Literature DB >> 33501328

Repetitive Robot Behavior Impacts Perception of Intentionality and Gaze-Related Attentional Orienting.

Abdulaziz Abubshait1, Agnieszka Wykowska1.   

Abstract

Gaze behavior is an important social signal between humans as it communicates locations of interest. People typically orient their attention to where others look as this informs about others' intentions and future actions. Studies have shown that humans can engage in similar gaze behavior with robots but presumably more so when they adopt the intentional stance toward them (i.e., believing robot behaviors are intentional). In laboratory settings, the phenomenon of attending toward the direction of others' gaze has been examined with the use of the gaze-cueing paradigm. While the gaze-cueing paradigm has been successful in investigating the relationship between adopting the intentional stance toward robots and attention orienting to gaze cues, it is unclear if the repetitiveness of the gaze-cueing paradigm influences adopting the intentional stance. Here, we examined if the duration of exposure to repetitive robot gaze behavior in a gaze-cueing task has a negative impact on subjective attribution of intentionality. Participants performed a short, medium, or long face-to-face gaze-cueing paradigm with an embodied robot while subjective ratings were collected pre and post the interaction. Results show that participants in the long exposure condition had the smallest change in their intention attribution scores, if any, while those in the short exposure condition had a positive change in their intention attribution, indicating that participants attributed more intention to the robot after short interactions. The results also show that attention orienting to robot gaze-cues was positively related to how much intention was attributed to the robot, but this relationship became more negative as the length of exposure increased. In contrast to subjective ratings, the gaze-cueing effects (GCEs) increased as a function of the duration of exposure to repetitive behavior. The data suggest a tradeoff between the desired number of trials needed for observing various mechanisms of social cognition, such as GCEs, and the likelihood of adopting the intentional stance toward a robot.
Copyright © 2020 Abubshait and Wykowska.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention orienting; gaze cueing; human robot interaction; intention attribution; intentional stance; social cognition

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501328      PMCID: PMC7805881          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.565825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  38 in total

1.  Believing androids - fMRI activation in the right temporo-parietal junction is modulated by ascribing intentions to non-human agents.

Authors:  Ceylan Özdem; Eva Wiese; Agnieszka Wykowska; Hermann Müller; Marcel Brass; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Social status gates social attention in monkeys.

Authors:  Stephen V Shepherd; Robert O Deaner; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Negativity bias in attribution of external agency.

Authors:  Carey K Morewedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

4.  Can Robotic Interaction Improve Joint Attention Skills?

Authors:  Zachary E Warren; Zhi Zheng; Amy R Swanson; Esubalew Bekele; Lian Zhang; Julie A Crittendon; Amy F Weitlauf; Nilanjan Sarkar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-11

5.  Predicting others' actions via grasp and gaze: evidence for distinct brain networks.

Authors:  Richard Ramsey; Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-27

6.  A non-verbal Turing test: differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction.

Authors:  Ulrich J Pfeiffer; Bert Timmermans; Gary Bente; Kai Vogeley; Leonhard Schilbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Beliefs about the minds of others influence how we process sensory information.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wykowska; Eva Wiese; Aaron Prosser; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The impact of perceived social power and dangerous context on social attention.

Authors:  Gege Cui; Shen Zhang; Haiyan Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Julie C Main; Anthony C Little; Lisa L M Welling; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Temporal dynamics underlying the modulation of social status on social attention.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Giovanni Galfano; Carol Coricelli; Luigi Castelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Facing the FACS-Using AI to Evaluate and Control Facial Action Units in Humanoid Robot Face Development.

Authors:  Marius Auflem; Sampsa Kohtala; Malte Jung; Martin Steinert
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Examining Social Cognition with Embodied Robots: Does Prior Experience with a Robot Impact Feedback-associated Learning in a Gambling Task?

Authors:  Abdulaziz Abubshait; Craig G McDonald; Eva Wiese
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-05-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.