| Literature DB >> 33505929 |
Fatima Zohra Labbaci1, Farida Ouda Boukortt1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the green algae Ulva lactuca and its hydroethanolic extract on insulin resistance and cholesterol reverse transport in type 2 diabetic (T2D) rats. Rats had T2D induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) for 5 weeks followed by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin. Diabetic rats were divided into three groups and were fed a HFD in the presence or absence of 1% alga (HFD-Alg) or 1% of its hydroethanolic extract (HFD-Ext), for 4 weeks. The control group consumed 20% casein combined with 5% lipids. Hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia were noted in HFD rats vs control rats. Whole alga and its extract decreased these parameters vs the HFD. Moreover, fecal total cholesterol and triacylglycerols levels were lowered in HFD group vs C group, but were increased with HFD-Alg vs HFD. Compared with the Control, the HFD group had decreased lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activity, apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I), high-density lipoprotein (HDL3)-phospholipids (PL), and HDL2-cholesteryl ester (CE) levels, but increased HDL3-unesterified cholesterol (UC) levels. Furthermore, compared with the HFD group, the HFD-Alg and HFD-Ext groups had increased LCAT activity, ApoA-I, HDL3-PL, and HDL2-CE levels and decreased HDL3-UC levels. In addition, in the HFD-Ext group, LCAT activity and ApoA-1 levels were decreased vs the HFD-Alg whereas HDL3-UC levels were increased. In conclusion, these results indicate that U. lactuca and its hydroethanolic extract have curative effect on T2D. Therefore, this alga could be considered a functional food supplement for the treatment and prevention of diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Ulva lactuca; cholesterol acyltransferase; high-fat diet; hydroethanolic extract; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 33505929 PMCID: PMC7813591 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.4.353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Composition of the standard and experimental diets (unit: g/kg)
| Composition | Standard diet | Experimental diet | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HFD | HFD-Alg | HFD-Ext | |
| Energy content (kcal/100 g diet) | 381 | 506 | 502 | 502 |
| Casein[ | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Sucrose | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Corn starch | 590 | 340 | 330 | 330 |
| Cellulose[ | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Vitamin mix[ | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Mineral mix[ | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Lipids[ | 50 | − | − | − |
| Fat of the lamb | − | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Algae powder | − | − | 10 | − |
| Algae extract powder | − | − | − | 10 |
C, control; HFD, high-fat diet; HFD-Alg, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae; HFD-Ext, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae extract.
1)Prolabo.
2)UAR 200: vitamin mixture provides the following amounts (mg/kg diet): retinol, 12; cholecalciferol, 0.125; thiamine, 40; riboflavin, 30; pantothenic acid, 140; pyridoxine, 20; inositol, 300; cyanocobalamin, 0.1; ascorbic acid, 1,600; DL-α-tocopherol, 340; menadione, 80; nicotinic acid, 200; p-aminobenzoic acid, 100; folic acid, 10; biotin, 0.6.
3)UAR 205B: the salt mixture provides the following amounts (mg/kg diet): CaHPO4, 17,200; KCl, 4,000; NaCl, 400; MgO, 420; MgS4, 2,000; Fe2O3, 120; Fe2SO4·7H2O, 200; trace elements, 400; MnSO4·H2O, 98; CuSO4·5H2O, 20; ZnSO4, 80; CoSO4·7H2O, 0.16; KI, 0.32.
4)Lipid mixture provides the following amounts (g/kg diet): sunflower oil, 10; olive oil, 39; walnut oil, 1 (with n-6/n-3=7). Olive and sunflower oils from Cevital (Kouba, Algeria) and walnut oil from Cauvin (Saint Gilles, France).
Body weight and food intake
| C | HFD | HFD-Alg | HFD-Ext | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight after 4 weeks (g) | 340.32±23.31 | 243.53±14.05[ | 326.45±34.88[ | 265.54±42.87[ |
| Weight gain (g) | 48.10±24.42 | −64.90±13.90[ | 33.14±19.52[ | −68.50±19.80[ |
| Food intake (g/d/rat) | 24.21±0.62 | 17.20±0.50[ | 23.10±1.34[ | 22.04±0.53[ |
Values are mean±SEM of 6 rats per group.
Statistical analysis was performed using least significant difference test.
*HFD vs. C, #HFD vs. HFD-Alg, †HFD vs. HFD-Ext, and ‡HFD-Alg vs. HFD-Ext were considered significantly different at P<0.05.
C, control; HFD, high-fat diet; HFD-Alg, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae; HFD-Ext, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae extract.
Fig. 1Glycaemia evolution. Values are mean±SEM of 6 rats per group. Statistical analysis was performed using least significant difference test. *HFD vs. C, #HFD vs. HFD-Alg, †HFD vs. HFD-Ext, and ‡HFD-Alg vs. HFD-Ext were considered significantly different at P<0.05. C, control; HFD, high-fat diet; HFD-Alg, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae; HFD-Ext, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae extract.
Serum glucose, insulinemia, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-insulin resistance (IR), and HOMA-β cell function
| C | HFD | HFD-Alg | HFD-Ext | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum glucose (mM) | 4.82±1.54 | 24.18±1.64[ | 6.82±0.68[ | 9.59±0.88[ |
| Serum insulin (ng/mL) | 0.12±0.05 | 0.05±0.01[ | 0.14±0.04[ | 0.11±0.01 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.03±0.31 | 21.60±9.76[ | 6.96±0.85[ | 7.37±1.14[ |
| HOMA-IR | 2.59±0.03 | 8.67±0.20[ | 4.28±0.17[ | 5.73±0.31[ |
| HOMA-β | 1.81±0.10 | 0.04±0.03[ | 0.97±0.09[ | 0.37±0.09[ |
Values are mean±SEM of 6 rats per group.
Statistical analysis was performed using least significant difference test.
*HFD vs. C, #HFD vs. HFD-Alg, †HFD vs. HFD-Ext, and ‡HFD-Alg vs. HFD-Ext were considered significantly different at P<0.05.
C, control; HFD, high-fat diet; HFD-Alg, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae; HFD-Ext, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae extract.
Serum, liver and fecal lipid concentrations
| C | HFD | HFD-Alg | HFD-Ext | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | ||||
| TC (mmol/L) | 1.10±0.23 | 4.16±0.96[ | 1.66±0.66[ | 2.35±0.84[ |
| TAG (mmol/L) | 0.70±0.58 | 4.29±0.62[ | 0.89±0.36[ | 1.35±0.44[ |
| Liver | ||||
| TC (mmol/g liver) | 1.10±0.49 | 8.03±3.18[ | 1.17±0.14[ | 1.79±0.75[ |
| TAG (mmol/g) | 0.88±0.81 | 3.51±1.19[ | 1.61±0.46[ | 1.98±0.81[ |
| Feces | ||||
| Total lipids (mg/d per rat) | 67.50±5.00 | 36.00±5.77[ | 79.00±2.94[ | 69.00±2.31[ |
| TC (mg/d per rat) | 4.44±0.66 | 2.67±0.54[ | 3.05±1.32[ | 2.85±0.15[ |
Values are mean±SEM of 6 rats per group.
Statistical analysis was performed using least significant difference test.
*HFD vs. C, #HFD vs. HFD-Alg, †HFD vs. HFD-Ext, and ‡HFD-Alg vs. HFD-Ext were considered significantly different at P<0.05.
C, control; HFD, high-fat diet; HFD-Alg, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae; HFD-Ext, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae extract; TC, total cholesterol; TAG, triacylglycerol.
Serum lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activity, apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)3-phospholipids (PL), HDL3-unesterified cholesterol (UC), and HDL2-cholesteryl ester (CE) contents
| C | HFD | HFD-Alg | HFD-Ext | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCAT (nmol/mL/h) | 14.65±3.69 | 8.88±1.83[ | 12.87±2.79[ | 10.17±0.97[ |
| ApoA-1 (g/L) | 0.91±0.06 | 0.46±0.03[ | 0.76±0.08[ | 0.56±0.05[ |
| HDL3-PL (mM) | 0.42±0.04 | 0.30±0.03[ | 0.35±0.01 | 0.36±0.04 |
| HDL3-UC (mM) | 0.22±0.01 | 2.95±0.34[ | 1.10±0.36[ | 2.16±0.06[ |
| HDL2-CE (mM) | 3.14±0.45 | 0.10±0.03[ | 3.08±0.31[ | 2.11±0.30[ |
Values are mean±SEM of 6 rats per group.
Statistical analysis was performed using least significant difference test.
*HFD vs. C, #HFD vs. HFD-Alg, †HFD vs. HFD-Ext, and ‡HFD-Alg vs. HFD-Ext were considered significantly different at P<0.05.
C, control; HFD, high-fat diet; HFD-Alg, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae; HFD-Ext, high-fat diet supplemented with 1% algae extract.