Manuel Hertzog1, Battulga Munkhbat2, Denis Baranov2, Timur Shegai2, Karl Börjesson1. 1. Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Kemigården 4, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden. 2. Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
Vibrational strong coupling is emerging as a promising tool to modify molecular properties by making use of hybrid light-matter states known as polaritons. Fabry-Perot cavities filled with organic molecules are typically used, and the molecular concentration limits the maximum reachable coupling strength. Developing methods to increase the coupling strength beyond the molecular concentration limit are highly desirable. In this Letter, we investigate the effect of adding a gold nanorod array into a cavity containing pure organic molecules using FT-IR microscopy and numerical modeling. Incorporation of the plasmonic nanorod array that acts as artificial molecules leads to an order of magnitude increase in the total coupling strength for the cavity with matching resonant frequency filled with organic molecules. Additionally, we observe a significant narrowing of the plasmon line width inside the cavity. We anticipate that these results will be a step forward in exploring vibropolaritonic chemistry and may be used in plasmon based biosensors.
Vibrational strong coupling is emerging as a promising tool to modify molecular properties by making use of hybrid light-matter states known as polaritons. Fabry-Perot cavities filled with organic molecules are typically used, and the molecular concentration limits the maximum reachable coupling strength. Developing methods to increase the coupling strength beyond the molecular concentration limit are highly desirable. In this Letter, we investigate the effect of adding a gold nanorod array into a cavity containing pure organic molecules using FT-IR microscopy and numerical modeling. Incorporation of the plasmonic nanorod array that acts as artificial molecules leads to an order of magnitude increase in the total coupling strength for the cavity with matching resonant frequency filled with organic molecules. Additionally, we observe a significant narrowing of the plasmon line width inside the cavity. We anticipate that these results will be a step forward in exploring vibropolaritonic chemistry and may be used in plasmon based biosensors.
Strong light–matter
coupling has attracted considerable
attention in the past couple of years due to the potential applications
it offers in physical and chemical sciences.[1−4] For example, strong coupling of
organic molecules has been shown to modify the rate of a photoisomerization
reaction,[5,6] increase electronic transport,[7] and expand the length scale of Förster
energy transfer.[8−10] Not to mention other effects of strong coupling such
as selective manipulation of excited states,[11] suppression of photo-oxidation,[12] or
reducing photodegradation in polymers.[13] Recently, vibrational strong coupling has come into focus as a promising
physical tool to control molecular properties. Since the first experimental
evidence of vibrational strong coupling (VSC) in both solid[14−16] and liquid states,[17] the field has expanded
considerably[18−25] and it has been shown to alter reaction kinetics,[26−29] control reaction selectivity,[30] allow for intermolecular energy transfer,[31] and modification of enzyme activity.[32] Recent progress in chemical reactions making
use of polaritons was summarized by Hirai et al.[33] In order to significantly impact chemical reactivity, theoretical
investigations have demonstrated that a high coupling strength is
required[34,35] and a recent experimental study has shown
a nonlinear relationship between the coupling strength and thermodynamics
of a chemical reaction.[29]Strong
light–matter coupling is achieved by interfacing
molecules with confined electromagnetic field of resonant cavities
tuned to a molecular transition. When a molecular vibrational transition
is in the strong coupling regime, two new hybrid states, known as
polaritons, are formed,[36] separated in
energy by the so-called Rabi splitting ℏΩR. Traditionally, polaritons have been engineered with the
use of planar cavities, such as Fabry–Perot (FP) resonators
confining the electromagnetic fields between two mirrors.[14] Reaching large coupling strengths usually requires
saturating the cavity volume with the molecular material, and additionally
aligning the transition dipole moments with the cavity vacuum field.[37−39]Plasmonics offers an alternative route to strong coupling
by confining
light down to subwavelength scales with the use of metallic nanoparticles
and nanocavities.[40−42] Only a tight region of space around the metallic
cavity needs to be filled with molecules in order to form polaritons.[43] Plasmon resonances of nanoparticles are tunable
from the UV to the IR range and can be used for molecular sensing
in the IR range due to nanoscale mode volumes.[44−47] However, to improve the sensitivity,
new approaches for narrowing the plasmon line width are desirable.The magnitude of the Rabi splitting for a given molecular transition
is proportional to the square root of the molecular concentration
and the filling factor. Furthermore, the maximal achievable magnitude
of the Rabi splitting in the case of saturated mode volume is ultimately
bound by the bulk Rabi splitting (with f being the transition
oscillator strength[48]), which is independent
of the cavity type.[49−51] Therefore, new approaches are required to increase
the Rabi splitting in order to maximize the effect of the confined
electromagnetic field onto molecules, as shown by theoretical studies.[34,52,53]In this Letter, we utilize
a hierarchical coupling between a Fabry–Perot
cavity, a vibrational absorption band of an organic molecule, and
a localized surface plasmon resonance in the mid-IR regime to go beyond
the Rabi splitting imposed by the maximal concentration limit.[54] First, we show that the coupling of the plasmon
and the FP cavity results in an order of magnitude decrease in the
plasmon’s line width which is an observation rationalized by
reduced radiative losses from the plasmon in the cavity.[55] Then, by using numerical and analytical modeling
in conjunction to our experimental data, we show a 5–9-fold
increase in the total coupling strength, indicating that the plasmon
acts as an artificial molecule that increases the molecular coupling
strength.
Results and Discussions
In this study, we report a
method to increase the coupling strength
above the limit of using
a hybrid system composed of a Fabry–Perot
(FP) cavity, an organic molecule, and a localized surface plasmon
in a fashion similar to the one introduced by Bisht et al.[54] using two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides
in the visible regime. All three entities are tuned to the same resonance
frequency, thereby coupled amidst themselves, creating hybrid polaritons
(Figure a). The Fabry–Perot
cavities used in the following experiments are composed of IR-transparent
substrates (CaF2 and ZnSe) coated with 10 nm of
gold (Figure b; see SI for experimental methods). The physical distance
between the gold mirrors, ranging from 11 to 16 μm, was
controlled using a polymer spacer. The cavities were designed with
two inlets to inject liquids. The quality factor of an empty cavity
was 28, and the free spectral range was 496 cm–1 (Figure a). We choose
hexanal and 4-butylbenzonitrile as the organic molecules for this
study (Figure c).
Both are liquids at room temperature and were processed in neat form.
The molecular vibrations of interest are the C=O stretching
mode of hexanal and the C≡N stretching mode of 4-butylbenzonitrile.
These are strong absorption bands centered around 1724 and 2225 cm–1 with full width at half maxima (fwhm) of 27 and 10 cm–1, respectively (Figure b,c). The surface plasmon was provided by gold nanorod
arrays (size about 100 μm2), which were deposited
on top a spacer composed of 450 nm of SiO2 to minimize
interference from the gold mirror (Figure b). Five different arrays were made with
all having equal thickness and spacing but with lengths ranging from
1100 to 1500 nm, which gave plasmon resonances covering the
energy of both two molecular vibrations and the Fabry–Perot
mode (Figure d). The
plasmon resonances were broad (fwhm = 621–1120 cm–1) due to radiative losses. This is an intrinsic feature of plasmon
arrays in the mid-IR, hampering its use.
Figure 1
(a) Conceptual diagram
of the system in this study. (b) Schematic
view of the Fabry–Perot cavity. Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy microscopy was used to either probe the small area where
gold nanorods were deposited (beam 1) or where no rods were present
(beam 2). (c) Molecular structure of 4-butylbenzonitrile (top) and
hexanal (bottom). Highlighted in orange are the functional groups
responsible for the vibrational band coupled to the FP cavity. (d)
SEM picture of the gold nanorods deposited on a glass substrate.
Figure 2
(a) Transmission spectrum of an empty Fabry–Perot
cavity.
(b) ATR spectrum of hexanal (purple) showing the C=O absorption
band around 1724 cm–1, and transmission spectrum
of the FP cavity filled with hexanal (orange). The value of ℏΩR is 101 cm–1. (c) ATR spectrum of 4-butylbenzonitrile (purple) showing the C≡N
absorption band around 2225 cm–1, and transmission
spectrum of the FP cavity filled with 4-butylbenzonitrile (orange).
The value of ℏΩR is 46 cm–1. (d) Reflection map of the five different gold nanorod
arrays.
(a) Conceptual diagram
of the system in this study. (b) Schematic
view of the Fabry–Perot cavity. Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy microscopy was used to either probe the small area where
gold nanorods were deposited (beam 1) or where no rods were present
(beam 2). (c) Molecular structure of 4-butylbenzonitrile (top) and
hexanal (bottom). Highlighted in orange are the functional groups
responsible for the vibrational band coupled to the FP cavity. (d)
SEM picture of the gold nanorods deposited on a glass substrate.(a) Transmission spectrum of an empty Fabry–Perot
cavity.
(b) ATR spectrum of hexanal (purple) showing the C=O absorption
band around 1724 cm–1, and transmission spectrum
of the FP cavity filled with hexanal (orange). The value of ℏΩR is 101 cm–1. (c) ATR spectrum of 4-butylbenzonitrile (purple) showing the C≡N
absorption band around 2225 cm–1, and transmission
spectrum of the FP cavity filled with 4-butylbenzonitrile (orange).
The value of ℏΩR is 46 cm–1. (d) Reflection map of the five different gold nanorod
arrays.We will first describe the coupling
between the cavity and the
two organic compounds, then the cavity and plasmonic nanorods, and
finally the complete coupled system with the FP cavity, the plasmonic
nanorods, and the organic molecules. Figure b,c shows a clear normal mode splitting of
the vibrational absorption band of the two molecules when placed inside
the FP cavity at resonant conditions. This indicates strong coupling
between the cavity mode and the carbonyl group of hexanal (Figure b) as well as the
cavity mode and the nitrile group of 4-butylbenzonitrile (Figure c). The resulting
formation of vibro-polaritons gives a measured Rabi splitting of 101
and 46 cm–1 for the C=O mode and the
C≡N mode with the cavity, respectively. The Rabi splittings
are larger than both the fwhm of the bare molecular vibrations and
the cavity mode, which constitutes further evidence that our system
is indeed in the strong-coupling regime. Furthermore, the ratio between
the coupling strength and the bare transition energy of the vibrations
are 2.93% for the C=O band and 1.03% for the C≡N band.Let us now consider the plasmonic arrays inside the FP cavity.
With increasing rod length, the plasmon resonance shifts to lower
energies (Figure d),
and the nanorod length therefore provides a way of controlling the
cavity–plasmon detuning. Moreover, due to intrinsic anisotropy
of the rods the microcavity–plasmon polaritons are observed
only along the long axis of the rods, whereas along the short axis
the bare cavity is recovered. This polariton anisotropy can be probed
using polarization-resolved transmission spectroscopy. As shown in Figure a, the two original
FP cavity modes that can be observed in the given spectral range couple
to the plasmonic array mode, forming exactly 2 + 1 = 3 microcavity–plasmon
polaritonic states, denoted with dot-dashed lines. These new modes
exhibit almost linear dispersive behavior because of the underlying
dispersion of the plasmonic mode with the nanorod length.
Figure 3
(a–c)
Transmission maps of the gold rods inside the Fabry–Perot
cavity, containing air, hexanal, or 4-butylbenzonitrile, respectively.
All three were measured with a polarizer along the long axis of the
rods. The blue dash-dot lines highlight the newly formed polaritonic
states, the residual vertical modes are artifact due to nonideal polarization
alignment. (d–f) Simulated spectra of the same systems (with
the cavity thicknesses of 10.8, 8.5, and 10.4 μm, respectively).
The gray dashed line indicates the absorption band of interest of
the molecules, and the gray dots indicate the plasmon absorption maximum.
(a–c)
Transmission maps of the gold rods inside the Fabry–Perot
cavity, containing air, hexanal, or 4-butylbenzonitrile, respectively.
All three were measured with a polarizer along the long axis of the
rods. The blue dash-dot lines highlight the newly formed polaritonic
states, the residual vertical modes are artifact due to nonideal polarization
alignment. (d–f) Simulated spectra of the same systems (with
the cavity thicknesses of 10.8, 8.5, and 10.4 μm, respectively).
The gray dashed line indicates the absorption band of interest of
the molecules, and the gray dots indicate the plasmon absorption maximum.Furthermore, we observe an order of magnitude decrease
in the line
width of the resulting polariton compared to the bare plasmon. Similar
narrowing was observed in our previous experiments with plasmonic
arrays ultrastrongly coupled with FP cavities in the visible to mid-IR
range.[55] The line width of closely packed
metallic nanorods in the IR region is dominated by radiative losses;
however, when placed inside a closed cavity the radiation from the
nanorods does not instantaneously leave the cavity, instead bouncing
between the mirrors and thus reducing the total resonance line width.
Consequently, the fwhm of the plasmon polaritons drops to about 70 cm–1 for all of the rods’ lengths, as a result
of significantly suppressed radiative damping. Observing that the
fwhm of the FP modes are 84 ± 7.3 cm–1, the
line width of the cavity is the main limitation of the line width
of the plasmon polariton (Table S2).By adding molecules into the cavity, a third resonant component
is introduced to the hybrid system. The hexanalC=O band is
on resonance with the longest nanorods (Figure b), whereas the 4-butylbenzonitrileC≡N
band is on resonance with the shortest nanorods (Figure c). This time, more FP modes
are present in the same spectral range due to the larger background
refractive index of the molecular solution compared to air. Dot-dashed
lines indicate the dispersions of the resulting cavity–plasmon–molecule
polaritonic modes, whereas the dashed vertical lines indicate the
respective molecular resonances. In the next section, we will uncover
the polaritonic origin of these linearly dispersing modes with the
use of the analytical Hamiltonian formalism. Furthermore, the polaritonic
line widths are again reduced by the cavity mirrors, showing that
the FP cavity mode limits the polariton line width irrespectively
of the medium inside the cavity.In order to gain further understanding
of the experimental results,
we performed numerical modeling of the coupled systems with the use
of the finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method in a commercial
software (Lumerical Figure d–f and Figures S1–3). Simulated normal-incidence transmission spectra demonstrate a
good agreement with the experimental spectra for both plasmonic structures
and composite plasmon–molecule ones. Specifically, the observed
polaritonic modes linearly disperse with the rod’s length,
however, the dispersion is less pronounced than for uncoupled rods
(gray dots). This is a consequence of intermixing between highly dispersive
plasmonic modes and nondispersive FP modes (all arrays were placed
in the same FP cavity).Generally, a system of N distinct oscillators
produces N polaritonic modes upon coupling (as long
as the system is not exactly at an exceptional point). In our case,
we start with M bare cavity modes, the plasmonic
array mode, and the molecular resonance so that one could expect emergence
of M + 2 new eigenstates. However, the simulated
spectra strongly suggest that the molecules and the plasmons join
in a single effective oscillator, which adds only one additional polaritonic
mode to the system, as one can clearly see from the transmission dispersions
in Figure (aside
from the parasitic uncoupled FP modes). This confirms that even a
system with slightly detuned plasmons and molecules does behave as
a system with a single additional compound plasmonic–molecular
oscillator.Next, to ensure that the observed dispersions are
a result of the
interaction between the three components in the hybrid system, transmission
spectra of the system with a polarizer perpendicular to the nanorods’
long axis were measured. The results are shown in Figure S5 (numerical modeling in Figure S1). As expected, when the contribution of the plasmonic array
is removed by the polarizer, the transmission spectra are the same
as when probing the system beside the array (Figure b,c). Likewise, the values of ℏΩR with a perpendicular polarizer are 46 and 101 cm–1 for the C≡N and C=O vibrations, respectively,
which are the same values as we observed when probing next to the
plasmonic array.
Theoretical Analysis
In order to
extract coupling strengths
and confirm that the plasmonic array acts as an artificial molecule
enhancing the total coupling strength of the system, we turn to theoretical
analysis of the experimental data. This analysis is essentially based
on the coupled harmonic oscillator algebra in the simplest possible
implementation. Furthermore, this analysis requires several rather
crude assumptions, which may be false in general, but are satisfactory
for the goal of extracting the collective coupling constants.In view of the above remark, we describe the cavity by a set of M orthogonal Fabry–Perot eigenmodes, each coupling
to the molecular resonance with a certain coupling constant. As we
are far from the ultrastrong coupling regime in this case, the interacting
system can be described by a multimode coupled-harmonic oscillator
Hamiltonian, which under the rotating wave approximation takes the
form (see Methods)where â and b̂ are the annihilation operators of the mth cavity mode and that of the molecular resonance, respectively,
and gm is the coupling constant.The coupled Fabry–Perot system exhibits transmission peaks
at its polaritonic resonances, corresponding to the eigenvalues of
the Hamiltonian (eq ). Therefore, we estimate the cavity–molecule coupling strength
by fitting the energies of the transmission peaks by the eigenvalues
of Hamiltonian eq accounting
for M = 20 lowest cavity modes (see Methods for the details of the fitting procedure). Since in
the multimode system the coupling strength is dependent on the FP
mode order and the frequency, to make a reasonable comparison we estimate
the coupling strength at zero detuning, that is, with the particular
FP mode, (near-)resonant with the molecular transition.By fitting
the Hamiltonian eigenvalues to the positions of measured
transmission peaks (see Figure S6), we
obtain the hexanal-cavity system zero-detuning coupling strength (with
the seventh FP mode of a 14.25 μm thick cavity) of about
41 cm–1. Remarkably, this value is close
to the bulk polariton coupling strength of hexanal cm–1, which describes
the photon–molecule interaction strength in an unbounded homogeneous
molecular medium.[56] Similarly, for the
4-butylbenzonitrile-cavity system we obtain the zero-detuning coupling
strength (with the 11th mode of a 16.15 μm thick cavity)
of about 18 cm–1, which is also comparable
to the respective bulk coupling strength of 4-butylbenzonitrile (21 cm–1).In a similar way, we analyze the cavity–nanorod
system by
replacing the single collective molecular resonance with a single
mode plasmonic mode (see Methods). By fitting
the measured dispersion of transmission peaks with the Hamiltonian
eigenvalues, we obtain the energy spectrum of the coupled system, Figure a. For as long as
the plasmonic array is located in a specific horizontal plane z = z0 of the cavity, the coupling
strength strongly disperses with the mode order m as the result of alternating electric field nodes and antinodes
of the cavity’s standing wave (see Methods). Considering the fourth FP mode of a 9.7 μm thick
cavity resonant at about 2000 cm–1 (which
is close to both molecular resonances), we obtain the nanorod array
coupling strength to that cavity mode of about 172 cm–1. To help appreciate the appearance of anticrossings in this multimode
system, we present the resulting dispersion of the Hamiltonian eigenvalues
in a shorter spectral range in Figure S7, which also demonstrate a set of anticrossings between the polaritonic
states.
Figure 4
Hamiltonian analysis of the experimental data. (a) Fitting of the
measured transmission peaks of the coupled nanorod-cavity system (circles)
with eigenvalues of the multimode JC Hamiltonian (lines). (b) The
same as (a) for the hybrid hexanal-nanorod system. (c) The same as
(a) for the hybrid 4-butylbenzonitrile-nanorod system.
Hamiltonian analysis of the experimental data. (a) Fitting of the
measured transmission peaks of the coupled nanorod-cavity system (circles)
with eigenvalues of the multimode JC Hamiltonian (lines). (b) The
same as (a) for the hybrid hexanal-nanorod system. (c) The same as
(a) for the hybrid 4-butylbenzonitrile-nanorod system.Finally, we switch to the complete cavity–plasmon–molecule
systems. The key idea of our experiment is to show that plasmonic
nanorods can act as artificial molecules with the oscillator strength
significantly exceeding molecular ones, joining the real molecules
in a single collective oscillator, and thus boosting the coupling
strength and Rabi splitting. Therefore, we model the full three-component
structures with the same Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian in which the
plasmon–molecule hybrid is described as a single collective
oscillator (see Methods). By fitting the
measured dispersion of transmission peaks of the hybrid plasmon–hexanal-cavity
system with the Hamiltonian eigenvalues, Figure b, we obtain a resonant coupling strength
(with the fifth FP mode of a 8.0 μm thick cavity and z = 500 nm) of about 220 cm–1.
Despite the number of assumptions made in the analysis, the Hamiltonian
fit shows a good agreement with measured transmission peaks. Similarly,
for the hybrid plasmon-4-butylbenzonitrile-cavity system we obtain
a resonant coupling strength of 202 cm–1 (with
the eigth FP mode of a 10.1 μm thick cavity), Figure c.The simple
analysis performed above suggests that the molecules
and the nanorods act indeed as a collective oscillator with the effective
coupling strength very approximately given by the sum of the two individual
coupling strengths, geff ∼ gpl + gmol. Thus,
the presence of the plasmon boosts the effective coupling strength
of 4-butylbenzonitrile and hexanal with the cavity mode by 10 times
and 5 times, respectively. The results of our experiment and its subsequent
analysis suggest that using the plasmon resonance with large oscillator
strength indeed boosts the effective coupling strength beyond the
bulk limit bound by the molecular concentration. Of course, this addition
of the plasmonic meta-atoms does not modify the molecular oscillator
strength per se but rather modifies the effective polaritonic spectrum
of the hybrid system in the vibrational strong coupling regime. This
in turn may potentially affect chemical reactions whose rate was claimed
to depend on the vacuum Rabi splitting in the recent literature.[30]
Conclusion
In summary, our hybrid
Fabry–Perot cavities show that the
addition of a plasmonic array to the standard molecular vibro-polaritonic
system increases the total coupling strength by almost an order of
magnitude for a nitrile absorption band and five times for a carbonyl
absorption band. Increasing the coupling strength beyond the molecular
concentration limit dismantles the crucial obstacle for reaching the
ultrastrong coupling regime using organic molecules. Furthermore,
precisely controlling the coupling strength, not only with the molecular
concentration but also with the density of the plasmonic array, allows
molecules at small concentrations to reach the strong coupling limit
in a complementary fashion than the cooperating vibrational strong
coupling reported by Lather et al.[26] One
can in a sense view the plasmonic array as a form of “catalyst”
that enables any on-resonance molecular transition, regardless of
molecular concentration and transition dipole moment strength, to
reach the strong coupling regime. Furthermore, the cavity reduces
the radiative damping from the plasmon, sharpening the polariton line
width with more than an order of magnitude. Together with the spectral
tuning ability, such sharp line widths may allow for mode-selective
chemical sensing in the mid-IR. The approach described here is not
limited to infrared transitions but can also be transposed to electronic
transitions. For these reasons, we suggest that our hybrid system
will be an ideal platform to explore the promising potential of polaritonic
chemistry, the ultrastrong coupling regime, as well as provide an
approach to mode-selective mid-IR sensing.
Authors: Jino George; Atef Shalabney; James A Hutchison; Cyriaque Genet; Thomas W Ebbesen Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Daniel Rodrigo; Odeta Limaj; Davide Janner; Dordaneh Etezadi; F Javier García de Abajo; Valerio Pruneri; Hatice Altug Journal: Science Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: David M Coles; Niccolo Somaschi; Paolo Michetti; Caspar Clark; Pavlos G Lagoudakis; Pavlos G Savvidis; David G Lidzey Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Xiaolan Zhong; Thibault Chervy; Lei Zhang; Anoop Thomas; Jino George; Cyriaque Genet; James A Hutchison; Thomas W Ebbesen Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Manuel Hertzog; Per Rudquist; James A Hutchison; Jino George; Thomas W Ebbesen; Karl Börjesson Journal: Chemistry Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 5.236