Literature DB >> 27454041

Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time.

Calvin K Lai1, Allison L Skinner2, Erin Cooley3, Sohad Murrar4, Markus Brauer4, Thierry Devos5, Jimmy Calanchini6, Y Jenny Xiao7, Christina Pedram8, Christopher K Marshburn8, Stefanie Simon9, John C Blanchar10, Jennifer A Joy-Gaba11, John Conway12, Liz Redford12, Rick A Klein12, Gina Roussos13, Fabian M H Schellhaas13, Mason Burns14, Xiaoqing Hu15, Meghan C McLean16, Jordan R Axt17, Shaki Asgari18, Kathleen Schmidt19, Rachel Rubinstein16, Maddalena Marini20, Sandro Rubichi21, Jiyun-Elizabeth L Shin22, Brian A Nosek17.   

Abstract

Implicit preferences are malleable, but does that change last? We tested 9 interventions (8 real and 1 sham) to reduce implicit racial preferences over time. In 2 studies with a total of 6,321 participants, all 9 interventions immediately reduced implicit preferences. However, none were effective after a delay of several hours to several days. We also found that these interventions did not change explicit racial preferences and were not reliably moderated by motivations to respond without prejudice. Short-term malleability in implicit preferences does not necessarily lead to long-term change, raising new questions about the flexibility and stability of implicit preferences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27454041     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  58 in total

Review 1.  Grappling With Implicit Social Bias: A Perspective From Memory Research.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Jessica D Creery; Xiaoqing Hu; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Model-free and model-based learning processes in the updating of explicit and implicit evaluations.

Authors:  Benedek Kurdi; Samuel J Gershman; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias.

Authors:  Eugene K Ofosu; Michelle K Chambers; Jacqueline M Chen; Eric Hehman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions.

Authors:  Jeremy Cone; Kathryn Flaharty; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Applied Racial/Ethnic Healthcare Disparities Research Using Implicit Measures.

Authors:  Nao Hagiwara; John F Dovidio; Jeff Stone; Louis A Penner
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  The Value of Interracial Contact for Reducing Anti-Black Bias Among Non-Black Physicians: A Cognitive Habits and Growth Evaluation (CHANGE) Study Report.

Authors:  Ivuoma N Onyeador; Natalie M Wittlin; Sara E Burke; John F Dovidio; Sylvia P Perry; Rachel R Hardeman; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Jeph Herrin; Sean M Phelan; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-11-19

7.  Dissociating Automatic Associations: Comparing Two Implicit Measurements of Race Bias.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Laura D Scherer; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17

8.  A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; Calvin K Lai; Jordan R Axt; Charles R Ebersole; Michelle Herman; Patricia G Devine; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-06-13

9.  Women from some under-represented minorities are given too few talks at world's largest Earth-science conference.

Authors:  Heather L Ford; Cameron Brick; Margarita Azmitia; Karine Blaufuss; Petra Dekens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Age Differences in Explicit and Implicit Age Attitudes Across the Life Span.

Authors:  William J Chopik; Hannah L Giasson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.