodrigues; Lílian D'Angelo; Alexandre Costa Pereira; José Eduardo Krieger; José Geraldo Mill
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Newly proposed electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Qingmiao Shao; Lei Meng; Gary Tse; Abhishek C Sawant; Calista Zhuo Yi Chan; George Bazoukis; Adrian Baranchuk; Guangping Li; Tong Liu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Assessment of Novel Peguero-Lo Presti Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Criteria in a Large Asian Population: Newer May Not Be Better.

Authors:  Guo-Zhe Sun; Hao-Yu Wang; Ning Ye; Ying-Xian Sun
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Electrocardiographic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Thomas J Betjeman; Luis Rigales; Irwin Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Influence of relative wall thickness on electrocardiographic voltage measures in left ventricular hypertrophy: a novel factor contributing to poor diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Ning Ye; Guo-Zhe Sun; Ying Zhou; Shao-Jun Wu; Ying-Xian Sun
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Mohammad Shenasa; Hossein Shenasa
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: development and prospective validation of improved criteria.

Authors:  P N Casale; R B Devereux; P Kligfield; R R Eisenberg; D H Miller; B S Chaudhary; M C Phillips
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Optimized electrocardiographic criteria for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in obesity patients.

Authors:  Sanne M Snelder; Sweder W E van de Poll; Lotte E de Groot-de Laat; Isabella Kardys; Felix Zijlstra; Bas M van Dalen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Golden Standard or Obsolete Method? Review of ECG Applications in Clinical and Experimental Context.

Authors:  Tibor Stracina; Marina Ronzhina; Richard Redina; Marie Novakova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Evaluation of Different Criteria in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Electrocardiogram in Comparison With Echocardiogram.

Authors:  João Pedro Marcato; Felipe Senra Santos; André Gama Palone; Gustavo Lenci Marques
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.