Literature DB >> 33501344

Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.

Sladjana Nørskov1, Malene F Damholdt2, John P Ulhøi3, Morten B Jensen4, Charles Ess5, Johanna Seibt6.   

Abstract

It is well-established in the literature that biases (e. g., related to body size, ethnicity, race etc.) can occur during the employment interview and that applicants' fairness perceptions related to selection procedures can influence attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward the recruiting organization. This study explores how social robotics may affect this situation. Using an online, video vignette-based experimental survey (n = 235), the study examines applicant fairness perceptions of two types of job interviews: a face-to-face and a robot-mediated interview. To reduce the risk of socially desirable responses, desensitize the topic, and detect any inconsistencies in the respondents' reactions to vignette scenarios, the study employs a first-person and a third-person perspective. In the robot-mediated interview, two teleoperated robots are used as fair proxies for the applicant and the interviewer, thus providing symmetrical visual anonymity unlike prior research that relied on asymmetrical anonymity, in which only one party was anonymized. This design is intended to eliminate visual cues that typically cause implicit biases and discrimination of applicants, but also to prevent biasing the interviewer's assessment through impression management tactics typically used by applicants. We hypothesize that fairness perception (i.e., procedural fairness and interactional fairness) and behavioral intentions (i.e., intentions of job acceptance, reapplication intentions, and recommendation intentions) will be higher in a robot-mediated job interview than in a face-to-face job interview, and that this effect will be stronger for introvert applicants. The study shows, contrary to our expectations, that the face-to-face interview is perceived as fairer, and that the applicant's personality (introvert vs. extravert) does not affect this perception. We discuss this finding and its implications, and address avenues for future research.
Copyright © 2020 Nørskov, Damholdt, Ulhøi, Jensen, Ess and Seibt.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fair proxy; fairness perceptions; implicit biases; job interview; robot-mediated interview

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501344      PMCID: PMC7805899          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.586263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  20 in total

1.  Go with Your Gut: Emotion and Evaluation in Job Interviews.

Authors:  Lauren A Rivera
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2015-03

2.  Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups.

Authors:  Astrid C Homan; Daan van Knippenberg; Gerben A Van Kleef; Carsten K W De Dreu
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2007-09

3.  Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance.

Authors:  Amy J C Cuddy; Caroline A Wilmuth; Andy J Yap; Dana R Carney
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2015-02-09

4.  Do extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts?

Authors:  Inna Fishman; Rowena Ng; Ursula Bellugi
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time.

Authors:  Calvin K Lai; Allison L Skinner; Erin Cooley; Sohad Murrar; Markus Brauer; Thierry Devos; Jimmy Calanchini; Y Jenny Xiao; Christina Pedram; Christopher K Marshburn; Stefanie Simon; John C Blanchar; Jennifer A Joy-Gaba; John Conway; Liz Redford; Rick A Klein; Gina Roussos; Fabian M H Schellhaas; Mason Burns; Xiaoqing Hu; Meghan C McLean; Jordan R Axt; Shaki Asgari; Kathleen Schmidt; Rachel Rubinstein; Maddalena Marini; Sandro Rubichi; Jiyun-Elizabeth L Shin; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-16

7.  Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: an experimental vignette study.

Authors:  Jenni Burt; Gary Abel; Natasha Elmore; Cathy Lloyd; John Benson; Lara Sarson; Anna Carluccio; John Campbell; Marc N Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  An experimental study exploring the impact of vignette gender on the quality of university students' mental health first aid for peers with symptoms of depression.

Authors:  E Bethan Davies; John Wardlaw; Richard Morriss; Cris Glazebrook
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Impression Management in the Job Interview: An Effective Way of Mitigating Discrimination against Older Applicants?

Authors:  Irina Gioaba; Franciska Krings
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-16

10.  Age-based hiring discrimination as a function of equity norms and self-perceived objectivity.

Authors:  Nicole M Lindner; Alexander Graser; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and initial validation of a scale for the situational recognition of the basic psychological needs.

Authors:  Panagiotis Varsamis; Georgios Katsanis; Eleni Iosifidou
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-01-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.