Literature DB >> 33506313

SARC-F as a case-finding tool for sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2. National validation and comparison with other diagnostic standards.

Karolina Piotrowicz1,2, Anna Głuszewska1,2, Joanna Czesak2,3, Małgorzata Fedyk-Łukasik1,2, Ewa Klimek1,2, Dolores Sánchez-Rodríguez4,5, Anna Skalska1,2, Barbara Gryglewska1,2, Tomasz Grodzicki1,2, Jerzy Gąsowski6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a potentially reversible condition, which requires proper screening and diagnosis. AIMS: To validate a Polish version of sarcopenia screening questionnaire (SARC-F), and assess its clinical performance.
METHODS: Cross-sectional validation study in community-dwelling subjects ≥ 65 years of age. Diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on the 2018 2nd European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) consensus. Hand grip and 4-m gait speed were measured, and the Polish version of SARC-F was administered.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of 73 participants (21.9% men) was 77.8 (7.3) years. Seventeen participants (23.3%) fulfilled the EWGSOP2 criteria of sarcopenia, and 9 (12.3%) criteria for severe sarcopenia. Fourteen (19.2%) participants fulfilled the SARC-F criteria for clinical suspicion of sarcopenia. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal was 0.84. With EWGSOP2 sarcopenia as a gold standard, the sensitivity of SARC-F was 35.3% (95% CI 14.2-61.7, p = 0.33), specificity was 85.7% (95% CI 73.8-93.6, p < 0.0001). The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 42.9% (p = 0.79) and 81.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively. The probability of false-positive result was 14.3% (95% CI 6.4-26.2, p < 0.0001) and the probability of false-negative result was 64.7% (95% CI 38.3-85.8, p = 0.33). Overall the predictive power of SARC-F was low (c-statistic 0.64). DISCUSSION: SARC-F is currently recommended for sarcopenia case finding in general population of older adults. However, its sensitivity is low, despite high specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: At present SARC-F is better suited to rule out sarcopenia then to case-finding. Further refinement of screening for sarcopenia with the use of SARC-F seems needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; EWGSOP2; SARC-F; Sarcopenia; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33506313     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01782-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  18 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life in sarcopenia and frailty.

Authors:  René Rizzoli; Jean-Yves Reginster; Jean-François Arnal; Ivan Bautmans; Charlotte Beaudart; Heike Bischoff-Ferrari; Emmanuel Biver; Steven Boonen; Maria-Luisa Brandi; Arkadi Chines; Cyrus Cooper; Sol Epstein; Roger A Fielding; Bret Goodpaster; John A Kanis; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andrea Laslop; Vincenzo Malafarina; Leocadio Rodriguez Mañas; Bruce H Mitlak; Richard O Oreffo; Jean Petermans; Kieran Reid; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Yannis Tsouderos; Marjolein Visser; Olivier Bruyère
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Verification of the predictive validity for mortality of the SARC-F questionnaire based on a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Satoshi Ida; Ryutaro Kaneko; Kanako Imataka; Kaoru Okubo; Yoshitaka Shirakura; Kentaro Azuma; Ryoko Fujiwara; Hiroka Takahashi; Kazuya Murata
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Sarcopenia in Korean Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 70 Years and Older: Application of Screening and Diagnostic Tools From the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 Update.

Authors:  Miji Kim; Chang Won Won
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults, an exploration of differences between studies and within definitions: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  A J Mayhew; K Amog; S Phillips; G Parise; P D McNicholas; R J de Souza; L Thabane; P Raina
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 5.  SARC-F for Screening of Sarcopenia Among Older Adults: A Meta-analysis of Screening Test Accuracy.

Authors:  Satoshi Ida; Ryutaro Kaneko; Kazuya Murata
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 6.  Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacob Pacifico; Milou A J Geerlings; Esmee M Reijnierse; Christina Phassouliotis; Wen Kwang Lim; Andrea B Maier
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 4.032

7.  Comparison of four sarcopenia screening tools in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Jing Lu; Jiaojiao Jiang; Yanli Zeng; Huairong Tang
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 8.  Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Eugène McCloskey; Olivier Bruyère; Matteo Cesari; Yves Rolland; René Rizzoli; Islène Araujo de Carvalho; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Ivan Bautmans; Marie-Claude Bertière; Maria Luisa Brandi; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Nansa Burlet; Etienne Cavalier; Francesca Cerreta; Antonio Cherubini; Roger Fielding; Evelien Gielen; Francesco Landi; Jean Petermans; Jean-Yves Reginster; Marjolein Visser; John Kanis; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.

Authors:  Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Gülistan Bahat; Jürgen Bauer; Yves Boirie; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Cyrus Cooper; Francesco Landi; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Stéphane M Schneider; Cornel C Sieber; Eva Topinkova; Maurits Vandewoude; Marjolein Visser; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 10.  Sarcopenia: A Time for Action. An SCWD Position Paper.

Authors:  Juergen Bauer; John E Morley; Annemie M W J Schols; Luigi Ferrucci; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Elsa Dent; Vickie E Baracos; Jeffrey A Crawford; Wolfram Doehner; Steven B Heymsfield; Aminah Jatoi; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Mitja Lainscak; Francesco Landi; Alessandro Laviano; Michelangelo Mancuso; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Carla M Prado; Florian Strasser; Stephan von Haehling; Andrew J S Coats; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  3 in total

1.  The usefulness of SARC-F.

Authors:  Karolina Piotrowicz; Barbara Gryglewska; Jerzy Gąsowski
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Comparative Analysis of Supervised Classifiers for the Evaluation of Sarcopenia Using a sEMG-Based Platform.

Authors:  Alessandro Leone; Gabriele Rescio; Andrea Manni; Pietro Siciliano; Andrea Caroppo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Polish Translation and Validation of the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) Questionnaire to Assess Nutritional and Non-Nutritional Risk Factors of Sarcopenia in Older Adults.

Authors:  Roma Krzymińska-Siemaszko; Ewa Deskur-Śmielecka; Arkadiusz Styszyński; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.