Literature DB >> 33511249

Facilitators and Barriers to Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Partnership Sustainability in the United States.

Tristen L Hall1, Charlene Barrientos-Ortiz2, Griselda Peña-Jackson3, Courtney Fultineer4, Kevin Werner4, Justine Sunshine4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Engaging patients in research can enhance relevance and accelerate implementation of findings. Despite investment in patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), short-term funding cannot maintain such efforts beyond the program timeframe. Sustained interaction between researchers, practitioners, patients, and other stakeholders is needed to sustain use of evidence-based practices and achieve maximum benefit. While previous literature describes components of public health program sustainability, such factors do not necessarily apply to the partnerships that implement those programs, and facilitators are likely to differ across disciplines. We sought to determine facilitators and barriers to PCOR partnership sustainability from participant experiences with sustainable and unsustainable community-academic partnerships across the United States.
METHODS: From 2017 to 2019, a collaboration representing public health institutes, community-based organizations, and academic organizations convened PCOR partnership members in virtual focus groups and conducted qualitative analysis to identify facilitators and barriers to partnership sustainability. A grounded theory framework, which applied a combination of a priori codes (barriers, facilitators, sustainable, not sustainable) and open coding, guided participant selection, data collection, and analysis across all project stages.
RESULTS: There was no single definition of partnership sustainability. Common facilitators of sustainability were investing time in relationships, connector role to promote communication and trust, equal power dynamics, shared motivation for participation, partnership institutionalization, and reciprocity. Barriers to partnership sustainability included external factors influencing participation and operations, funding-related challenges, and lack of institutionalization.
CONCLUSIONS: PCOR partnerships should incorporate an early and ongoing focus on relationship development through intentional efforts to collaborate with specific partners and stakeholders according to the goals of the research. This would allow more patients to access the evidence-based practices resulting from research investments.
© 2021 Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCOR; focus groups; patient-centered care; program evaluation; program sustainability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33511249      PMCID: PMC7834171          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  20 in total

1.  A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Ethan Basch; Joe V Selby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Jennifer Huang; Paula Darby Lipman; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Community-based participatory research: partnering with communities for effective and sustainable behavioral health interventions.

Authors:  Laura M Bogart; Kimberly Uyeda
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

Authors:  Lawrence A Palinkas; Sarah M Horwitz; Carla A Green; Jennifer P Wisdom; Naihua Duan; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-09

Review 6.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Karen Hacker; Shalini A Tendulkar; Catlin Rideout; Nazmim Bhuiya; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Clara P Savage; Milagro Grullon; Hal Strelnick; Carolyn Leung; Ann DiGirolamo
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012

8.  Sustainability considerations for health research and analytic data infrastructures.

Authors:  Adam Wilcox; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Peter Embi; Hui Cao; Gilad J Kuperman
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-09-17

9.  Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers.

Authors:  Ylona Chun Tie; Melanie Birks; Karen Francis
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-01-02

10.  The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.

Authors:  David A Chambers; Russell E Glasgow; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the Impacts of Patient Engagement on Health Services Research Teams: Lessons from the Veteran Consulting Network.

Authors:  Vanessa L Merker; Justeen K Hyde; Abigail Herbst; Amanda K Solch; David C Mohr; Lauren Gaj; Kelly Dvorin; Eileen M Dryden
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.