Literature DB >> 33507351

Exploring the cognitive demands required for young adults to adjust online obstacle avoidance strategies.

Jenna Pitman1, Keara Sutherland1, Lori Ann Vallis2.   

Abstract

Humans integrate visual information about their surrounding environment to properly adapt their locomotion to step over or around obstacles in their path. We know that cognition aids in the execution of locomotion and in complex maneuvers such as obstacle avoidance. However, the role of the cognitive system in performing online adjustments to an obstacle avoidance strategy during locomotion has not yet been elucidated. Nineteen young adults instrumented with kinematic markers were asked to step over or circumvent an obstacle to the left or right. In half of these trials, participants were required to adjust this strategy when cued by LED lights two steps prior to obstacle crossing. In 75% of trials, a cognitive task was simultaneously presented (incongruent or congruent auditory Stroop cue, or neutral cue). Center of mass position and velocity was estimated and gait metrics (eg. step length) were calculated to quantify how individuals performed this last-minute direction change and determine how these responses changed when simultaneously performing a cognitive task. Results showed statistically shorter crossing steps, where the trailing limb was placed further from the leading edge and the lead limb was placed closer to the trailing edge when responding to the auditory Stroop task. Performing these avoidance strategy changes also decreased cognitive task performance. Our findings suggest that visually integrating a new stepping pattern to cross an obstacle is a complex locomotor maneuver, and requires the aid of the cognitive system to be performed effectively in a young adult population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-tasking; Gait; Locomotion; On-line obstacle avoidance; Stroop task; Sudden direction change; Visual integration

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507351     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emad Al-Yahya; Helen Dawes; Lesley Smith; Andrea Dennis; Ken Howells; Janet Cockburn
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  The circumvention of obstacles during walking in different environmental contexts: a comparison between older and younger adults.

Authors:  Martin Gérin-Lajoie; Carol L Richards; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Stepping over obstacles: attention demands and aging.

Authors:  Clare Harley; Richard M Wilkie; John P Wann
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults.

Authors:  H C Chen; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-11

Review 5.  Vertebrate locomotion--a lamprey perspective.

Authors:  S Grillner; D Parker; A el Manira
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Invariant structure in locomotion.

Authors:  P Das; G McCollum
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Effect of a cognitive task on online adjustments when avoiding stepping on an obstacle and stepping on a target during walking in young adults.

Authors:  Andréia Abud da Silva Costa; Luciana Oliveira Dos Santos; Renato Moraes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The visual guidance of action is not insulated from cognitive interference: A multitasking study on obstacle-avoidance and bisection.

Authors:  Frederic Göhringer; Miriam Löhr-Limpens; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2018-08-07

9.  Executive function correlates with walking speed in older persons: the InCHIANTI study.

Authors:  Alesandro Ble; Stefano Volpato; Giovanni Zuliani; Jack M Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Fulvio Lauretani; Benedetta Bartali; Cinzia Maraldi; Renato Fellin; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Stephanie Studenski; Mindy Katz; Charles Hall; Joe Verghese
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Dual Tasking during Trip Recovery and Obstacle Clearance among Young, Healthy Adults in Human Factors Research.

Authors:  Sachini N K Kodithuwakku Arachchige; Harish Chander; Adam C Knight; Reuben F Burch V; Chih-Chia Chen; Jennifer C Reneker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.