Frank van Dijk1, Yohama Caraballo-Arias2. 1. Occupational Physician. Learning and Developing Occupational Health (LDOH) Foundation; emeritus professor in Occupational Health (The Netherlands). Leiden, Netherlands. 2. Occupational Physician. International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) Venezuelan National Secretary; Council of Scientific Advisors American College of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (ACOEM); Learning and Developing Occupational Health (LDOH) Foundation. Caracas, Venezuela.
Abstract
Background: Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) professionals must base their advice and interventions on evidence from science, in balance with their expertise, and with workers' and other stakeholders' values and preferences. Evidence-based professional practice is one of the remedies against misinformation creating confusion and distrust in the society. Objectives: To present, for OSH professionals, an overview and critical considerations about concepts, strategies, and tools needed for an accurate search for evidence-based information. Methods: Information sources have been collected and discussed as a base for a documented vision on knowledge questions, online information sources, search engines, databases, and tools. Results: Every search should start with a carefully phrased question. To help finding a reliable answer, potential evidence-based online sources are presented. Systematic reviews and original scientific articles are regarded as primary sources. Secondary and tertiary sources are discussed, such as practice guidelines, point-of-care summaries, advisory reports, quality websites or apps, Wikipedia, quality videos, and e-lessons. To find sources, adequate use of search engines and databases is required. Examples are discussed briefly, such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Virtual Health Library, NICE, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Work, Google (Scholar), and YouTube. Conclusions: Evidence-based practice in OSH must be stimulated, relying mainly on trusted online sources. The breadth of appropriate information sources is wider than described in most publications. Search engines facilitate the finding of quality reports, videos, e-courses, and websites. Such sources can be explored by well-trained professionals to complement the use of scientific articles, reviews, point-of-care summaries, and guidelines. Adequate use of online information sources requires awareness, motivation, and skills in professionals and educators. To date, the quality of skills in searching is low, thus a more adequate education is crucial. The quality of sources, search engines, and databases will be considered more thoroughly in another study. International collaboration is profitable and needs new drivers. Copyright:
Background: Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) professionals must base their advice and interventions on evidence from science, in balance with their expertise, and with workers' and other stakeholders' values and preferences. Evidence-based professional practice is one of the remedies against misinformation creating confusion and distrust in the society. Objectives: To present, for OSH professionals, an overview and critical considerations about concepts, strategies, and tools needed for an accurate search for evidence-based information. Methods: Information sources have been collected and discussed as a base for a documented vision on knowledge questions, online information sources, search engines, databases, and tools. Results: Every search should start with a carefully phrased question. To help finding a reliable answer, potential evidence-based online sources are presented. Systematic reviews and original scientific articles are regarded as primary sources. Secondary and tertiary sources are discussed, such as practice guidelines, point-of-care summaries, advisory reports, quality websites or apps, Wikipedia, quality videos, and e-lessons. To find sources, adequate use of search engines and databases is required. Examples are discussed briefly, such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Virtual Health Library, NICE, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Work, Google (Scholar), and YouTube. Conclusions: Evidence-based practice in OSH must be stimulated, relying mainly on trusted online sources. The breadth of appropriate information sources is wider than described in most publications. Search engines facilitate the finding of quality reports, videos, e-courses, and websites. Such sources can be explored by well-trained professionals to complement the use of scientific articles, reviews, point-of-care summaries, and guidelines. Adequate use of online information sources requires awareness, motivation, and skills in professionals and educators. To date, the quality of skills in searching is low, thus a more adequate education is crucial. The quality of sources, search engines, and databases will be considered more thoroughly in another study. International collaboration is profitable and needs new drivers. Copyright:
Authors: Stefano Mattioli; Andrea Farioli; Robin M T Cooke; Alberto Baldasseroni; Jani Ruotsalainen; Donatella Placidi; Stefania Curti; Gianpiero Mancini; Mauro Fierro; Giuseppe Campo; Francesca Zanardi; Francesco S Violante Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Margot C W Joosen; Evelien P M Brouwers; Karlijn M van Beurden; Berend Terluin; Jani H Ruotsalainen; Jong-Min Woo; Kyeong-Sook Choi; Hisashi Eguchi; Jiro Moriguchi; Jac J L van der Klink; Jaap van Weeghel Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Frederieke Schaafsma; Nathalie Hugenholtz; Angela de Boer; Paul Smits; Carel Hulshof; Frank van Dijk Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Jennifer Yost; Maureen Dobbins; Robyn Traynor; Kara DeCorby; Stephanie Workentine; Lori Greco Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 3.295