Literature DB >> 28402021

Validation of non-invasive haemodynamic methods in patients with liver disease: the Finometer and the Task Force Monitor.

Jane M Brittain1, Troels M Busk1,2, Søren Møller1.   

Abstract

Patients with advanced cirrhosis often present a hyperdynamic circulation characterized by a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), and an increase in heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO). Accurate assessment of the altered circulation can be performed invasively; however, due to the disadvantages of this approach, non-invasive methods are warranted. The purpose of this study was to compare continuous non-invasive measurements of haemodynamic variables by the Finometer and the Task Force Monitor with simultaneous invasive measurements. In 25 patients with cirrhosis, SBP, DBP and HR were measured non-invasively and by femoral artery catheterization. CO was measured non-invasively and by indicator dilution technique. The non-invasive pressure monitoring was considered acceptable with a bias (accuracy) and a SD (precision) not exceeding 5 and 8 mmHg, respectively, as recommended by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. The accuracy and precision of the Finometer and the Task Force Monitor were as follows: SBP: -3·6 ± 17·9 and -8·9 ± 17·5 mmHg, respectively; DBP: 4·2 ± 9·6 and 1·9 ± 8·6 mmHg, respectively; HR: 2·0 ± 6·9 and 2·2 ± 6·2 bpm, respectively; and CO: 0·1 ± 1·6 and -1·0 ± 2·0 L min-1 , respectively. The study demonstrates that the overall performances of the Finometer and the Task Force Monitor in estimating absolute values of SBP, DBP, HR and CO in patients with cirrhosis are not equivalent to the gold standard, but may have an acceptable performance with repeated measurements.
© 2017 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; blood pressure monitors; cardiac output; cirrhosis; heart rate; indicator dilution technique; peripheral arterial catheterization; radioisotope dilution technique

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28402021     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  4 in total

1.  Baroreflex function, haemodynamic responses to an orthostatic challenge, and falls in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Tobia Zanotto; Thomas H Mercer; Marietta L van der Linden; Jamie P Traynor; Colin J Petrie; Arthur Doyle; Karen Chalmers; Nicola Allan; Jonathan Price; Hadi Oun; Ilona Shilliday; Pelagia Koufaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Hemodynamics and cardiac autonomic modulation after an acute concurrent exercise circuit in older individuals with pre- to established hypertension.

Authors:  Ricardo Cordeiro; Pedro Augusto Mira; Walace Monteiro; Felipe Cunha; Mateus C Laterza; Linda S Pescatello; Daniel G Martinez; Paulo Farinatti
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Comparison of the sit-up test and head-up tilt test for assessing blood pressure and hemodynamic responses in healthy young individuals.

Authors:  Kazuaki Oyake; Jun Murayama; Takaki Tateishi; Ayumi Mochida; Mao Matsumoto; Masahiro Tsujikawa; Kunitsugu Kondo; Yohei Otaka; Kimito Momose
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  More accurate systolic blood pressure measurement is required for improved hypertension management: a perspective.

Authors:  Meir Nitzan; Itzchak Slotki; Linda Shavit
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-07-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.