Literature DB >> 20228337

Influence of wing loading on the trade-off between pursuit-diving and flight in common guillemots and razorbills.

C B Thaxter1, S Wanless, F Daunt, M P Harris, S Benvenuti, Y Watanuki, D Grémillet, K C Hamer.   

Abstract

Species of bird that use their wings for underwater propulsion are thought to face evolutionary trade-offs between flight and diving, leading to the prediction that species with different wing areas relative to body mass (i.e. different wing loadings) also differ in the relative importance of flight and diving activity during foraging trips. We tested this hypothesis for two similarly sized species of Alcidae (common guillemots and razorbills) by using bird-borne devices to examine three-dimensional foraging behaviour at a single colony. Guillemots have 30% higher wing loading than razorbills and, in keeping with this difference, razorbills spent twice as long in flight as a proportion of trip duration whereas guillemots spent twice as long in diving activity. Razorbills made a large number of short, relatively shallow dives and spent little time in the bottom phase of the dive whereas guillemots made fewer dives but frequently attained depths suggesting that they were near the seabed (ca. 35-70 m). The bottom phase of dives by guillemots was relatively long, indicating that they spent considerable time searching for and pursuing prey. Guillemots also spent a greater proportion of each dive bout underwater and had faster rates of descent, indicating that they were more adept at maximising time for pursuit and capture of prey. These differences in foraging behaviour may partly reflect guillemots feeding their chicks single large prey obtained near the bottom and razorbills feeding their chicks multiple prey from the water column. Nonetheless, our data support the notion that interspecific differences in wing loadings of auks reflect an evolutionary trade-off between aerial and underwater locomotion.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20228337     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.037390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Tidal drift removes the need for area-restricted search in foraging Atlantic puffins.

Authors:  Ashley Bennison; John L Quinn; Alison Debney; Mark Jessopp
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins.

Authors:  Kyle H Elliott; Robert E Ricklefs; Anthony J Gaston; Scott A Hatch; John R Speakman; Gail K Davoren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Wing Musculature Reconstruction in Extinct Flightless Auks (Pinguinus and Mancalla) Reveals Incomplete Convergence with Penguins (Spheniscidae) Due to Differing Ancestral States.

Authors:  Junya Watanabe; Daniel J Field; Hiroshige Matsuoka
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-11-11

4.  Sympatric breeding auks shift between dietary and spatial resource partitioning across the annual cycle.

Authors:  Jannie Fries Linnebjerg; Jérôme Fort; Tim Guilford; Anna Reuleaux; Anders Mosbech; Morten Frederiksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The use of an unsupervised learning approach for characterizing latent behaviors in accelerometer data.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Thomas Cornulier; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Ian M Davies; Justin M J Travis; Beth E Scott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Thomas Cornulier; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Ian M Davies; Justin M J Travis; Beth E Scott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Alcids 'fly' at efficient Strouhal numbers in both air and water but vary stroke velocity and angle.

Authors:  Anthony B Lapsansky; Daniel Zatz; Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Parents are a drag: long-lived birds share the cost of increased foraging effort with their offspring, but males pass on more of the costs than females.

Authors:  Shoshanah R Jacobs; Kyle Hamish Elliott; Anthony J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modelling the effects of prey size and distribution on prey capture rates of two sympatric marine predators.

Authors:  Chris B Thaxter; Francis Daunt; David Grémillet; Mike P Harris; Silvano Benvenuti; Yutaka Watanuki; Keith C Hamer; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Foraging flexibility and search patterns are unlinked during breeding in a free-ranging seabird.

Authors:  Akiko Shoji; Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Dave Boyle; Annette Fayet; Ben Dean; Holly Kirk; Robin Freeman; Chris Perrins; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.