| Literature DB >> 33511313 |
Zheng Wei1,2,3, Huihui Zou1,3, Gongyuan Liu4, Chuanhui Song1,3, Chuanchao Tang1,3, Sheng Chen5, Guorong Zhang6, Jianchuan Ran1,3, Yufeng Wang1,3, Xiteng Yin1,3, Yu Cai7,3, Wei Han1,3.
Abstract
Here, evodiamine (EVO) and the photosensitizer indocyanine green (ICG) were integrated into a liposomal nanoplatform for noninvasive diagnostic imaging and combinatorial therapy against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). EVO, as an active component extracted from traditional Chinese medicine, not only functioned as an antitumor chemotherapeutic agent but was also capable of 68Ga-chelation, thus working as a contrast agent for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. Moreover, EVO could exhibit peroxidase-like catalytic activity, converting endogenous tumor H2O2 into cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), enabling Chemo catalytic therapy beyond the well-known chemotherapy effect of EVO. As proven by in vitro and in vivo experiments, guided by optical imaging and PET/CT imaging, we show that the theragnostic liposomes have a significant inhibiting effect on in situ tongue tumor through photodynamic therapy combined with chemodynamic chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; CAT, Catalase Activity; CDT, Chemodynamic therapy; DI water, deionized water; DLS, dynamic light scattering; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; EPR, enhanced permeability and retention; EVO, evodiamine; Evodiamine; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; FI, fluorescence imaging; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; ICG, indocyanine green; NIR, Near-infrared; OSCC, Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; PBS, polarization beam splitter; PDT, Photodynamic therapy; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Peroxidase-mimicking; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SD, Sprague-Dawley; SOSG, singlet oxygen sensor green; TEM, transmission electron microscope; THF, tetrahydrofuran; TMB, tetramethylbenzidine; Trimodal antitumor therapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33511313 PMCID: PMC7810628 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1The characteristics of EI@Lipo and the basic components. A. The UV absorption of EVO, EVO@Lipo, ICG@Lipo, and EI@Lipo in blue, red, green, and orange lines, respectively. B. The fluorescence of ICG@Lipo (green) and EI@Lipo (orange). C. EI@Lipo was stored in various solutions for two weeks, namely water, PBS, DMEM, F12, and FBS. D. DLS detection of nano Liposomes, ICG@Lipo, EVO@Lipo, and EI@Lipo. E and F. The average diameter of various nanoliposomes ranged from 110 nm to 120 nm. The TEM result of Liposomes and EI@Lipo. In addition, the average diameters of Liposomes and EI@Lipo were approximately 110 nm and 120 nm, respectively, which was consistent with the DLS result. In addition, the size of EI@Lipo was a little bit larger than free Liposomes. Scale bar = 0.5 μm (big). Scale bar = 100 nm (small). G. EVO could decompose H2O2, and this capability was EVO-concentration dependently. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. H. TMB could be oxidized in the presence of EVO and H2O2, and the product's UV-VIS absorption peak occurred at 370 nm and 625 nm. In addition, the result showed that EVO had horseradish peroxidase-like properties. I. Singlet oxygen production could be significantly enhanced in the EI@Lipo + H2O2 group.
Fig. 2Intracellular uptake of EVO and EI@Lipo. A. CAL 27 cells were cultured with PBS, EVO, and EI@Lipo overnight. A flow cytometer was used to detect the cellular fluorescence of EVO at 405 nm. The concentration of EVO was 10 μg/mL. Liposomes could notably enhance the cellular uptake of EVO. B. Subcellular co-localization between EI@Lipo with Lysosomes, Endoplasmic reticulum and Mitochondria. Scale bar = 100 μm. C. Colocalization images of EI@Lipo and LysoTracker, ERtracker and Mitotracker, showed substantial overlap between those channels. Inset: 0.92, 0.89 and 0.53 overlap via Pearson correlation analysis.
Fig. 3Cellular ROS level was signaled by the DCFH-DA probe in green (scale bar = 100 μm). The concentration of EVO and ICG was equaled to 8.07 μg/mL. B. The cell proliferation assays were evaluated by CCK-8. CAL 27 cells were treated with various formulations for 24 h. Data was mean ± SD (n = 4). C. The clone formation of CAL 27 cells was measured by crystal violet. CAL 2 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and cocultured with various agents for 24h. D. Inhibition migration of CAL 27 cells was examined by wound healing assay after 6 h and 24 h. The experiments were repeated three times. Quantitative analysis was conducted by GraphPad. **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.0001.
The IC50 values of each group.
| The concentrations of EVO or ICG (μg/mL). | ||
|---|---|---|
| CAL 27 | Fadu | |
| EVO | 15.51 ± 1.65 | 28.85 ± 0.98 |
| EVO@Lipo | 9.89 ± 0.20 | 13.90 ± 0.55 |
| EI@Lipo | 9.14 ± 0.87 | 13.90 ± 0.81 |
| ICG@Lipo + Laser | 8.01 ± 0.17 | 9.56 ± 0.23 |
| EI@Lipo + Laser | 5.29 ± 0.66 | 7.10 ± 0.36 |
Fig. 4The fluorescence of Live/Dead cells. Live cells and dead cells were signaled in were signaled in green and red fluorescence, respectively; EVO was shown in blue. Scale bar = 100 μm. B. The apoptosis detection of CAL 27 cells analyzed by flow cytometry. Q2: Live cells: Annexin-V−/PI−; Apoptotic cells: Annexin-V+/PI−; Dead cells: Annexin-V+/PI+. C. Apoptotic pathway markers of caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 were analyzed by Western blot, and the quantitative analysis was shown in D and E. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 5Penetration and photodynamic therapy in solid tumor spheroid model Tumor spheroid formation on the 10th day. The diameters were approximately 80 μm. A–C. The penetration result of EVO and EI@Lipo after coculturing for 24 h. B. EVO only surrounded the edge of the tumor sphere and could not penetrate into the deep. C. EI@Lipo penetrated the spheroid and delivered the EVO into cells, which was shown in blue fluorescence. D. The CAL 27 sphere was treated with EI@Lipo plus 808 nm laser irradiation at the power of 0.5 W for 15min. The CAL 27 sphere was defeated into pieces after 15 min irradiation. The pictures were screenshots from the therapy process Video 2, Video 3.
Fig. 6Bimodal live imaging of EI@Lipo on the tumor-bearing murine model of tongue cancer in situ. A. 808 nm excitation fluorescence images of control, ICG, and EI@Lipo. Pictures were obtained every 2 h after the tail injection. B. The reaction between EVO and 68Ga. C. The PET-CT images of control+68Ga, EVO+68Ga, EVO@Lipo+68Ga, and EI@Lipo+68Ga. In addition, pictures were obtained after 0.5 h of tail injection. The tongue tumor was signaled in a green circle.
Fig. 7Tri-modal therapy against Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma After the tumor volume reached 20 mm3, the therapies were performed every three days with the equivalent EVO dose of 2.0 mg/kg or an ICG dose of 2.0 mg/kg. A. The body weight was monitored before the injections. The body weight loss with the tongue tumor growth in the PBS and ICG@Lipo groups. However, mice treated with EI@Lipo +808 nm showed the weight rise again. B. Tumor growth profiles of CAL 27 tongue tumor xenograft-bearing nude mice via different treatments. * <0.5, ** <0.01, *** <0.001. C. Representative CAL 27 tongue tumors picture at the end of treatments. D. The immunohistochemical studies (H&E and Ki-67) of tongue cancer slices. The brown staining of the nucleus indicated the positive expression of Ki-67, and the higher the positive rate, the stronger proliferation of tumor cells.
Fig. 8Biosafety assessment of different agents. The liver and kidney function detection of SD rats fed with PBS, EVO, EVO@Lipo, ICG@Lipo, and EI@Lipo. The dose of EVO and ICG was 2.0 mg/kg. A–C showed the liver function detection. D–F showed the kidney function detection. There were no significant differences between groups.