Literature DB >> 33507967

Identifying bedrest using waist-worn triaxial accelerometers in preschool children.

J Dustin Tracy1, Thomas Donnelly2, Evan C Sommer3, William J Heerman3, Shari L Barkin3, Maciej S Buchowski2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To adapt and validate a previously developed decision tree for youth to identify bedrest for use in preschool children.
METHODS: Parents of healthy preschool (3-6-year-old) children (n = 610; 294 males) were asked to help them to wear an accelerometer for 7 to 10 days and 24 hours/day on their waist. Children with ≥3 nights of valid recordings were randomly allocated to the development (n = 200) and validation (n = 200) groups. Wear periods from accelerometer recordings were identified minute-by-minute as bedrest or wake using visual identification by two independent raters. To automate visual identification, chosen decision tree (DT) parameters (block length, threshold, bedrest-start trigger, and bedrest-end trigger) were optimized in the development group using a Nelder-Mead simplex optimization method, which maximized the accuracy of DT-identified bedrest in 1-min epochs against synchronized visually identified bedrest (n = 4,730,734). DT's performance with optimized parameters was compared with the visual identification, commonly used Sadeh's sleep detection algorithm, DT for youth (10-18-years-old), and parental survey of sleep duration in the validation group.
RESULTS: On average, children wore an accelerometer for 8.3 days and 20.8 hours/day. Comparing the DT-identified bedrest with visual identification in the validation group yielded sensitivity = 0.941, specificity = 0.974, and accuracy = 0.956. The optimal block length was 36 min, the threshold 230 counts/min, the bedrest-start trigger 305 counts/min, and the bedrest-end trigger 1,129 counts/min. In the validation group, DT identified bedrest with greater accuracy than Sadeh's algorithm (0.956 and 0.902) and DT for youth (0.956 and 0.861) (both P<0.001). Both DT (564±77 min/day) and Sadeh's algorithm (604±80 min/day) identified significantly less bedrest/sleep than parental survey (650±81 min/day) (both P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The DT-based algorithm initially developed for youth was adapted for preschool children to identify time spent in bedrest with high accuracy. The DT is available as a package for the R open-source software environment ("PhysActBedRest").

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507967      PMCID: PMC7842939          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  36 in total

1.  The SBSM Guide to Actigraphy Monitoring: Clinical and Research Applications.

Authors:  Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Jennifer L Martin; Terri Blackwell; Luis Buenaver; Lianqi Liu; Lisa J Meltzer; Avi Sadeh; Adam P Spira; Daniel J Taylor
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.964

2.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Comment on "estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip and wrist".

Authors:  Patty S Freedson; Dinesh John
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Sleep, emotional and behavioral difficulties in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Alice M Gregory; Avi Sadeh
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 11.609

5.  Effect of sampling rate on acceleration and counts of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in children.

Authors:  Kimberly A Clevenger; Karin A Pfeiffer; Kelly A Mackintosh; Melitta A McNarry; Jan Brønd; Daniel Arvidsson; Alexander H K Montoye
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults.

Authors:  Joanne A McVeigh; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Genevieve N Healy; James Slater; Peter R Eastwood; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  National Sleep Foundation's sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary.

Authors:  Max Hirshkowitz; Kaitlyn Whiton; Steven M Albert; Cathy Alessi; Oliviero Bruni; Lydia DonCarlos; Nancy Hazen; John Herman; Eliot S Katz; Leila Kheirandish-Gozal; David N Neubauer; Anne E O'Donnell; Maurice Ohayon; John Peever; Robert Rawding; Ramesh C Sachdeva; Belinda Setters; Michael V Vitiello; J Catesby Ware; Paula J Adams Hillard
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2015-01-08

8.  A comparison of actigraphy and parental report of sleep habits in typically developing children aged 6 to 11 years.

Authors:  Simone Holley; Catherine M Hill; Jim Stevenson
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Agreement rates between actigraphy, diary, and questionnaire for children's sleep patterns.

Authors:  Helene Werner; Luciano Molinari; Caroline Guyer; Oskar G Jenni
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2008-04

10.  Identifying bedrest using 24-h waist or wrist accelerometry in adults.

Authors:  J Dustin Tracy; Sari Acra; Kong Y Chen; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of Measurement Tools Used to Assess Sleep of Pre-school Aged Children: A Systematic Rapid Review.

Authors:  Sophie M Phillips; Carolyn Summerbell; Helen L Ball; Kathryn R Hesketh; Sonia Saxena; Frances C Hillier-Brown
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Parental Views on the Acceptability and Feasibility of Measurement Tools Used to Assess Movement Behaviour of Pre-School Children: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sophie M Phillips; Carolyn Summerbell; Kathryn R Hesketh; Sonia Saxena; Frances C Hillier-Brown
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.