Literature DB >> 33507867

Multi-Site Infant Brain Segmentation Algorithms: The iSeg-2019 Challenge.

Yue Sun, Kun Gao, Zhengwang Wu, Guannan Li, Xiaopeng Zong, Zhihao Lei, Ying Wei, Jun Ma, Xiaoping Yang, Xue Feng, Li Zhao, Trung Le Phan, Jitae Shin, Tao Zhong, Yu Zhang, Lequan Yu, Caizi Li, Ramesh Basnet, M Omair Ahmad, M N S Swamy, Wenao Ma, Qi Dou, Toan Duc Bui, Camilo Bermudez Noguera, Bennett Landman, Ian H Gotlib, Kathryn L Humphreys, Sarah Shultz, Longchuan Li, Sijie Niu, Weili Lin, Valerie Jewells, Dinggang Shen, Gang Li, Li Wang.   

Abstract

To better understand early brain development in health and disorder, it is critical to accurately segment infant brain magnetic resonance (MR) images into white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Deep learning-based methods have achieved state-of-the-art performance; h owever, one of the major limitations is that the learning-based methods may suffer from the multi-site issue, that is, the models trained on a dataset from one site may not be applicable to the datasets acquired from other sites with different imaging protocols/scanners. To promote methodological development in the community, the iSeg-2019 challenge (http://iseg2019.web.unc.edu) provides a set of 6-month infant subjects from multiple sites with different protocols/scanners for the participating methods. T raining/validation subjects are from UNC (MAP) and testing subjects are from UNC/UMN (BCP), Stanford University, and Emory University. By the time of writing, there are 30 automatic segmentation methods participated in the iSeg-2019. In this article, 8 top-ranked methods were reviewed by detailing their pipelines/implementations, presenting experimental results, and evaluating performance across different sites in terms of whole brain, regions of interest, and gyral landmark curves. We further pointed out their limitations and possible directions for addressing the multi-site issue. We find that multi-site consistency is still an open issue. We hope that the multi-site dataset in the iSeg-2019 and this review article will attract more researchers to address the challenging and critical multi-site issue in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507867      PMCID: PMC8246057          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3055428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  27 in total

1.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  HyperDense-Net: A Hyper-Densely Connected CNN for Multi-Modal Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Jose Dolz; Karthik Gopinath; Jing Yuan; Herve Lombaert; Christian Desrosiers; Ismail Ben Ayed
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Brain functional development separates into three distinct time periods in the first two years of life.

Authors:  Weiyan Yin; Meng-Hsiang Chen; Sheng-Che Hung; Kristine R Baluyot; Tengfei Li; Weili Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Volume-Based Analysis of 6-Month-Old Infant Brain MRI for Autism Biomarker Identification and Early Diagnosis.

Authors:  Li Wang; Gang Li; Feng Shi; Xiaohuan Cao; Chunfeng Lian; Dong Nie; Mingxia Liu; Han Zhang; Guannan Li; Zhengwang Wu; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2018-09-13

5.  Morphology-driven automatic segmentation of MR images of the neonatal brain.

Authors:  Laura Gui; Radoslaw Lisowski; Tamara Faundez; Petra S Hüppi; François Lazeyras; Michel Kocher
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Brain volume findings in 6-month-old infants at high familial risk for autism.

Authors:  Heather Cody Hazlett; Hongbin Gu; Robert C McKinstry; Dennis W W Shaw; Kelly N Botteron; Stephen R Dager; Martin Styner; Clement Vachet; Guido Gerig; Sarah J Paterson; Robert T Schultz; Annette M Estes; Alan C Evans; Joseph Piven
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Semi-supervised Transfer Learning for Infant Cerebellum Tissue Segmentation.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Kun Gao; Sijie Niu; Weili Lin; Gang Li; Li Wang
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 8.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multi-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation: The M&Ms Challenge.

Authors:  Victor M Campello; Polyxeni Gkontra; Cristian Izquierdo; Carlos Martin-Isla; Alireza Sojoudi; Peter M Full; Klaus Maier-Hein; Yao Zhang; Zhiqiang He; Jun Ma; Mario Parreno; Alberto Albiol; Fanwei Kong; Shawn C Shadden; Jorge Corral Acero; Vaanathi Sundaresan; Mina Saber; Mustafa Elattar; Hongwei Li; Bjoern Menze; Firas Khader; Christoph Haarburger; Cian M Scannell; Mitko Veta; Adam Carscadden; Kumaradevan Punithakumar; Xiao Liu; Sotirios A Tsaftaris; Xiaoqiong Huang; Xin Yang; Lei Li; Xiahai Zhuang; David Vilades; Martin L Descalzo; Andrea Guala; Lucia La Mura; Matthias G Friedrich; Ria Garg; Julie Lebel; Filipe Henriques; Mahir Karakas; Ersin Cavus; Steffen E Petersen; Sergio Escalera; Santi Segui; Jose F Rodriguez-Palomares; Karim Lekadir
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Matthew F Glasser; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; J Anthony Wilson; Timothy S Coalson; Bruce Fischl; Jesper L Andersson; Junqian Xu; Saad Jbabdi; Matthew Webster; Jonathan R Polimeni; David C Van Essen; Mark Jenkinson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  Harmonized neonatal brain MR image segmentation model for cross-site datasets.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Yue Sun; Zhenghan Fang; Weili Lin; Gang Li; Li Wang
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  PTNet3D: A 3D High-Resolution Longitudinal Infant Brain MRI Synthesizer Based on Transformers.

Authors:  Xuzhe Zhang; Xinzi He; Jia Guo; Nabil Ettehadi; Natalie Aw; David Semanek; Jonathan Posner; Andrew Laine; Yun Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 11.037

3.  SPHERICAL TRANSFORMER FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PEDIATRIC CORTICAL SURFACES.

Authors:  Jiale Cheng; Xin Zhang; Fenqiang Zhao; Zhengwang Wu; Ya Wang; Ying Huang; Weili Lin; Li Wang; Gang Li
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  Recurrent Tissue-Aware Network for Deformable Registration of Infant Brain MR Images.

Authors:  Dongming Wei; Sahar Ahmad; Yuyu Guo; Liyun Chen; Yunzhi Huang; Lei Ma; Zhengwang Wu; Gang Li; Li Wang; Weili Lin; Pew-Thian Yap; Dinggang Shen; Qian Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 11.037

5.  Multi-Scale Self-Supervised Learning for Multi-Site Pediatric Brain MR Image Segmentation with Motion/Gibbs Artifacts.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Kun Gao; Weili Lin; Gang Li; Sijie Niu; Li Wang
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2021-09-21

6.  Unified framework for early stage status prediction of autism based on infant structural magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kun Gao; Yue Sun; Sijie Niu; Li Wang
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.633

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.