Literature DB >> 23443680

Influence of spinal sagittal alignment, body balance, muscle strength, and physical ability on falling of middle-aged and elderly males.

Shiro Imagama1, Zenya Ito, Norimitsu Wakao, Taisuke Seki, Kenichi Hirano, Akio Muramoto, Yoshihito Sakai, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Nobuyuki Hamajima, Naoki Ishiguro, Yukiharu Hasegawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for falling in elderly people remain uncertain, and the effects of spinal factors and physical ability on body balance and falling have not been examined. The objective of this study was to investigate how factors such as spinal sagittal alignment, spinal range of motion, body balance, muscle strength, and gait speed influence falling in the prospective cohort study.
METHODS: The subjects were 100 males who underwent a basic health checkup. Balance, SpinalMouse(®) data, grip strength, back muscle strength, 10-m gait time, lumbar lateral standing radiographs, body mass index, and fall history over the previous year were examined. Platform measurements of balance included the distance of movement of the center of pressure (COP) per second (LNG/TIME), the envelopment area traced by movement of the COP (E AREA), and the LNG/E AREA ratio. The thoracic/lumbar angle ratio (T/L ratio) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were used as an index of sagittal balance.
RESULTS: LNG/TIME and E AREA showed significant positive correlations with age, T/L ratio, SVA, and 10-m gait time; and significant negative correlations with lumbar lordosis angle, sacral inclination angle, grip strength and back muscle strength. Multiple regression analysis showed significant differences for LNG/TIME and E AREA with T/L ratio, SVA, lumbar lordosis angle and sacral inclination angle (R (2) = 0.399). Twelve subjects (12 %) had experienced a fall over the past year. Age, T/L ratio, SVA, lumbar lordosis angle, sacral inclination angle, grip strength, back muscle strength, 10-m gait time, height of the intervertebral disc, osteophyte formation in radiographs and LNG/E AREA differed significantly between fallers and non-fallers. The group with SVA > 40 mm (n = 18) had a significant higher number of subjects with a single fall (6 single fallers/18: p = 0.0075) and with multiple falls (4 multiple fallers/18: p = 0.0095).
CONCLUSION: Good spinal sagittal alignment, muscle strength and 10-m gait speed improve body balance and reduce the risk of fall. Muscle strength and physical ability are also important for spinal sagittal alignment. Body balance training, improvement of physical abilities including muscle training, and maintenance of spinal sagittal alignment can lead to prevention of fall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23443680      PMCID: PMC3676567          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2721-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  43 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device.

Authors:  R B Post; V J M Leferink
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; M Speechley; S F Ginter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population.

Authors:  B E Maki; P J Holliday; A K Topper
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-03

5.  The role of the labyrinth in standing posture regulation.

Authors:  T Tokita; M Maeda; H Miyata
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers.

Authors:  I Melzer; N Benjuya; J Kaplanski
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  The cost and frequency of hospitalization for fall-related injuries in older adults.

Authors:  B H Alexander; F P Rivara; M E Wolf
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Fall incidence in frail older women after individualized visual feedback-based balance training.

Authors:  Sanna Sihvonen; Sarianna Sipilä; Sara Taskinen; Pertti Era
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.140

9.  Changes in postural balance in frail elderly women during a 4-week visual feedback training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sanna E Sihvonen; Sarianna Sipilä; Pertti A Era
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.140

10.  Influence of sagittal balance and physical ability associated with exercise on quality of life in middle-aged and elderly people.

Authors:  Shiro Imagama; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Yoshihito Sakai; Zenya Ito; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  39 in total

1.  Stand-up test predicts occurrence of non-traumatic vertebral fracture in outpatient women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ryoma Asahi; Yutaka Nakamura; Masayoshi Kanai; Kento Watanabe; Satoshi Yuguchi; Tomohiko Kamo; Masato Azami; Hirofumi Ogihara; Satoshi Asano
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Comparison of spinal alignment, muscular strength, and quality of life between women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; D Kudo; M Hongo; Y Kasukawa; Y Ishikawa; Y Shimada
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Association with sagittal alignment and osteoporosis-related fractures in outpatient women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Asahi; Y Nakamura; M Kanai; K Watanabe; S Yuguchi; T Kamo; M Azami; H Ogihara; S Asano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Detection of cognitive decline by spinal posture assessment in health exams of the general older population.

Authors:  Hikaru Nishimura; Shota Ikegami; Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Ryosuke Tokida; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Normal variation in sagittal spinal alignment parameters in adult patients: an EOS study using serial imaging.

Authors:  Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Kian Loong Melvin Tan; Vikaesh Moorthy; Eugene Tze-Chun Lau; Leok-Lim Lau; Gabriel Liu; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  The Role of Trunk Musculature in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Implications for Prediction, Prevention, and Management.

Authors:  Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Relationship of the sacral slope with early gait derangements in robust older women.

Authors:  Leda Magalhaes Oliveira; Suely Roizenblatt; Flavio Duarte Silva; Arnaldo Roizenblatt; Artur Rocha Correa Fernandes; Vera Lucia Szejnfeld
Journal:  Adv Rheumatol       Date:  2021-06-12

8.  Correlates of bone mineral density and sagittal spinal balance in the aged.

Authors:  Yung Cho; Gangpyo Lee; Jhoan Aguinaldo; Kun-Jai Lee; Keewon Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-02-28

9.  Diagnostic Power of Circulatory Metabolic Biomarkers as Metabolic Syndrome Risk Predictors in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Northwest of England (A Feasibility Study).

Authors:  Razieh Hassannejad; Hamsa Sharrouf; Fahimeh Haghighatdoost; Ben Kirk; Farzad Amirabdollahian
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease and Fall Risk in Older Adults: Results From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Natalie Daya; Lawrence J Appel; Edgar R Miller; Kunihiro Matsushita; Erin D Michos; B Gwen Windham; Christie M Ballantyne; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 7.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.