BACKGROUND: The Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for COVID-19 (REMAP-COVID) trial is a global adaptive platform trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We describe implementation at the first US site, the UPMC health system, and offer recommendations for implementation at other sites. METHODS: To implement REMAP-COVID, we focused on six major areas: engaging leadership, trial embedment, remote consent and enrollment, regulatory compliance, modification of traditional trial management procedures, and alignment with other COVID-19 studies. RESULTS: We recommend aligning institutional and trial goals and sharing a vision of REMAP-COVID implementation as groundwork for learning health system development. Embedment of trial procedures into routine care processes, existing institutional structures, and the electronic health record promotes efficiency and integration of clinical care and clinical research. Remote consent and enrollment can be facilitated by engaging bedside providers and leveraging institutional videoconferencing tools. Coordination with the central institutional review board will expedite the approval process. Protocol adherence, adverse event monitoring, and data collection and export can be facilitated by building electronic health record processes, though implementation can start using traditional clinical trial tools. Lastly, establishment of a centralized institutional process optimizes coordination of COVID-19 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the REMAP-COVID trial within a large US healthcare system is feasible and facilitated by multidisciplinary collaboration. This investment establishes important groundwork for future learning health system endeavors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02735707 . Registered on 13 April 2016.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for COVID-19 (REMAP-COVID) trial is a global adaptive platform trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We describe implementation at the first US site, the UPMC health system, and offer recommendations for implementation at other sites. METHODS: To implement REMAP-COVID, we focused on six major areas: engaging leadership, trial embedment, remote consent and enrollment, regulatory compliance, modification of traditional trial management procedures, and alignment with other COVID-19 studies. RESULTS: We recommend aligning institutional and trial goals and sharing a vision of REMAP-COVID implementation as groundwork for learning health system development. Embedment of trial procedures into routine care processes, existing institutional structures, and the electronic health record promotes efficiency and integration of clinical care and clinical research. Remote consent and enrollment can be facilitated by engaging bedside providers and leveraging institutional videoconferencing tools. Coordination with the central institutional review board will expedite the approval process. Protocol adherence, adverse event monitoring, and data collection and export can be facilitated by building electronic health record processes, though implementation can start using traditional clinical trial tools. Lastly, establishment of a centralized institutional process optimizes coordination of COVID-19 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the REMAP-COVID trial within a large US healthcare system is feasible and facilitated by multidisciplinary collaboration. This investment establishes important groundwork for future learning health system endeavors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02735707 . Registered on 13 April 2016.
Authors: Francesca Schiavone; Riya Bathia; Krishna Letchemanan; Lindsey Masters; Claire Amos; Anna Bara; Louise Brown; Clare Gilson; Cheryl Pugh; Nafisah Atako; Fleur Hudson; Mahesh Parmar; Ruth Langley; Richard S Kaplan; Chris Parker; Gert Attard; Noel W Clarke; Silke Gillessen; Nicholas D James; Tim Maughan; Matthew R Sydes Journal: Trials Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Liz Morrell; Joshua Hordern; Louise Brown; Matthew R Sydes; Claire L Amos; Richard S Kaplan; Mahesh K B Parmar; Timothy S Maughan Journal: Trials Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Dominic Hague; Stephen Townsend; Lindsey Masters; Mary Rauchenberger; Nadine Van Looy; Carlos Diaz-Montana; Melissa Gannon; Nicholas James; Tim Maughan; Mahesh K B Parmar; Louise Brown; Matthew R Sydes Journal: Trials Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Katherine Moll Reitz; Christopher W Seymour; Jennifer Vates; Melanie Quintana; Kert Viele; Michelle Detry; Michael Morowitz; Alison Morris; Barbara Methe; Jason Kennedy; Brian Zuckerbraun; Timothy D Girard; Oscar C Marroquin; Stephen Esper; Jennifer Holder-Murray; Anne B Newman; Scott Berry; Derek C Angus; Matthew Neal Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Richard B Berry; Alexandre R Abreu; Vidya Krishnan; Stuart F Quan; Patrick J Strollo; Raman K Malhotra Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Faraaz Ali Shah; Nuala J Meyer; Derek C Angus; Rana Awdish; Élie Azoulay; Carolyn S Calfee; Gilles Clermont; Anthony C Gordon; Arthur Kwizera; Aleksandra Leligdowicz; John C Marshall; Carmen Mikacenic; Pratik Sinha; Balasubramanian Venkatesh; Hector R Wong; Fernando G Zampieri; Sachin Yende Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-10-15 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Martin Sebastian Winkler; Ralf Alexander Claus; Mareike Schilder; Stefan Pöhlmann; Sina M Coldewey; Julian Grundmann; Torben Fricke; Onnen Moerer; Konrad Meissner; Michael Bauer; Heike Hofmann-Winkler; Markus H Gräler Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Donna R Rivera; Paul G Kluetz; Kald Abdallah; Sundeep Agrawal; Derek C Angus; Robert M Califf; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Randall Hyer; Douglas R Lowy; Samir N Khleif Journal: Cancer J Date: 2022 Mar-Apr 01 Impact factor: 2.074