Literature DB >> 33510235

Foraging niche partitioning in sympatric seabird populations.

Christina Petalas1,2, Thomas Lazarus3, Raphael A Lavoie4, Kyle H Elliott3, Mélanie F Guigueno5.   

Abstract

Sympatric species must sufficiently differentiate aspects of their ecological niche to alleviate complete interspecific competition and stably coexist within the same area. Seabirds provide a unique opportunity to understand patterns of niche segregation among coexisting species because they form large multi-species colonies of breeding aggregations with seemingly overlapping diets and foraging areas. Recent biologging tools have revealed that colonial seabirds can differentiate components of their foraging strategies. Specifically, small, diving birds with high wing-loading may have small foraging radii compared with larger or non-diving birds. In the Gulf of St-Lawrence in Canada, we investigated whether and how niche differentiation occurs in four incubating seabird species breeding sympatrically using GPS-tracking and direct field observations of prey items carried by adults to chicks: the Atlantic puffin (Fratercula arctica), razorbill (Alca torda), common murre (Uria aalge), and black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla). Although there was overlap at foraging hotspots, all species differentiated in either diet (prey species, size and number) or foraging range. Whereas puffins and razorbills consumed multiple smaller prey items that were readily available closer to the colony, murres selected larger more diverse prey that were accessible due to their deeper diving capability. Kittiwakes compensated for their surface foraging by having a large foraging range, including foraging largely at a specific distant hotspot. These foraging habitat specialisations may alleviate high interspecific competition allowing for their coexistence, providing insight on multispecies colonial living.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33510235     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81583-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  10 in total

1.  Space partitioning without territoriality in gannets.

Authors:  Ewan D Wakefield; Thomas W Bodey; Stuart Bearhop; Jez Blackburn; Kendrew Colhoun; Rachel Davies; Ross G Dwyer; Jonathan A Green; David Grémillet; Andrew L Jackson; Mark J Jessopp; Adam Kane; Rowena H W Langston; Amélie Lescroël; Stuart Murray; Mélanie Le Nuz; Samantha C Patrick; Clara Péron; Louise M Soanes; Sarah Wanless; Stephen C Votier; Keith C Hamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Influence of wing loading on the trade-off between pursuit-diving and flight in common guillemots and razorbills.

Authors:  C B Thaxter; S Wanless; F Daunt; M P Harris; S Benvenuti; Y Watanuki; D Grémillet; K C Hamer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism.

Authors:  Christopher A Johnson; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Competition drives trait evolution and character displacement between Mimulus species along an environmental gradient.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kooyers; Brooke James; Benjamin K Blackman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Windscapes shape seabird instantaneous energy costs but adult behavior buffers impact on offspring.

Authors:  Kyle Hamish Elliott; Lorraine S Chivers; Lauren Bessey; Anthony J Gaston; Scott A Hatch; Akiko Kato; Orla Osborne; Yan Ropert-Coudert; John R Speakman; James F Hare
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Actual and 'optimum' flight speeds: field data reassessed

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins.

Authors:  Kyle H Elliott; Robert E Ricklefs; Anthony J Gaston; Scott A Hatch; John R Speakman; Gail K Davoren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sympatric breeding auks shift between dietary and spatial resource partitioning across the annual cycle.

Authors:  Jannie Fries Linnebjerg; Jérôme Fort; Tim Guilford; Anna Reuleaux; Anders Mosbech; Morten Frederiksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Thomas Cornulier; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Ian M Davies; Justin M J Travis; Beth E Scott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Modelling the effects of prey size and distribution on prey capture rates of two sympatric marine predators.

Authors:  Chris B Thaxter; Francis Daunt; David Grémillet; Mike P Harris; Silvano Benvenuti; Yutaka Watanuki; Keith C Hamer; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.