Literature DB >> 33504851

Standard reference values of the upper body posture in healthy middle-aged female adults in Germany.

Daniela Ohlendorf1, Polyna Sosnov2, Julia Keller2, Eileen M Wanke2, Gerhard Oremek2, Hanns Ackermann3, David A Groneberg2.   

Abstract

In order to classify and analyze the parameters of upper body posture, a baseline in form of standard values is demanded. To this date, standard values have only been published for healthy young women. Data for female adults between 51 and 60 years are lacking. 101 symptom-free female volunteers aged 51-60 (55.16 ± 2.89) years. The mean height of the volunteers was 1.66 ± 0.62 m, with a mean body weight of 69.3 ± 11.88 kg and an average BMI of 25.02 ± 4.55 kg/m2. By means of video raster stereography, a 3D-scan of the upper back surface was measured in a habitual standing position. The confidence interval, tolerance range and ICCs were calculated for all parameters. The habitual standing position is almost symmetrical in the frontal plane the most prominent deviation being a slightly more ventral position of the left shoulder blade in comparison to the right. The upper body (spine position) is inclined ventrally with a minor tilt to the left. In the sagittal plane, the kyphosis angle of the thoracic spine is greater than the lordosis angle of the lumbar spine. The pelvis is virtually evenly balanced with deviations from an ideal position falling under the measurement error margin of 1 mm/1°. There were also BMI influenced postural variations in the sagittal plane and shoulder distance. The ICCs are calculated from three repeated measurements and all parameters can be classified as "almost perfect". Deflections from an ideally symmetric spinal alignment in women aged 51-60 years are small-scaled, with a minimal frontal-left inclination and accentuated sigmoidal shape of the spine. Postural parameters presented in this survey allow for comparisons with other studies as well as the evaluation of clinical diagnostics and applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33504851      PMCID: PMC7840933          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81879-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  44 in total

1.  Impact of magnitude and percentage of global sagittal plane correction on health-related quality of life at 2-years follow-up.

Authors:  Benjamin Blondel; Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Justin Smith; Keith Bridwell; Steven Glassman; Christopher Shaffrey; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Economic and social implications of aging societies.

Authors:  Sarah Harper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Classification and characterization of postural transitions using instrumented shoes.

Authors:  Christopher Moufawad El Achkar; Constanze Lenbole-Hoskovec; Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu; Kristof Major; Christophe Büla; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Association of spinal inclination with physical performance measures among community-dwelling Japanese women aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  Yasuyo Abe; Kiyoshi Aoyagi; Tadao Tsurumoto; Chih-Yu Chen; Mitsuo Kanagae; Satoshi Mizukami; Zhaojia Ye; Yosuke Kusano
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.730

5.  The injury mechanisms of osteoporotic upper extremity fractures among older adults: a controlled study of 287 consecutive patients and their 108 controls.

Authors:  M Palvanen; P Kannus; J Parkkari; T Pitkäjärvi; M Pasanen; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Differences in thoracic kyphosis and in back muscle strength in women with bone loss due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anna Mika; Viswanath B Unnithan; Piotr Mika
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Influence of spinal sagittal alignment, body balance, muscle strength, and physical ability on falling of middle-aged and elderly males.

Authors:  Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Norimitsu Wakao; Taisuke Seki; Kenichi Hirano; Akio Muramoto; Yoshihito Sakai; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Naoki Ishiguro; Yukiharu Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  [Demographic change: Changes in society and medicine and developmental trends in geriatrics].

Authors:  G F Kolb; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

View more
  2 in total

1.  Standard reference values of the upper body posture in healthy male adults aged between 31 and 40 years in Germany-an observational study.

Authors:  Daniela Ohlendorf; Ugur Kaya; Julian Goecke; Gerhard Oremek; Hanns Ackermann; David A Groneberg
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Standard reference values of the upper body posture in healthy male adults aged between 51 and 60 years in Germany.

Authors:  Daniela Ohlendorf; Dominik Krüger; Wolfgang Christian; Hanns Ackermann; Fee Keil; Gerhard Oremek; Christian Maurer-Grubinger; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.