Literature DB >> 33511090

Improving Informed Consent for Novel Vaccine Research in a Pediatric Hospital Setting Using a Blended Research-Design Approach.

Sally M Jackson1, Margherita Daverio2, Silvia Lorenzo Perez3, Francesco Gesualdo1, Alberto E Tozzi1.   

Abstract

It is necessary to conduct Clinical Trials in children, including for novel vaccines. Children cannot legally provide valid consent, but can assent to research participation. Informed consent and assent communications are frequently criticized for their lack of comprehensibility and often, researchers do not involve patients in informed consent design. We tested a blended research-design approach to co-design multimedia informed consent prototypes for experimental vaccine studies targeted at the pediatric population. We report details on the methodology utilized, and the insights, ideas, and prototype solutions we generated using social media data analysis, a survey, and workshops. A survey of clinical trial researchers indicated that while the most did not use technology for informed consent, they considered its utilization favorable. Social media analysis enabled researchers to quickly understand where community perspectives were concordant and discordant and build their understanding of the types of topics that they may want to focus on during the design workshops. Participatory design workshops for children and their families reaped insights, ideas, and prototypes for a range of tools including apps and websites. Participants felt that the prototypes were better able to communicate necessary content than the original text document format. We propose using a participatory, mixed-methods approach to design informed consent so that it is better adapted to patients' needs. Such an approach would be helpful in better addressing the needs of different segments of the populations involved in clinical trials. Further evidence should be gained about the impact of this strategy in improving recruitment, decreasing withdrawals and litigations, and improving patient satisfaction during clinical trials.
Copyright © 2021 Jackson, Daverio, Perez, Gesualdo and Tozzi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research; design thinking (DT); ethics; inclusion; informed consent; mixed-methods; natural language processing (nlp); vaccination

Year:  2021        PMID: 33511090      PMCID: PMC7835206          DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.520803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pediatr        ISSN: 2296-2360            Impact factor:   3.418


  29 in total

1.  The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years.

Authors:  O Berger; B H Grønberg; K Sand; S Kaasa; J H Loge
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation.

Authors:  Sharief Hendricks; Nailah Conrad; Tania S Douglas; Tinashe Mutsvangwa
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2018-06-28

3.  Trust and consent: a prospective study on parents' perspective during a neonatal trial.

Authors:  Sonia Dahan; Camille Jung; Gilles Dassieu; Xavier Durrmeyer; Laurence Caeymaex
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Human-Centered Design as an Approach for Place-Based Innovation in Public Health: A Case Study from Oakland, California.

Authors:  Jessica Vechakul; Bina Patel Shrimali; Jaspal S Sandhu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Rosemary Moore
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  The ethics of neonatal research: An ethicist's and a parents' perspective.

Authors:  Annie Janvier; Barbara Farlow
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.

Authors:  K J Tarnowski; D M Allen; C Mayhall; P A Kelly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation.

Authors:  Jess P Roberts; Thomas R Fisher; Matthew J Trowbridge; Christine Bent
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 9.  Human-centred design in global health: A scoping review of applications and contexts.

Authors:  Alessandra N Bazzano; Jane Martin; Elaine Hicks; Maille Faughnan; Laura Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?

Authors:  Valerie Shilling; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  3 in total

1.  Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Gesualdo; Margherita Daverio; Laura Palazzani; Dimitris Dimitriou; Javier Diez-Domingo; Jaime Fons-Martinez; Sally Jackson; Pascal Vignally; Caterina Rizzo; Alberto Eugenio Tozzi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Informed Consent and Protection of Personal Data in Genetic Research on COVID-19.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Fedeli; Roberto Scendoni; Mariano Cingolani; Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci; Roberto Cirocchi; Nunzia Cannovo
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Informed consent and assent guide for paediatric clinical trials in Europe.

Authors:  Pirkko Lepola; Maxine Kindred; Viviana Giannuzzi; Heidi Glosli; Martine Dehlinger-Kremer; Harris Dalrymple; David Neubauer; Geraldine B Boylan; Jean Conway; Jo Dewhurst; Diane Hoffman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.920

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.