Literature DB >> 30482483

A contemporary look at pericardiocentesis.

P R Sinnaeve1, T Adriaenssens2.   

Abstract

Percutaneous drainage is the default strategy for evacuating a pericardial effusion. A pericardiocentesis can be necessary or required in a wide variety of clinical settings ranging from urgent tamponade to relieve in iatrogenic hemorrhagic effusions in the electrophysiology or catheterization room, to planned diagnostic procedures in patients with suspected or known malignancy or infections. With the help of several procedural improvements over the past decades, echocardiography and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pericardiocentesis has become the standard intervention for evacuating pericardial effusions, as well as an essential tool in the diagnostic work-up of an unexplained pericardial effusion. When performed by skilled physicians assisted by appropriate imaging it is a very safe procedure, and provided that an indwelling catheter is placed, it is also very effective with an acceptably low risk of recurrences. In this review, the indications and standard techniques for pericardiocentesis are discussed, as well as their consequences for patients with iatrogenic and malignant effusions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malignancy; Pericardial effusion; Pericardiocentesis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482483     DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1050-1738            Impact factor:   6.677


  8 in total

1.  What is the ideal approach for emergent pericardiocentesis using point-of-care ultrasound guidance?

Authors:  Lori Stolz; Elaine Situ-LaCasse; Josie Acuña; Matthew Thompson; Nicolaus Hawbaker; Josephine Valenzuela; Uwe Stolz; Srikar Adhikari
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Pericardial Drain Placement in Interventional Radiology: An Overview.

Authors:  Josi L Herren; HingKui Chan; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

3.  Treatment of acute cardiac tamponade: A retrospective analysis of classical intermittent versus continuous pericardial drainage.

Authors:  Christopher Stremmel; Clemens Scherer; Enzo Lüsebrink; Danny Kupka; Teresa Schmid; Thomas Stocker; Antonia Kellnar; Jan Kleeberger; Moritz F Sinner; Tobias Petzold; Julinda Mehilli; Daniel Braun; Mathias Orban; Jörg Hausleiter; Steffen Massberg; Martin Orban
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-02-05

4.  Coronary artery perforation secondary to lifesaving pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade: a case report.

Authors:  Daisuke Kanda; Takuro Takumi; Takeshi Sonoda; Ryo Arikawa; Kazuhiro Anzaki; Yuichi Sasaki; Mitsuru Ohishi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Acute Marginal Artery Laceration as a Complication of Pericardiocentesis.

Authors:  Boskey Patel; Sai Vikram Alampoondi Venkataramanan; Robert Bojar; Mark Kranis; Mazen Roumia
Journal:  JACC Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Feasibility and safety of CT-aided pericardiocentesis from a subxiphoid anterior approach by using fluoroscopy in patients with chronic pericardial effusions.

Authors:  Yu-Ki Iwasaki; Yuhi Fujimoto; Kanako Ito-Hagiwara; Eiichiro Oka; Hiroshi Hayashi; Yoshiaki Kubota; Hiroshige Murata; Teppei Yamamoto; Hideki Miyachi; Shuhei Tara; Yukichi Tokita; Kenji Yodogawa; Takeshi Yamamoto; Hitoshi Takano; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.287

7.  The safety of pericardiocentesis in patients under antithrombotic therapy: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Yuansong Zhu; Chengxiang Zhang; Yuqiao Xie; Bryan Richard Sasmita; Zhenxian Xiang; Yi Jiang; Ming Gong; Yaxin Wang; Siyu Chen; Suxin Luo; Bi Huang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-21

8.  Unveiling the causes of pericardial effusion in a contemporary case series of pericardiocentesis in Latin America.

Authors:  Juan Hernando Del Portillo-Navarrete; Alejandro Pizano; Jhonattan Benavides; Andres M Palacio; Karen Moreno-Medina; Jaime Cabrales; Darío Echeverri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.