Zhaoguo Yue1,2,3,4, Qi Liu5, Haidong Zhang1,2,3,4, Jingwen Yang2,3,4,6, Jianxia Hou7,8,9,10. 1. Department of Periodontology, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. 2. National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. 3. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. 4. Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. 5. BYBO Dental Hospital, Qinian Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100062, China. 6. Department of Prosthetics, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. 7. Department of Periodontology, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. jxhou@163.com. 8. National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. jxhou@163.com. 9. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. jxhou@163.com. 10. Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. jxhou@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The volume of residual alveolar bone is critical to the survival of dental implants. When the volume of alveolar bone in the posterior maxillary region is less than 4 mm, maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) with the lateral approach is an effective option. Traditionally, this standard approach is usually conducted at 4-6 months after tooth extraction (standard MSFE). However, defective dentition due to extraction can impair mastication during the period of bone remodeling, especially if the molars on both sides are severely compromised and must be extracted. MSFE before extraction (modified MSFE) can take full advantage of residual tooth strength. However, the effectiveness and practicability of the modified MSFE procedure remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of modified vs. standard MSFE, in order to provide references to periodontists. METHODS/ DESIGN: The study cohort included 25 adult patients (50 surgery sites) recruited from Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology who met the inclusion criteria. The two sides of each patient will be randomly divided into two groups: a test group-modified MSFE or a control group-standard MSFE. The surgical duration and patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scale for discomfort) will be documented. Clinical indicators, including implant survival rates, mucosal conditions, and complications, will be recorded every 6 months during the 5-year follow-up period. The volume of the alveolar bone and marginal bone level will be assessed radiographically (cone-beam CT and periapical films) every 6 months. Histological analysis of biopsy samples retrieved from both sides will be performed to evaluate the biological features of the bone. DISCUSSION: The current study will explore the implant survival rates, safety, reliability, effectiveness, and practicability of the modified MSFE procedure. Moreover, the extent of osteogenesis on the sinus floor will also be assessed. The results of this trial will provide strategies for the modified MSFE procedure to achieve ideal clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ChiCTR1900020648 . Registered on 1 January 2019.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The volume of residual alveolar bone is critical to the survival of dental implants. When the volume of alveolar bone in the posterior maxillary region is less than 4 mm, maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) with the lateral approach is an effective option. Traditionally, this standard approach is usually conducted at 4-6 months after tooth extraction (standard MSFE). However, defective dentition due to extraction can impair mastication during the period of bone remodeling, especially if the molars on both sides are severely compromised and must be extracted. MSFE before extraction (modified MSFE) can take full advantage of residual tooth strength. However, the effectiveness and practicability of the modified MSFE procedure remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of modified vs. standard MSFE, in order to provide references to periodontists. METHODS/ DESIGN: The study cohort included 25 adult patients (50 surgery sites) recruited from Peking University Hospital and School of Stomatology who met the inclusion criteria. The two sides of each patient will be randomly divided into two groups: a test group-modified MSFE or a control group-standard MSFE. The surgical duration and patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scale for discomfort) will be documented. Clinical indicators, including implant survival rates, mucosal conditions, and complications, will be recorded every 6 months during the 5-year follow-up period. The volume of the alveolar bone and marginal bone level will be assessed radiographically (cone-beam CT and periapical films) every 6 months. Histological analysis of biopsy samples retrieved from both sides will be performed to evaluate the biological features of the bone. DISCUSSION: The current study will explore the implant survival rates, safety, reliability, effectiveness, and practicability of the modified MSFE procedure. Moreover, the extent of osteogenesis on the sinus floor will also be assessed. The results of this trial will provide strategies for the modified MSFE procedure to achieve ideal clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ChiCTR1900020648 . Registered on 1 January 2019.
Authors: E Dogan; E Dursun; E Tosun; E Bilgic; A C Akman; K Orhan; H H Celik; P Korkusuz; F Caglayan Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 2.789