Ricardo Cordeiro1,2, Pedro Augusto Mira3,4, Walace Monteiro1,2, Felipe Cunha2, Mateus C Laterza4, Linda S Pescatello5, Daniel G Martinez4, Paulo Farinatti1,2. 1. Programa de Graduacao em Ciencias da Atividade Fisica, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Niteroi, RJ, BR. 2. Laboratorio de Atividade Fisica e Promocao da Saude (LABSAU), Instituto de Educacao Fisica e Desportos, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR. 3. Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Laboratorio de Ciencia do Exercicio, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, RJ, BR. 4. Unidade de Investigacao Cardiovascular e Fisiologia do Exercicio, Hospital Universitario e Faculdade de Educacao Fisica e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BR. 5. Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, CT, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated whether post-exercise hypotension (PEH) after concurrent exercise (CEX) is related to changes in cardiac output (Q) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in older individuals. We tested whether PEH after a single bout of CEX circuits performed in open-access facilities at the Third Age Academies (TAA) in Rio de Janeiro City (Brazil) would be concomitant with decreased Q and SVR in individuals aged ≥60 years with prehypertension. Moreover, we assessed autonomic modulation as a potential mechanism underlying PEH. METHODS: Fourteen individuals (age, 65.8±0.9 y; systolic/diastolic blood pressure [SBP/DBP], 132.4±12.1/72.8±10.8 mmHg; with half of the patients taking antihypertensive medications) had their blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), Q, SVR, HR variability (HRV), and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) recorded before and 50 min after CEX (40-min circuit, including seven stations of alternate aerobic/resistance exercises at 60-70% HR reserve) and non-exercise control (CONT) sessions. The study protocol was registered in a World Health Organization-accredited office (Trial registration RBR-7BWVPJ). RESULTS: SBP (Δ=-14.2±13.1 mmHg, p=0.0001), DBP (Δ=-5.2±8.2 mmHg, p= 0.04), Q (Δ=-2.2±1.5 L/min, p=0.0001), and BRS (Δ=-3.5±2.6 ms/mmHg; p=0.05) decreased after CEX as compared with the CONT session. By contrast, the HR increased (Δ=9.4±7.2 bpm, p<0.0001), and SVR remained stable throughout the postexercise period as compared with the CONT session (Δ=0.10±0.22 AU, p=0.14). We found no significant difference between the CEX and CONT with respect to the HRV indexes reflecting autonomic modulation. CONCLUSION: CEX induced PEH in the older individuals with prehypertension status. At least in the first 50 min, PEH occurred parallel to the decreased Q and increased HR, while SVR was not different. The changes in autonomic outflow appeared to be unrelated to the acute cardiac and hemodynamic responses.
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated whether post-exercise hypotension (PEH) after concurrent exercise (CEX) is related to changes in cardiac output (Q) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in older individuals. We tested whether PEH after a single bout of CEX circuits performed in open-access facilities at the Third Age Academies (TAA) in Rio de Janeiro City (Brazil) would be concomitant with decreased Q and SVR in individuals aged ≥60 years with prehypertension. Moreover, we assessed autonomic modulation as a potential mechanism underlying PEH. METHODS: Fourteen individuals (age, 65.8±0.9 y; systolic/diastolic blood pressure [SBP/DBP], 132.4±12.1/72.8±10.8 mmHg; with half of the patients taking antihypertensive medications) had their blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), Q, SVR, HR variability (HRV), and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) recorded before and 50 min after CEX (40-min circuit, including seven stations of alternate aerobic/resistance exercises at 60-70% HR reserve) and non-exercise control (CONT) sessions. The study protocol was registered in a World Health Organization-accredited office (Trial registration RBR-7BWVPJ). RESULTS: SBP (Δ=-14.2±13.1 mmHg, p=0.0001), DBP (Δ=-5.2±8.2 mmHg, p= 0.04), Q (Δ=-2.2±1.5 L/min, p=0.0001), and BRS (Δ=-3.5±2.6 ms/mmHg; p=0.05) decreased after CEX as compared with the CONT session. By contrast, the HR increased (Δ=9.4±7.2 bpm, p<0.0001), and SVR remained stable throughout the postexercise period as compared with the CONT session (Δ=0.10±0.22 AU, p=0.14). We found no significant difference between the CEX and CONT with respect to the HRV indexes reflecting autonomic modulation. CONCLUSION: CEX induced PEH in the older individuals with prehypertension status. At least in the first 50 min, PEH occurred parallel to the decreased Q and increased HR, while SVR was not different. The changes in autonomic outflow appeared to be unrelated to the acute cardiac and hemodynamic responses.
Authors: Maria Urbana P Brandão Rondon; Maria Janieire N N Alves; Ana Maria F W Braga; Odila Tomoko U N Teixeira; Antonio Carlos P Barretto; Eduardo M Krieger; Carlos Eduardo Negrão Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-02-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Patrick Liu; Gregory A Roth; Marie Ng; Stan Biryukov; Laurie Marczak; Lily Alexander; Kara Estep; Kalkidan Hassen Abate; Tomi F Akinyemiju; Raghib Ali; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Peter Azzopardi; Amitava Banerjee; Till Bärnighausen; Arindam Basu; Tolesa Bekele; Derrick A Bennett; Sibhatu Biadgilign; Ferrán Catalá-López; Valery L Feigin; Joao C Fernandes; Florian Fischer; Alemseged Aregay Gebru; Philimon Gona; Rajeev Gupta; Graeme J Hankey; Jost B Jonas; Suzanne E Judd; Young-Ho Khang; Ardeshir Khosravi; Yun Jin Kim; Ruth W Kimokoti; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Dhaval Kolte; Alan Lopez; Paulo A Lotufo; Reza Malekzadeh; Yohannes Adama Melaku; George A Mensah; Awoke Misganaw; Ali H Mokdad; Andrew E Moran; Haseeb Nawaz; Bruce Neal; Frida Namnyak Ngalesoni; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Farshad Pourmalek; Anwar Rafay; Rajesh Kumar Rai; David Rojas-Rueda; Uchechukwu K Sampson; Itamar S Santos; Monika Sawhney; Aletta E Schutte; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Girma Temam Shifa; Ivy Shiue; Bemnet Amare Tedla; Amanda G Thrift; Marcello Tonelli; Thomas Truelsen; Nikolaos Tsilimparis; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Olalekan A Uthman; Tommi Vasankari; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Theo Vos; Ronny Westerman; Lijing L Yan; Yuichiro Yano; Naohiro Yonemoto; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Christopher J L Murray Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eduardo S Dos Santos; Ricardo Y Asano; Irênio G Filho; Nilson L Lopes; Paulo Panelli; Dahan da C Nascimento; Scott R Collier; Jonato Prestes Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Lauren M L Corso; Hayley V Macdonald; Blair T Johnson; Paulo Farinatti; Jill Livingston; Amanda L Zaleski; Adam Blanchard; Linda S Pescatello Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411