Daisuke Kanda1, Takuro Takumi2, Takeshi Sonoda2, Ryo Arikawa2, Kazuhiro Anzaki2, Yuichi Sasaki2, Mitsuru Ohishi2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Hypertension, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan. kanchan@m3.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Hypertension, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pericardiocentesis is frequently performed when fluid needs to be removed from the pericardial sac, for both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes, however, it can still be a high-risk procedure in inexperienced hands and/or an emergent setting. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old male made an emergency call complaining of the back pain. When the ambulance crew arrived at his home, he was in a state of shock due to cardiac tamponade diagnosed by portable echocardiography. The pericardiocentesis was performed using a puncture needle on site, and the patient was immediately transferred to our hospital by helicopter. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a small protrusion of contrast media on the inferior wall of the left ventricle, suggesting cardiac rupture due to acute myocardial infarction. Emergency coronary angiography was then performed, which confirmed occlusion of the posterior descending branch of the left circumflex coronary artery. In addition, extravasation of contrast medium due to coronary artery perforation was observed in the acute marginal branch of the right coronary artery. We considered that coronary artery perforation had occurred as a complication of the pericardial puncture. We therefore performed transcatheter coil embolization of the perforated branch, and angiography confirmed immediate vessel sealing and hemostasis. After the procedure, the patient made steady progress without a further increase in pericardial effusion, and was discharged on the 50th day after admission. CONCLUSIONS: When performing pericardial drainage, it is important that the physician recognizes the correct procedure and complications of pericardiocentesis, and endeavors to minimize the occurrence of serious complications. As with the patient presented, coil embolization is an effective treatment for distal coronary artery perforation caused by pericardiocentesis.
BACKGROUND: Pericardiocentesis is frequently performed when fluid needs to be removed from the pericardial sac, for both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes, however, it can still be a high-risk procedure in inexperienced hands and/or an emergent setting. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old male made an emergency call complaining of the back pain. When the ambulance crew arrived at his home, he was in a state of shock due to cardiac tamponade diagnosed by portable echocardiography. The pericardiocentesis was performed using a puncture needle on site, and the patient was immediately transferred to our hospital by helicopter. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a small protrusion of contrast media on the inferior wall of the left ventricle, suggesting cardiac rupture due to acute myocardial infarction. Emergency coronary angiography was then performed, which confirmed occlusion of the posterior descending branch of the left circumflex coronary artery. In addition, extravasation of contrast medium due to coronary artery perforation was observed in the acute marginal branch of the right coronary artery. We considered that coronary artery perforation had occurred as a complication of the pericardial puncture. We therefore performed transcatheter coil embolization of the perforated branch, and angiography confirmed immediate vessel sealing and hemostasis. After the procedure, the patient made steady progress without a further increase in pericardial effusion, and was discharged on the 50th day after admission. CONCLUSIONS: When performing pericardial drainage, it is important that the physician recognizes the correct procedure and complications of pericardiocentesis, and endeavors to minimize the occurrence of serious complications. As with the patient presented, coil embolization is an effective treatment for distal coronary artery perforation caused by pericardiocentesis.
Authors: Arsen D Ristić; Massimo Imazio; Yehuda Adler; Aristides Anastasakis; Luigi P Badano; Antonio Brucato; Alida L P Caforio; Olivier Dubourg; Perry Elliott; Juan Gimeno; Tiina Helio; Karin Klingel; Aleš Linhart; Bernhard Maisch; Bongani Mayosi; Jens Mogensen; Yigal Pinto; Hubert Seggewiss; Petar M Seferović; Luigi Tavazzi; Witold Tomkowski; Philippe Charron Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Teresa S M Tsang; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; William K Freeman; Marion E Barnes; Lawrence J Sinak; Bernard J Gersh; Kent R Bailey; James B Seward Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: S G Ellis; S Ajluni; A Z Arnold; J J Popma; J A Bittl; N L Eigler; M J Cowley; R E Raymond; R D Safian; P L Whitlow Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexander Verevkin; Konstantin von Aspern; Sergey Leontyev; Sven Lehmann; Michael A Borger; Piroze M Davierwala Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 5.501